Skip to content

Shamrock Versus Lumbar Ultrasound Trident - Ultrasound Guided Block of the Lumbar Plexus

Shamrock Versus Lumbar Ultrasound Trident - Ultrasound Guided Block of the Lumbar Plexus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02255591
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-10-02
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia Local, Hip Fractures, Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

Hip surgery anesthesia, Perioperative analgesia

Brief summary

The main objective of the trial is to complete a double-blinded randomized controlled trial of a lumbar plexus block with the Shamrock technique versus the Lumbar Ultrasound Trident technique by estimating the time of performance of lumbar plexus blocks in healthy volunteers. Secondary objectives include a) estimates of number and depth of needle injections, distance of injection site from the midline, minimal electric nerve stimulation to trigger muscular response and the type of response, and volunteer discomfort during block injection, b) measurements of plasma lidocaine and mean arterial blood pressure, c) examinations of sensory block of the dermatomes T8-S3 and motor block of the femoral nerve, the obturator nerve, the hip abductor muscles, and the hamstring muscles, d) success rate of lumbar plexus block, e) perineural and epidural distribution of local anesthetics added contrast visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, and f) cost-effectiveness for the Shamrock technique versus the Lumbar Ultrasound Trident Technique for lumbar plexus block in healthy volunteers. The hypothesis is that the Shamrock technique is faster to perform than the Lumbar Ultrasound technique, and that the success rate of the Shamrock technique is equal to or higher than the Lumbar Ultrasound Trident technique.

Interventions

DRUGLidocaine-adrenaline added gadolinium.

Sponsors

AP Moeller Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male * Age ≥ 18 years * Volunteers who have given their written and oral consent to participate in the study after fully understanding the content and the limitations of the protocol * Normal healthy volunteer (American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Classification I)

Exclusion criteria

* Volunteers not able to cooperate for the study * Volunteers not able to understand Danish * Daily use of analgesics * Allergy against the medicines used in the study * Drug abuse (according to the investigator's judgement) * Alcohol consumption larger than the recommendations of the Danish National Board of Health * Volunteers in whom nerve blocks are not possible due to technical reasons * Volunteers who meet any contraindication for MRI including claustrophobia * Volunteers who are incompetent, i.e. surrogate consent is not accepted

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Block performance timeEstimated 0 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Time for performance of lumbar plexus block in seconds from placement of the ultrasound transducer on the skin until the block needle is pulled out after injection of local anesthetics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Discomfort during block placementEstimated 1 minute after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Discomfort is measured with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
Plasma LidocaineBlood samples are withdrawn 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.
Mear arterial pressureMeasured 5 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.
Cost-effectivenessCalculated two weeks after the last visit of the last volunteer. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Cost-effectiveness estimated as extra expense per successful lumbar plexus block and calculated as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Sensor blockTested 30 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Sensor block (cold, warm, touch, and pain) of the dermatomes T8-S3 and of the femoral nerve and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve.
Motor blockTested 40 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Motor block of the femoral nerve (knee extension), the obturator nerve (hip adduction), the superior gluteal nerve (hip abduction), and the sciatic nerve (knee flexion) estimated as active resistance against movement of the relevant joint and with sphygmomanometer of the relevant joint as maximal voluntary isometric contraction with dynamometer (mmHg).
Number of needle feedsEstimated 0 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Needle feeds are defined as retraction of needle followed by new feed of the needle disregarding the number of skin punctures.
Epidural spread of local anesthetics with contrastEstimated 10-30 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Estimated with T1- and T2-weighted and with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) MR scanning.
Perineural spread of local anesthetics with added contrastEstimated 10-30 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Estimated with T1- and T2-weighted and with DWI MR scanning.
Depth of block needleEstimated during blockThe depth in cm from the injection site in the skin to the needle tips position during injection. of local anesthetics
Injection siteEstimated immediately after block placementThe distance in cm from the injection site of the block needle to the midline of the volunteer.
Minimal electrical nerve stimulationEstimated immediately before injection of local anesthetics during block placementThe estimated minimal electrical nerve stimulation in mA to trigger a muscular response.
Type of response on electrical nerve stimulationAssessed immediately before injection of local anesthetics during block placementThe type of response triggered by electrical nerve stimulation.
Block success rateTested 30 minutes after block placement. Presented 10 months after the last visit of the last volunteer.Success rate defined as motor block of the femoral nerve (knee extension) and the obturator nerve (hip adduction) and reduced sensory of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (middle of the lateral side of the thigh).

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026