Ovarian Cancer Stage III, Ovarian Cancer Stage IV
Conditions
Keywords
ovarian cancer, imaging, gated PET/CT scan
Brief summary
This study will be the first prospective study enrolling consecutive patients with advanced ovarian cancer to determine the prevalence of thoracic and extra-abdominal involvement in this patient group and the relative value of gated PET and CT for diagnosing extra-abdominal involvement. This study will also answer a number of other stil unanswered questions: the impact of gating and the impact of gated PET on clinical management of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. This study also individualises patients' treatment to allow patients who may benefit most form optimal surgical cytoreduction and those who are better treated by neoadjuvant
Detailed description
This study directly compares standard CT scanning with PET/CT scanning with gating (computer adjusted for breathing excursions) in patients with advanced EOC. The primary objective of this study is to obtain definitive evidence on the value of gated PET/CT compared to current standard imaging (CT scan) for the diagnosis of extra-abdominal and thoracic involvement. This study will give precise estimates on the sensitivity and specificity of CT compared with gated PET/CT, and allow calculation of the positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The proportion of patients upstaged to Stage IV (extra-abdominal involvement) from Stage III by gated PET/CT will be calculated. Secondary objectives are to establish: * The impact of gated PET/CT images on clinical management (changes to planned treatment; detection of metastatic spread to unexpected sites). * The validity of gated PET/CT positive (FDG avid) findings through histological evaluation. * We will also receive information of unusual (unexpected) FDG positive metastatic lesions that would normally not noticed on CT scans. Current standard treatment for patients with advanced EOC is upfront surgery as long as all tumour is confined to the pelvis and the abdomen. Unfortunately, EOC is often found at distant sites where it was not suspected during surgery (which is too late). If the surgeon had had prior knowledge of this disease distribution, the surgeon would not have subjected the patient to a long and invasive surgical procedure. Instead they but would have referred the patient to upfront chemotherapy, which is widely accepted clinical practice throughout Australia. This study aims to increase the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative medical imaging and subject a larger group of patients with advanced EOC to accurate management.
Interventions
PET/CT (without respiratory gating) is performed on an ad-hoc basis in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the lead up to surgery. The sensitivity of PET/CT for detecting low volume pleural disease is likely reduced by respiratory motion during the ten minute acquisition time over the chest. By freezing this respiratory motion with respiratory gating, we hope that gated PET/CT detection of pleural metastases will improve over non-gated PET images.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Female ≥18 years of age * Suspected or histologically/cytologically proven Stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤3 * Negative serum or urine pregnancy test in pre-menopausal women and women \< 2 years after the onset of menopause * Signed written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Estimated life expectancy of \<6 months * Recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer * Laparotomy performed as component of staging/clinical management prior to gated PET/CT being performed. * Unable to provide informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients upstaged from Stage IV from Stage III by gated PET/CT | one to six months | The primary hypothesis is that the true prevalence of extra-abdominal involvement diagnosed by gated PET/CT will be higher than the prevalence deteted by CT. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of gated PET/CT images on clinical management | one to six months | Changes to planned treatment for ovarian cancer based on the detection of metastatic spead to unexpected sites |
| The validity of gated PET/CT positive (FDG avid) findings through histological evaluation | one to six months | — |
Countries
Australia