Skip to content

Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol on the Recordings of Deep Brain Activity Measured Through Implanted Stimulators

Effects of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol on the Recordings of Deep Brain Activity (Local Field Potentials) Measured Through Implanted Stimulators

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02256319
Acronym
DEXPROPAR
Enrollment
12
Registered
2014-10-03
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2015-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation, Dexmedetomidine, Propofol

Brief summary

This clinical trial has been designed to study and compare changes in deep brain activity (field potentials) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients while awake, and during sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol. The recording is made through a deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implanted for PD management. The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine produces fewer changes as compared to propofol, and that those changes are consistent and recognizable when compared to activity in patients not exposed to any sedation. Typification of those changes would in the future allow for patients to undergo this surgery comfortably while not compromising the quality of the recording and of the final clinical outcome. The principal variable analyzed is the signal's power in each of the frequency bands, absolute and relative. The analysis will include usual clinical methods such as rapid Fourier transform (FFT) and window fast Fourier transform (WFFT), wavelet analysis, Gabor, and coherence.

Detailed description

Comparative clinical trial, non blinded, controlled and sequential, evaluating the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine in the basal ganglia of PD patients through a DBS electrode. It is a phase IV clinical trial evaluating the effects of a drug outside the approved. The study takes part in three phases: 1. DBS placement under sedation with dexmedetomidine at 0.2 μg/kg/h. This will be called dexmedetomidine record. 2. Four days later and with no sedation, a recording will be registered in one of the specialized electrically isolated rooms at the Neurophysiology Department. This will be dubbed basal recording. The equipment used is also the standard one used for routine postoperative recordings. 3. 5 days after the initial surgery, and following the protocol in place for these procedures, the tunnelization and battery placement will take place. This is done under general anaesthesia. During anaesthetic induction, the patient is exposed to incremental doses of propofol. Different plasmatic concentrations will be targeted using the mathematical model in the target controlled infusion (TCI) pump. These recordings will be called propofol at a 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 μg/mL.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Patients will receive a loading dose of 1 µg/kg in 10 min before starting the surgery. The maintenance dose will be 0.2-1 µg/kg/h for a Ramsey Sedation Score of 3-4 during the surgery´s preparation. It will be reduced to 0.2 µg/kg/h 15 min before starting the microelectrode recording for a Ramsey Sedation Score of 2. After the placement of the deep brain stimulator we will record the local field potentials activity. In addition, the subscales of rigidity, tremor and bradykinesia of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) score will be evaluated. Once the deep brain stimulator recording and neurologic exploration will be over patients will receive a maintenance dose 0.2-1 µg/kg/h until the end of the surgery. It will be stopped to transfer the patient to the ICU.

DRUGPropofol

The target doses are 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 µg/kg. For its administration we will use the TCI (target controlled infusion) system. After programming each dose we will wait until the plasma and brain concentration of propofol are stabilized in this target and then we will record the local field potentials activity through the DBS. In addition, the subscales of rigidity, tremor and bradykinesia of the UPDRS-III score will be evaluated.

Sponsors

Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Capacity to understand, consent and commit for the three phases of the study. * Older than 18 years old. * The patient is scheduled for DBS electrode placement for PD treatment by his neurologist.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy or hypersensibility to dexmedetomidine or propofol * Cardiac blockade (types 2 and 3) without an implanted pacemaker * Low blood pressure (mean \< 60 mmHg) or symptoms of low cardiac output. * Severe cerebrovascular disease. * Pregnancy or nursing mothers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Signal power of the local field potentials.5 minutes for each recordSignal power separated in bandwidth (theta, slow beta, fast beta, gamma, high frequency); absolute and relative. The comparison will be made between the different measurements: dexmedetomidine, basal and propofol.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UPDRS-III score2 minutes for each scoreChanges in UPDRS-III score with dexmedetomidine and propofol

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026