Skip to content

Effect of Lamotrigine on Cognition in NF1

The Effect of Lamotrigine on Cognitive Deficits Associated With Neurofibromatosis Type 1: a Phase II Randomized Controlled Multi-centre Trial (NF1-EXCEL)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02256124
Acronym
NF1-EXCEL
Enrollment
41
Registered
2014-10-03
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2020-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Keywords

Neurofibromatosis type 1, NF1, Cognition, Learning problems, Lamotrigine, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether lamotrigine can improve cognitive and neurophysiological deficits in adolescents with Neurofibromatosis type 1.

Detailed description

Cognitive deficits in the autosomal dominant disorder Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) typically consist of a lower than average IQ, impaired visual-spatial learning, attention problems and impaired executive functioning. These deficits have a substantial influence on the daily life of pediatric and adolescent individuals with NF1. One of the key underlying mechanisms of these deficits is an increased gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic inhibition and a subsequent decrease in synaptic plasticity. The ENCORE laboratory has recently shown that loss of the NF1-gene is associated with attenuated function of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 1 (HCN1). These channels, enriched in membranes of inhibitory interneurons, play an important role in the pathophysiology underlying the cognitive deficits in NF1. Lamotrigine, an HCN-agonist, restored function of HCN1, together with the electrophysiological and visual-spatial learning deficits in Nf1-mice. Thus, lamotrigine is a novel candidate drug for treating cognitive deficits associated with NF1.

Interventions

DRUGLamotrigine
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
CollaboratorOTHER
Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* NF1 patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis * Age 12-17.5 years at inclusion * Oral and written informed consent by parents and assent from participants

Exclusion criteria

* Segmental NF1 * Severe hearing problems or deafness * Severe visual problems or blindness * Use of the following medication, as of interaction with lamotrigine: phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, primidon, rifampicin, atazanavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, oral contraceptive pill including stop-week (estrogen and progesterone) and valproic acid during 3 months before inclusion. * Use of psycho-active medication other than methylphenidate * Previous allergic reactions to anti-epileptic drugs * Epilepsy or epilepsy in the past * Suicidal thoughts or behaviour * Renal insufficiency * Liver insufficiency * Pregnancy * Brain tumour or other brain pathology potentially influencing the outcome measures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Performance intelligence quotient (change from baseline)Baseline and 26 weeksAssessed by the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children - third edition (WISC-III).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual perception (change from baseline)Baseline and 26 weeksAssessed by the Motor Free Visual Perception Test - third edition (MVPT-3).
Sustained attention (change from baseline)Baseline and 26 weeksAssessed by the Sustained Attention DOTS (SA-DOTS) of the Amsterdam Neuropsychological Tasks (ANT).
Visual-motor integration (change from baseline)Baseline and 26 weeksAssessed by the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Task of Visual Motor Integration - sixth edition (Beery-VMI-6).
Fine motor coordination (change from baseline)Baseline and 26 weeksAssessed by the Grooved Pegboard Test.
Visual-spatial working memory (change from baseline)Baseline and 26 weeksAssessed by the Paired Associative Learning (PAL) task of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB).
Executive functioning (change from baseline)Baseline, 26 weeks and 52 weeksAssessed by the Behavior Rating Inventory for Executive Function parent questionnaire (BRIEF).
Short intracortical inhibition (SICI) (change from baseline)Baseline and 10 weeksAssessed by paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS).
Long-term potentiation-like plasticity (change from baseline)Baseline and 10 weeksAssessed by paired associative stimulation (PAS) using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Attention problems (change from baseline)Baseline, 10 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeksAssessed by a parent rated ADHD-questionnaire, the ADHD-vragenlijst (AVL).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Full IQ (Intelligence Quotient)BaselineAssessed by the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for children - third edition (WISC-III).
Educational levelBaseline and 26 weeksDetermined using the ISCED (International Standard Classification of Education) 2011 levels
Adverse event registrationBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 14 weeks, 18 weeks, 26 weeks, 28 weeks and additionally on indication
NF1 disease severityBaselineAssessed by the Riccardi scale.
Physical examinationBaseline, 10 weeks and 26 weeks
Pharmacokinetics: Area under the curve (AUC) and average steady state concentration.10 weeks, 18 weeks and 26 weeksPharmacokinetic model build with NONMEM analysis of trough level, Tmax level and a level 6 hours post-dose.
Kidney functionBaseline and 10 weeksUrea, creatinine
Hepatic enzymesBaseline and 10 weeksALAT, ASAT, GGT
Full blood countBaseline and 10 weeks
Parental educationBaselineDetermined by highest educational grade as measured with the Standaard Onderwijsindeling (SOI) classification by Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek; CBS)
Parental occupationBaselineDetermined by the most appropriate level of education for the particular occupation

Countries

Belgium, Netherlands, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026