Skip to content

Study of Radium-223 Dichloride in Combination With Exemestane and Everolimus Versus Placebo in Combination With Exemestane and Everolimus in Subjects With Bone Predominant HER2 Negative Hormone Receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Phase II Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Radium-223 Dichloride in Combination With Exemestane and Everolimus Versus Placebo in Combination With Exemestane and Everolimus When Administered to Metastatic HER2 Negative Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Subjects With Bone Metastases

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02258451
Enrollment
283
Registered
2014-10-07
Start date
2015-06-04
Completion date
2022-10-28
Last updated
2023-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of radium 223 dichloride in subjects with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer with bone metastases treated with exemestane and everolimus After implementation of CSP Amendment 10, only a limited number of subjects will remain in this study, in order to reduce the burden to study subjects, collection of data will be reduced and will focus mainly on acute safety, SSE, and OS. Once subjects are rolled over, the long-term safety will be collected and assessed entirely in the separate extended safety follow-up study.

Interventions

DRUGRadium-223 dichloride (Xofigo, BAY88-8223)

Up to 6 cycles of radium-223 dichloride 50kBq/kg body (55 kBq/kg after implementation of NIST update)

DRUGPlacebo (saline)

Up to 6 cycles of saline injection

DRUGExemestane

One 25 mg tablet once daily after a meal.

DRUGEverolimus

The recommended dose of everolimus administered in the study is 10 mg once daily with or without food. Starting dose, dose modifications, and administration of exemestane and everolimus must be in compliance with the local labels in each of the participating countries and/or in line with local standard of practice.

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women (≥18 years of age) with metastatic breast cancer not amenable to curative treatment by surgery or radiotherapy. * Documentation of histological or cytological confirmation of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative adenocarcinoma of the breast must be available. * Documentation of menopausal status: postmenopausal subjects or pre-menopausal subjects with ovarian radiation or concomitant therapy with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist/antagonist are eligible. * Subjects with bone dominant disease with at least 2 skeletal metastases identified at baseline by bone scintigraphy and confirmed by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). * Subjects must have received at least one line of hormonal therapy in the metastatic setting. * Subjects who are eligible as per the Investigator's assessment and according to the local label for treatment with exemestane and everolimus as a second line or greater of hormone therapy in a metastatic setting. * Subjects must have experienced recurrent/progressive disease following treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (letrozole or anastrozole) in an adjuvant or metastatic setting * Subjects must have experienced no more than two skeletal-related events (SREs) prior to study entry defined as: need for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to bone pain, pathological bone fracture (excluding major trauma), spinal cord compression and/or orthopedic surgical procedure. Subjects with no prior SREs are not permitted. * Subjects must be on therapy with bisphosphonates or denosumab for at least 1 month before start of study treatment. * Adequate hematological, liver and kidney function.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with Inflammatory breast cancer. * Patients with immediately life-threatening visceral disease for whom chemotherapy is preferred treatment option. * Subjects who have either received chemotherapy for metastatic disease or are considered by the treating investigator to be appropriate candidates for chemotherapy as current treatment for metastatic breast cancer are excluded. Chemotherapy administered for adjuvant/neo adjuvant disease is acceptable provided it was administered at least 1 year prior to study entry. * Subjects who received prior treatment or are already receiving everolimus treatment prior to study entry are not eligible. * Subjects with known or history of brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease: subjects with neurological symptoms must undergo a contrast CT scan or MRI of the brain within 28 days prior to randomization to exclude active brain metastasis. Imaging of the central nervous system (CNS) is otherwise not required.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS)Up to 55 monthsTime from date of randomization to occurrence of one of the following, whichever happened earlier: 1) an on study SSE, which was defined as the use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to relieve skeletal symptoms, the occurrence of new symptomatic pathological bone fractures (vertebral or nonvertebral), the occurrence of spinal cord compression, a tumor related orthopedic surgical intervention; or 2) death from any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Cytotoxic ChemotherapyUp to 55 monthsTime from the date of randomization to the date of the first cytotoxic chemotherapy
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 monthsAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions.
Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsFrom post-treatment till end of study, up to 45.8 monthsAccording to protocol amendment 10, all participants who completed the EOT visit will be transferred to a separate extended safety follow-up study for their remaining follow-up. Thus, no further post-treatment data were collected after protocol amendment 10.
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentFrom first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 months
Number of Participants With New Primary MalignanciesFrom first dosing till end of study, up to 72.6 months
Overall SurvivalUp to 55 monthsThe time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis.
Time to Opiate Use for Cancer PainUp to 55 monthsInterval from the date of randomization to the date of opiate use
Time to Pain ProgressionUp to 55 monthsTime from randomization to the first date a participant experienced pain progression based on WPS. Pain progression was defined as an increase of 2 or more points in the BPI-SF Worst pain in 24 hours score from baseline observed at 2 consecutive evaluations ≥4 weeks apart or an increase in pain management (IPM) with respect to baseline, whichever occurred first. An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline.
Radiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS)Up to 55 monthsTime from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed radiological progression in either soft tissue, viscera or bone, or death (if death occurs before progression). Progression is defined using the modified RECIST 1.1 criteria (the modification refers to bone lesions assessment). Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or an unequivocal increase in non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. All bone lesions are considered non-measurable and new bone lesions identified by bone scan should be confirmed by further imaging (CT/MRI). If a new bone lesion or unequivocal increase in size of bone lesions is only visible on a CT/MRI and not visible on a technetium-99m bone scan, progression should be declared without further confirmation.
Percentage of Participants With Pain ImprovementUp to 55 monthsIn the percentage of participants with confirmed pain improvement. Confirmed pain improvement is defined a 2-point decrease or more in BPI-SF WPS from baseline over 2 consecutive measurements conducted at least 4 weeks apart, without an increase in pain management (IPM). An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months
Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary AnalysisFrom first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months
Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)From post-treatment till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 monthsAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Poland, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted with first participant first visit on 04-JUN-2015 and last participant last visit on 28-OCT-2022.

Pre-assignment details

Overall, 389 participants were screened and 283 were assigned to treatment. Of these, 142 in the radium 223 dichloride arm and 141 in the placebo arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radium-223 + EXE/EVE
Participants randomized to treatment with radium-223 dichloride, 50 kBq/kg body weight (55 kBq/kg after implementation of NIST update) also received exemestane (EXE), 25-mg tablet once daily (after a meal), and everolimus (EVE), 10 mg once daily (with or without food), and supportive care as per the local or institutional standard of practice
142
Placebo + EXE/EVE
Participants randomized to treatment with placebo, also received exemestane (EXE), 25-mg tablet once daily (after a meal), and everolimus (EVE), 10 mg once daily (with or without food), and supportive care as per the local or institutional standard of practice
141
Total283

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to adverse event associated with clinical disease progression86
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to adverse event not associated with clinical disease progression81
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to death43
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to end point reached11
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to physician decision02
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to progressive disease - clinical progression77
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to progressive disease - radiological progression90101
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to study terminated by sponsor03
Overall StudyDiscontinuation all treatment due to withdrawal by participant2113
Overall StudyNever treated23
Overall StudyOther reason11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadium-223 + EXE/EVEPlacebo + EXE/EVETotal
Age, Continuous59.95 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
59.08 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.64
59.52 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.02
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
127 Participants125 Participants252 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
142 Participants141 Participants283 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
66 / 13967 / 139
other
Total, other adverse events
139 / 139135 / 139
serious
Total, serious adverse events
61 / 13956 / 139

Outcome results

Primary

Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS)

Time from date of randomization to occurrence of one of the following, whichever happened earlier: 1) an on study SSE, which was defined as the use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to relieve skeletal symptoms, the occurrence of new symptomatic pathological bone fractures (vertebral or nonvertebral), the occurrence of spinal cord compression, a tumor related orthopedic surgical intervention; or 2) death from any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis.

Time frame: Up to 55 months

Population: Intent to treat analysis set: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVESymptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS)21.1 Months
Placebo + EXE/EVESymptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS)19.9 Months
Comparison: The 1-sided null hypothesis that treatment with radium-223 dichloride does not result in superior SSE-FS to treatment with placebo in participant population was tested against the 1-sided alternative hypothesis that the treatment with radium-223 dichloride results in superior SSE-FS time to treatment the placebo. H0: SSE-FS Radium-223+Exemestane/Everolimus \<= SSE-FS Placebo+Exemestane/Everolimus, versus HA: SSE-FSRadium-223+Exemestane/Everolimus \> SSE-FS Placebo+Exemestane/Everolimusp-value: 0.484380% CI: [0.72, 1.102]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment

Time frame: From first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 months

Population: Safety analysis set with at least one hematology lab assessment: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus), and who in addition had at least one hematology lab assessment. Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 161 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 243 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 321 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaNormal14 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 10 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 20 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 30 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 317 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisNormal139 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 10 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 21 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 30 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedNormal138 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 120 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 263 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 343 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 42 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedNormal11 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 10 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 22 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 30 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedNormal137 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 123 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 248 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 319 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedNormal49 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 160 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 27 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 37 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedNormal64 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 137 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 259 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedNormal25 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 148 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 33 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 41 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 42 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 157 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedNormal35 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 255 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 311 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 10 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedNormal77 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentAnemiaNormal14 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 22 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 10 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedNormal48 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 20 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 160 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLeukocytosisNormal137 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedNormal74 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 10 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count increasedNormal135 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 20 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 23 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 130 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentWhite blood cell decreasedGrade 237 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentHemoglobin increasedNormal137 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 228 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 133 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentPlatelet count decreasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 245 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentNeutrophil count decreasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under TreatmentLymphocyte count decreasedGrade 324 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies

Time frame: From first dosing till end of study, up to 72.6 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With New Primary Malignancies1 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With New Primary Malignancies0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events

According to protocol amendment 10, all participants who completed the EOT visit will be transferred to a separate extended safety follow-up study for their remaining follow-up. Thus, no further post-treatment data were collected after protocol amendment 10.

Time frame: From post-treatment till end of study, up to 45.8 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsAll system organ classes_Any_Grade 31 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsAll system organ classes_Any_Grade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsBlood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 31 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsBlood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 31 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsInvestigations_Any_Grade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsInvestigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 41 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsInvestigations_Any_Grade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsAll system organ classes_Any_Grade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsBlood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsAll system organ classes_Any_Grade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsInvestigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse EventsBlood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions.

Time frame: From first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE139 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Exemestane-related TEAEs75 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs73 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Everolimus-related TEAEs130 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE57 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Everolimus-related TEAEs125 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE136 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE55 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs50 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Exemestane-related TEAEs64 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

The time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis.

Time frame: Up to 55 months

Population: Intent to treat analysis set: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVEOverall Survival25.0 Months
Placebo + EXE/EVEOverall Survival26.4 Months
p-value: 0.843895% CI: [0.697, 1.343]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pain Improvement

In the percentage of participants with confirmed pain improvement. Confirmed pain improvement is defined a 2-point decrease or more in BPI-SF WPS from baseline over 2 consecutive measurements conducted at least 4 weeks apart, without an increase in pain management (IPM). An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline.

Time frame: Up to 55 months

Population: Safety analysis set with baseline WPS \>= 2: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo exemestane, or everolimus), and who in addition had baseline BPI-SF WPS \>= 2. Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVEPercentage of Participants With Pain Improvement38.5 percentage of participants
Placebo + EXE/EVEPercentage of Participants With Pain Improvement34.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.55695% CI: [-10.2, 18.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Radiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

Time from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed radiological progression in either soft tissue, viscera or bone, or death (if death occurs before progression). Progression is defined using the modified RECIST 1.1 criteria (the modification refers to bone lesions assessment). Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or an unequivocal increase in non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. All bone lesions are considered non-measurable and new bone lesions identified by bone scan should be confirmed by further imaging (CT/MRI). If a new bone lesion or unequivocal increase in size of bone lesions is only visible on a CT/MRI and not visible on a technetium-99m bone scan, progression should be declared without further confirmation.

Time frame: Up to 55 months

Population: ITT analysis set: included all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVERadiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS)7.9 Months
Placebo + EXE/EVERadiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS)6.7 Months
p-value: 0.346795% CI: [0.66, 1.157]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Time from the date of randomization to the date of the first cytotoxic chemotherapy

Time frame: Up to 55 months

Population: ITT analysis set: included all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVETime to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy13.7 Months
Placebo + EXE/EVETime to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy11.6 Months
p-value: 0.449695% CI: [0.641, 1.219]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain

Interval from the date of randomization to the date of opiate use

Time frame: Up to 55 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVETime to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain21.4 Months
Placebo + EXE/EVETime to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain18.4 Months
p-value: 0.881195% CI: [0.577, 1.604]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Pain Progression

Time from randomization to the first date a participant experienced pain progression based on WPS. Pain progression was defined as an increase of 2 or more points in the BPI-SF Worst pain in 24 hours score from baseline observed at 2 consecutive evaluations ≥4 weeks apart or an increase in pain management (IPM) with respect to baseline, whichever occurred first. An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline.

Time frame: Up to 55 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVETime to Pain Progression7.6 Months
Placebo + EXE/EVETime to Pain Progression5.7 Months
Comparison: Participants with baseline WPS \> 8 were included in the analysis population but censored at Day 1.p-value: 0.653795% CI: [0.667, 1.289]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)

Time frame: From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months

Population: Safety analysis set with at least one hematology lab assessment: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus), and who in addition had at least one hematology lab assessment. Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 10 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 243 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 321 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaNormal14 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 10 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 20 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 30 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisNormal139 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 161 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 21 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 30 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedNormal138 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 120 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 263 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 343 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 42 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedNormal11 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 10 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 22 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 30 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedNormal137 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 124 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 247 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 319 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedNormal49 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 160 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 27 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 37 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedNormal64 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 137 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 259 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 317 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedNormal25 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 33 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 157 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 10 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 255 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 161 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 311 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 22 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 147 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)AnemiaNormal14 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 10 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 22 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 20 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedNormal50 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count increasedNormal135 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)LeukocytosisNormal137 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 10 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 129 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 20 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 236 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 228 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Hemoglobin increasedNormal137 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 133 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)White blood cell decreasedGrade 41 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 245 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 42 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 324 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Platelet count decreasedNormal74 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Neutrophil count decreasedNormal78 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Lymphocyte count decreasedNormal35 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary Analysis

Time frame: From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary Analysis1 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary Analysis0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)

Time frame: From post-treatment till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)All system organ classes_Any_Grade 31 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)All system organ classes_Any_Grade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 31 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 31 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Investigations_Any_Grade 41 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Investigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 41 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Investigations_Any_Grade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)All system organ classes_Any_Grade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 30 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)All system organ classes_Any_Grade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Investigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 40 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 30 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions.

Time frame: From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months

Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Serious TEAE57 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Exemestane-related TEAEs75 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs73 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Everolimus-related TEAEs130 Participants
Radium-223 + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Any TEAE139 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Everolimus-related TEAEs125 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Any TEAE136 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Serious TEAE53 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs50 Participants
Placebo + EXE/EVENumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)Exemestane-related TEAEs64 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026