Skip to content

Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate

Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate in Non-ischemic Heart Failure Patients: a Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02258061
Enrollment
15
Registered
2014-10-07
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bi-ventricular Pacing, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Heart Failure, Quality of Life, Sympathetic Activity

Brief summary

The optimal pacing rate during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is not known. Investigators investigate the impact of changing basal pacing frequencies on autonomic nerve function, cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and self-perceived quality of life (QoL).

Detailed description

This is a double-blinded randomized crossover pilot study testing two basal pacing rates: DDD-60 versus DDD-80. Each patient is paced for 2 periods of 90 days with DDD-60 and DDD-80 in a randomly sequence. Blood samples NT-proBNP plasma levels are analysed at baseline and at the end of each phase using electrochemiluminescence-immunoassay. Patients rest for 15 minutes before the samples are taken. These result are monitored by supervisory group to ensure that increase of more than 15% than baseline values result in termination of study. Investigators conduct two distinct questionnaires (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (LIfHE) questionnaire and Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36)) A symptom limiting bicycle (Ergoline, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) exercise test is performed to measure maximum work capacity and oxygen consumption at each phase. Recordings of resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) are sought in all patients at both rates of pacing. All patients are studied on the same set-up in the semi-recumbent position after 30 minutes of rest. Tungsten microelectrodes (Iowa Bioengineering) are inserted into the common peroneal nerve just below the knee.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDDD-80

Basal pacing rate set to 80-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.

PROCEDUREDDD-60

Basal pacing rate set to 60-bpm. Note:Patients have already pacemaker implanted before this study.

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy * CRT device implanted (with initial indication in accordance with European guidelines) at least 6 months prior to inclusion. * New York Heart Association functional (NYHA) class II-IV * Sinus rhythm, * Hemodynamically stable * Biventricular pacing \> 90% of the time * On optimal medical treatment for heart failure with no changes in medications during the past 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* NYHA I * unable to perform exercise test (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe arthritis) * cancer * plasma creatinine \> 200 micromole per litre * an admission for decompensated HF or acute coronary syndrome in the preceding 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide3 monthsObserving the change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in 15 patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Autonomic nerve function3 monthsAutonomic nerve function by micro-neurography measured in bursts/min and bursts/cardiac cycle in 15 patients
Peak oxygen consumption (pVO2)3 monthspVO2 measured by a symptom limiting bicycle exercise test in 15 patients
Self-perceived quality of life3 monthsMeasured with the LIfHE and SF-36 questionnaires in 15 patients

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026