Skip to content

Evaluation of a Disposable Flexible Bronchoscope, aScope IV

Evaluation of a Disposable Flexible Bronchoscope, (aScope IV) a Randomized, Controlled, Cross-over Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02255838
Acronym
EVAL
Enrollment
12
Registered
2014-10-03
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
2020-01-14
Last updated
2022-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atelectasis, Pneumonia, Respiratory Insufficiency

Brief summary

Flexible bronchoscopes are typically reusable and therefore need high level disinfection to prevent inadvertent spread of microbial pathogens from patient to patient. The process of disinfection is time consuming and expensive. Moreover, a bronchoscope being processed may not be readily available for another patient. One solution to this problem was to use a single use disposable sheath that covers a flexible bronchoscope protecting all surfaces of the bronchoscope.(Colt, Beamis, Harrell, & Mathur, 2000). Another way to eliminate potential hazards with a reusable bronchoscope is the use of a disposable bronchoscope. Such a disposable bronchoscope has been developed (Ambu aScope, Ambu, Glen Burnie, MD) and has been used successfully for intubations in manikins(Scutt et al., 2011) and patients. (Kristensen & Fredensborg, 2013; Pujol, López, & Valero, 2010; Tvede, Kristensen, & Nyhus-Andreasen, 2012). Further advancement in the imaging and handling of this disposable flexible bronchoscope now allows for the purpose of bronchoscopy and broncho-alveolar lavage in critically ill patients with pulmonary compromise. (FDA approval: 05-11-2013 date) The aim of the study is to compare image clarity, suction capacity, and handling performance of a reusable flexible bronchoscope to the disposable flexible bronchoscope. In addition, the investigators intend to perform a cost analysis.

Detailed description

Description Patients will be monitored by standard NIBP or invasive arterial lines, ECG and oxygen saturation. All patients are intubated due to their respiratory insufficiency or for airway protection. Patients will be anesthetized for the procedure. Anesthesia will be induced with versed 2mg, fentanyl 100 µg and paralyzed with 0.1mg/kg vecuronium. Anesthesia will be maintained with propofol infusion 50-150 µg/kg/min. Study Procedures All patients will be under general anesthesia. Standard monitoring will be applied. This includes a blood pressure cuff or an arterial line, EKG and a pulse-oximeter. Patients will receive 2 mg/kg propofol, 1µg/kg fentanyl and 0.1mg/kg vecuronium for the procedure. After induction of anesthesia the FiO2 will be turned to 1.0 and a bronchoscopy adaptor will be interposed in the breathing circuit next to the endotracheal tube. Patients will be randomized to receiving either the non-disposable bronchoscope (Storz 8402 2x, El Segundo, CA) or the single use aScope 3 first. After randomization, bronchoscopy will be started with an inspection of the trachea and carina. Next the right lung bronchial tree will be inspected systematically beginning with the right upper lobe, following with the right middle lobe and finishing with the right lower lobe. All segmental bronchi will be inspected and cleaned by suction as deemed necessary. The bronchoscope will then be removed from the bronchial tree and rinsed with saline Subsequently, the bronchoscope will be re-inserted and advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope will be brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml will be administered. The flow of saline will be observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction will be applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step will be repeated 4 more times (total of 80ml) to obtain an adequate specimen. The same procedure will be repeated on the left lung using the alternate bronchoscope according to randomization. At the end of the procedure, a chest radiograph will be obtained to rule out pneumothorax. Measurements Before starting the procedure the set up time of each bronchoscope will be recorded. The view, image, and light of each bronchoscope will be assessed, then the inspection of the upper lobe segmental bronchi will be conducted. The time of lavage and suctioning until no more specimen can be collected will be measured. The volume of the obtained specimen will be measured. The specimen will be evaluated by a blinded observer after the procedure is completed.(clear fluids, mucous secretions, viscous secretions, pus, blood etc). The blinded observer will evaluate the quality and quanity of the sample for obtaining cultures.The blinded observer will be an attending or resident from the infectious disease department. The overall ease of handling will be rated directly after the procedure by the investigator. All bronchoscopies will be taped and view-clarity, image and light-brightness will be assessed by a second blinded observer. This blinder observer can be another investigator not present during the procedure or an internist who was not present and is part of the study team. All assessments will be performed using a VAS scale of 0 to 10 cm as shown below. The investigator will mark directly on the scale. We will only enroll patients who were admitted to a critical care unit at the University of Louisville and who are intubated.

Interventions

DEVICEBronchoscope reusable (Storz 8402 2x)

Bronchoscopy and alveolar lavage

DEVICEBronchoscope disposable (aScope 4)

Bronchoscopy and alveolar lavage

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

A blinded investigator will view the bronchoscopy video and evaluate. The blinded investigator will use the same criteria the investigator who did the procedure used (Un-blinded) for the evaluation. Video will not indicate which scope was used and only indicate if it is the right or left lung they are viewing. Research coordinator will keep separate a file indicating which scope was used.

Intervention model description

The disposable aScope IV bronchoscope will be compared to the re-usable bronchoscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult 18 years old and older 2. Capable of giving informed consent or have an acceptable surrogate capable of giving legally authorized consent on the subject's behalf. 3. Indication of a diagnostic and or therapeutic bronchoscopy as determined by the attending critical care physician 4. Being cared for in the critical care units at the U of L Hospital

Exclusion criteria

1\) Patient is moribund and a bronchoscopy is very unlikely to reduce impending mortality or can avert death

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Visualization of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes; a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope10 to 30 minutesVisualization of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as cannot be evaluated and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization
Evaluation of the Handling of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope10-30 minutesHandling of the two bronchoscopes using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as cannot be evaluated and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Ability to Suction With Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope10-30 minutesMeasured suction capability by volume retrieved after broncho-alveolar lavage with 10 ml of saline, measured in ml
Evaluation of Flexibility of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope10-30 minutesFlexibility of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as cannot be evaluated and 10 being assessed as optimal flexibility

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

period August 8, 2015 to July 8, 2017 location: ICU

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Disposable Bronchoscope Insertion Followed by Reusable Bronchoscope Insertion or Vice Versa
Randomly controlled, either the disposable bronchoscope (aScope 4) was inserted first into the trachea and advanced into the right lung. Subsequently, a reusable bronchoscope (Storz 8402) was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the left lung. If randomization assigned the reusable bronchoscope to be inserted first, then the reusable bronchoscope was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the right lung first followed by insertion of the disposable bronchoscope and advancement into the left lung. The subsequent procedure was identical for both parts of this crossover trial and is described as follows: After insertion of the bronchoscope into the bronchial tree the scope was advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right or left lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope was brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml was administered. The flow of saline was observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction was applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step was repeated 4 more times (total of 80 ml) to obtain an adequate specimen.
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDisposable Bronchoscope Insertion Followed by Reusable Bronchoscope Insertion or Vice Versa
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants
Age, Continuous72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Evaluation of the Handling of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope

Handling of the two bronchoscopes using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as cannot be evaluated and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization

Time frame: 10-30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bronchoscope Disposable, aScope IVEvaluation of the Handling of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope8.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Reusable Bronchoscope (Storz 8402)Evaluation of the Handling of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope8.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Primary

Evaluation of Visualization of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes; a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope

Visualization of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as cannot be evaluated and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization

Time frame: 10 to 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bronchoscope Disposable, aScope IVEvaluation of Visualization of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes; a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Reusable Bronchoscope (Storz 8402)Evaluation of Visualization of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes; a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope8.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Evaluation of Ability to Suction With Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope

Measured suction capability by volume retrieved after broncho-alveolar lavage with 10 ml of saline, measured in ml

Time frame: 10-30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bronchoscope Disposable, aScope IVEvaluation of Ability to Suction With Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope5.4 milliliterStandard Deviation 0.9
Reusable Bronchoscope (Storz 8402)Evaluation of Ability to Suction With Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope5.3 milliliterStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Evaluation of Flexibility of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope

Flexibility of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as cannot be evaluated and 10 being assessed as optimal flexibility

Time frame: 10-30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bronchoscope Disposable, aScope IVEvaluation of Flexibility of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope8.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Reusable Bronchoscope (Storz 8402)Evaluation of Flexibility of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026