Breast Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
Breast Cancer
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of radium 223 dichloride in subjects with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative hormone receptor positive breast cancer with bone metastases treated with exemestane and everolimus After implementation of CSP Amendment 10, only a limited number of subjects will remain in this study, in order to reduce the burden to study subjects, collection of data will be reduced and will focus mainly on acute safety, SSE, and OS. Once subjects are rolled over, the long-term safety will be collected and assessed entirely in the separate extended safety follow-up study.
Interventions
Up to 6 cycles of radium-223 dichloride 50kBq/kg body (55 kBq/kg after implementation of NIST update)
Up to 6 cycles of saline injection
One 25 mg tablet once daily after a meal.
The recommended dose of everolimus administered in the study is 10 mg once daily with or without food. Starting dose, dose modifications, and administration of exemestane and everolimus must be in compliance with the local labels in each of the participating countries and/or in line with local standard of practice.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Women (≥18 years of age) with metastatic breast cancer not amenable to curative treatment by surgery or radiotherapy. * Documentation of histological or cytological confirmation of estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative adenocarcinoma of the breast must be available. * Documentation of menopausal status: postmenopausal subjects or pre-menopausal subjects with ovarian radiation or concomitant therapy with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist/antagonist are eligible. * Subjects with bone dominant disease with at least 2 skeletal metastases identified at baseline by bone scintigraphy and confirmed by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). * Subjects must have received at least one line of hormonal therapy in the metastatic setting. * Subjects who are eligible as per the Investigator's assessment and according to the local label for treatment with exemestane and everolimus as a second line or greater of hormone therapy in a metastatic setting. * Subjects must have experienced recurrent/progressive disease following treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (letrozole or anastrozole) in an adjuvant or metastatic setting * Subjects must have experienced no more than two skeletal-related events (SREs) prior to study entry defined as: need for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to bone pain, pathological bone fracture (excluding major trauma), spinal cord compression and/or orthopedic surgical procedure. Subjects with no prior SREs are not permitted. * Subjects must be on therapy with bisphosphonates or denosumab for at least 1 month before start of study treatment. * Adequate hematological, liver and kidney function.
Exclusion criteria
* Subjects with Inflammatory breast cancer. * Patients with immediately life-threatening visceral disease for whom chemotherapy is preferred treatment option. * Subjects who have either received chemotherapy for metastatic disease or are considered by the treating investigator to be appropriate candidates for chemotherapy as current treatment for metastatic breast cancer are excluded. Chemotherapy administered for adjuvant/neo adjuvant disease is acceptable provided it was administered at least 1 year prior to study entry. * Subjects who received prior treatment or are already receiving everolimus treatment prior to study entry are not eligible. * Subjects with known or history of brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease: subjects with neurological symptoms must undergo a contrast CT scan or MRI of the brain within 28 days prior to randomization to exclude active brain metastasis. Imaging of the central nervous system (CNS) is otherwise not required.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS) | Up to 55 months | Time from date of randomization to occurrence of one of the following, whichever happened earlier: 1) an on study SSE, which was defined as the use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to relieve skeletal symptoms, the occurrence of new symptomatic pathological bone fractures (vertebral or nonvertebral), the occurrence of spinal cord compression, a tumor related orthopedic surgical intervention; or 2) death from any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy | Up to 55 months | Time from the date of randomization to the date of the first cytotoxic chemotherapy |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | From first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 months | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions. |
| Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | From post-treatment till end of study, up to 45.8 months | According to protocol amendment 10, all participants who completed the EOT visit will be transferred to a separate extended safety follow-up study for their remaining follow-up. Thus, no further post-treatment data were collected after protocol amendment 10. |
| Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | From first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 months | — |
| Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies | From first dosing till end of study, up to 72.6 months | — |
| Overall Survival | Up to 55 months | The time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis. |
| Time to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain | Up to 55 months | Interval from the date of randomization to the date of opiate use |
| Time to Pain Progression | Up to 55 months | Time from randomization to the first date a participant experienced pain progression based on WPS. Pain progression was defined as an increase of 2 or more points in the BPI-SF Worst pain in 24 hours score from baseline observed at 2 consecutive evaluations ≥4 weeks apart or an increase in pain management (IPM) with respect to baseline, whichever occurred first. An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline. |
| Radiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | Up to 55 months | Time from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed radiological progression in either soft tissue, viscera or bone, or death (if death occurs before progression). Progression is defined using the modified RECIST 1.1 criteria (the modification refers to bone lesions assessment). Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or an unequivocal increase in non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. All bone lesions are considered non-measurable and new bone lesions identified by bone scan should be confirmed by further imaging (CT/MRI). If a new bone lesion or unequivocal increase in size of bone lesions is only visible on a CT/MRI and not visible on a technetium-99m bone scan, progression should be declared without further confirmation. |
| Percentage of Participants With Pain Improvement | Up to 55 months | In the percentage of participants with confirmed pain improvement. Confirmed pain improvement is defined a 2-point decrease or more in BPI-SF WPS from baseline over 2 consecutive measurements conducted at least 4 weeks apart, without an increase in pain management (IPM). An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months | — |
| Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary Analysis | From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months | — |
| Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | From post-treatment till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months | — |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions. |
Countries
Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Poland, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted with first participant first visit on 04-JUN-2015 and last participant last visit on 28-OCT-2022.
Pre-assignment details
Overall, 389 participants were screened and 283 were assigned to treatment. Of these, 142 in the radium 223 dichloride arm and 141 in the placebo arm.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE Participants randomized to treatment with radium-223 dichloride, 50 kBq/kg body weight (55 kBq/kg after implementation of NIST update) also received exemestane (EXE), 25-mg tablet once daily (after a meal), and everolimus (EVE), 10 mg once daily (with or without food), and supportive care as per the local or institutional standard of practice | 142 |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE Participants randomized to treatment with placebo, also received exemestane (EXE), 25-mg tablet once daily (after a meal), and everolimus (EVE), 10 mg once daily (with or without food), and supportive care as per the local or institutional standard of practice | 141 |
| Total | 283 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to adverse event associated with clinical disease progression | 8 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to adverse event not associated with clinical disease progression | 8 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to death | 4 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to end point reached | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to physician decision | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to progressive disease - clinical progression | 7 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to progressive disease - radiological progression | 90 | 101 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to study terminated by sponsor | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Discontinuation all treatment due to withdrawal by participant | 21 | 13 |
| Overall Study | Never treated | 2 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Other reason | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Placebo + EXE/EVE | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 59.95 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 | 59.08 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.64 | 59.52 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.02 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 127 Participants | 125 Participants | 252 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 142 Participants | 141 Participants | 283 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 66 / 139 | 67 / 139 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 139 / 139 | 135 / 139 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 61 / 139 | 56 / 139 |
Outcome results
Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS)
Time from date of randomization to occurrence of one of the following, whichever happened earlier: 1) an on study SSE, which was defined as the use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to relieve skeletal symptoms, the occurrence of new symptomatic pathological bone fractures (vertebral or nonvertebral), the occurrence of spinal cord compression, a tumor related orthopedic surgical intervention; or 2) death from any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis.
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Population: Intent to treat analysis set: all randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS) | 21.1 Months |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Symptomatic Skeletal Event-free Survival (SSE-FS) | 19.9 Months |
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment
Time frame: From first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 months
Population: Safety analysis set with at least one hematology lab assessment: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus), and who in addition had at least one hematology lab assessment. Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 1 | 61 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 2 | 43 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 3 | 21 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Normal | 14 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 3 | 17 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Normal | 139 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Normal | 138 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 1 | 20 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 2 | 63 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 3 | 43 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Normal | 11 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Normal | 137 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 1 | 23 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 2 | 48 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 3 | 19 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Normal | 49 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 1 | 60 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Normal | 64 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 1 | 37 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 2 | 59 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Normal | 25 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 1 | 48 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 1 | 57 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Normal | 35 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 2 | 55 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Normal | 77 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Anemia | Normal | 14 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Normal | 48 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 1 | 60 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Leukocytosis | Normal | 137 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Normal | 74 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count increased | Normal | 135 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 1 | 30 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | White blood cell decreased | Grade 2 | 37 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Hemoglobin increased | Normal | 137 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 2 | 28 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 1 | 33 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Platelet count decreased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 2 | 45 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 3 | 24 Participants |
Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies
Time frame: From first dosing till end of study, up to 72.6 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies | 1 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events
According to protocol amendment 10, all participants who completed the EOT visit will be transferred to a separate extended safety follow-up study for their remaining follow-up. Thus, no further post-treatment data were collected after protocol amendment 10.
Time frame: From post-treatment till end of study, up to 45.8 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Investigations_Any_Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Investigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Investigations_Any_Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Investigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions.
Time frame: From first dosing up to 30 days after the last administration of study treatments, up to 72.6 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 139 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Exemestane-related TEAEs | 75 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs | 73 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Everolimus-related TEAEs | 130 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Serious TEAE | 57 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Everolimus-related TEAEs | 125 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 136 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Serious TEAE | 55 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs | 50 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Exemestane-related TEAEs | 64 Participants |
Overall Survival
The time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Per Protocol Amendment 10, following primary analysis completion, further assessments were focused on safety, and only limited efficacy data including SSE and survival were collected and not designed to support reconsideration of the primary analysis efficacy conclusions. Accordingly, no formal statistical analyses were performed for primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in the final analysis. All primary and secondary efficacy outcome measures presented in this document came from the primary completion analysis.
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Population: Intent to treat analysis set: all randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Overall Survival | 25.0 Months |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Overall Survival | 26.4 Months |
Percentage of Participants With Pain Improvement
In the percentage of participants with confirmed pain improvement. Confirmed pain improvement is defined a 2-point decrease or more in BPI-SF WPS from baseline over 2 consecutive measurements conducted at least 4 weeks apart, without an increase in pain management (IPM). An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline.
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Population: Safety analysis set with baseline WPS \>= 2: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo exemestane, or everolimus), and who in addition had baseline BPI-SF WPS \>= 2. Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Percentage of Participants With Pain Improvement | 38.5 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Percentage of Participants With Pain Improvement | 34.4 percentage of participants |
Radiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
Time from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed radiological progression in either soft tissue, viscera or bone, or death (if death occurs before progression). Progression is defined using the modified RECIST 1.1 criteria (the modification refers to bone lesions assessment). Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or an unequivocal increase in non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. All bone lesions are considered non-measurable and new bone lesions identified by bone scan should be confirmed by further imaging (CT/MRI). If a new bone lesion or unequivocal increase in size of bone lesions is only visible on a CT/MRI and not visible on a technetium-99m bone scan, progression should be declared without further confirmation.
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Population: ITT analysis set: included all randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Radiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | 7.9 Months |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Radiological Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | 6.7 Months |
Time to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
Time from the date of randomization to the date of the first cytotoxic chemotherapy
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Population: ITT analysis set: included all randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Time to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy | 13.7 Months |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Time to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy | 11.6 Months |
Time to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain
Interval from the date of randomization to the date of opiate use
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Time to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain | 21.4 Months |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Time to Opiate Use for Cancer Pain | 18.4 Months |
Time to Pain Progression
Time from randomization to the first date a participant experienced pain progression based on WPS. Pain progression was defined as an increase of 2 or more points in the BPI-SF Worst pain in 24 hours score from baseline observed at 2 consecutive evaluations ≥4 weeks apart or an increase in pain management (IPM) with respect to baseline, whichever occurred first. An IPM is defined as the initiation of any opioid in participants not taking opioids at baseline, the initiation of a strong opioid in participants taking a weak opioid at baseline, or the initiation of an additional strong opioid in participants taking a strong opioid at baseline.
Time frame: Up to 55 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Time to Pain Progression | 7.6 Months |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Time to Pain Progression | 5.7 Months |
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)
Time frame: From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months
Population: Safety analysis set with at least one hematology lab assessment: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus), and who in addition had at least one hematology lab assessment. Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 2 | 43 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 3 | 21 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Normal | 14 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Normal | 139 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 1 | 61 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Normal | 138 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 1 | 20 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 2 | 63 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 3 | 43 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Normal | 11 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Normal | 137 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 1 | 24 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 2 | 47 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 3 | 19 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Normal | 49 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 1 | 60 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Normal | 64 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 1 | 37 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 2 | 59 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 3 | 17 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Normal | 25 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 1 | 57 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 2 | 55 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 1 | 61 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 1 | 47 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Anemia | Normal | 14 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Normal | 50 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count increased | Normal | 135 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Leukocytosis | Normal | 137 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 1 | 29 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 2 | 36 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 2 | 28 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Hemoglobin increased | Normal | 137 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 1 | 33 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | White blood cell decreased | Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 2 | 45 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 3 | 24 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Platelet count decreased | Normal | 74 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Neutrophil count decreased | Normal | 78 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities: Worst Grade Under Treatment (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Lymphocyte count decreased | Normal | 35 Participants |
Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary Analysis
Time frame: From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary Analysis | 1 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With New Primary Malignancies During Study Treatment Till Primary Analysis | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)
Time frame: From post-treatment till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Investigations_Any_Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Investigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Investigations_Any_Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Febrile neutropenia_Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | All system organ classes_Any_Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Investigations_Neutrophil count decreased_Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Post-treatment Chemotherapy Related Adverse Events (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders_Any_Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence (i.e. any unfavorable and unintended sign \[including abnormal laboratory findings\], symptom or disease) in a patient or clinical investigation participant after providing written informed consent for participation in the study. AEs were considered to be treatment-emergent if they started or worsened after first application of study intervention up to 30 days after end of treatment with study intervention. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; another medical important serious event as judged by the investigator and an occurrence of any additional malignancies, including acute myelocytic leukemia or hematological conditions.
Time frame: From first dosing till primary analysis cutoff date, up to 55 months
Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of any study medication (radium 223 dichloride or placebo, exemestane, and everolimus). Participants were assigned to the Radium-223 dichloride arm if they received any dose of Radium-223 dichloride, otherwise to the placebo arm.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Serious TEAE | 57 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Exemestane-related TEAEs | 75 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs | 73 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Everolimus-related TEAEs | 130 Participants |
| Radium-223 + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Any TEAE | 139 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Everolimus-related TEAEs | 125 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Any TEAE | 136 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Serious TEAE | 53 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Radium-223/Placebo-related TEAEs | 50 Participants |
| Placebo + EXE/EVE | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (From First Dosing Till Primary Analysis) | Exemestane-related TEAEs | 64 Participants |