Skip to content

CT Analysis of the Patellofemoral Joint in Patients Having Knee Surgery

Comparison of a Novel Weight Bearing Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT)Scanner Versus a Conventional CT Scanner for Measuring Patellar Instability

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02257099
Acronym
PF
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-10-06
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2019-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellar (or Kneecap) Instability and Mal-alignment

Brief summary

The primary hypothesis is that measures of patellofemoral alignment obtained from the investigational cone beam CT scanner will be reduced, but still correlated to those obtained from the conventional CT scan.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Carestream Health, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
State University of New York at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have been diagnosed with acute or chronic patellar malalignment. * At least 16 years old * Be willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Open growth plates * Previous knee surgery on the affected knee * Pregnancy (females) * Fracture of the patellofemoral joint * Knee ligament injury (other than medial patellofemoral ligament) * Have greater than Grade II degenerative changes of the patellofemoral joint * Inability to bear weight on the extremity during the CT scan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Congruence Angle CBCTBaseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Tilt AngleBaseline
Tibial Tuberosity Trochlear GrooveBaseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cases
Case-only study, patients with patellar instability or mal-alignment
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCases
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
4 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants
Age, Continuous27.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Congruence Angle CBCT

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CTCongruence Angle CBCT26.7 degreesStandard Deviation 18.1
CBCTCongruence Angle CBCT3 degreesStandard Deviation 30.1
Secondary

Tibial Tuberosity Trochlear Groove

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CTTibial Tuberosity Trochlear Groove12.3 mmStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Tilt Angle

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Conventional CTTilt Angle18.2 degreesStandard Deviation 11.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026