Skip to content

A Study to Learn About the Effects and Safety of RTA 408 (Omaveloxolone) in People Aged 16 to 40 With Friedreich's Ataxia

A Phase 2 Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamics of RTA 408 in the Treatment of Friedreich's Ataxia (MOXIe)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02255435
Enrollment
172
Registered
2014-10-02
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2025-12-19
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Friedreich Ataxia

Keywords

RTA 408, RTA 408 Capsules, Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial dysfunction, omaveloxolone

Brief summary

In this study, researchers are learning more about RTA 408, also known as omaveloxolone, BIIB141, or SKYCLARYS®. The main goal of this study is to learn more about the safety of RTA 408 and how it affects physical effort, movement, coordination, and how participants feel in daily life. The main questions researchers want to answer in this study are: * How much physical effort can a participant produce during a cycling test after 12 weeks of treatment? * How do scores on the modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) change after 48 weeks? Researchers will use the modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) to measure how FA affects the nervous system. The mFARS looks at movement ability, balance, coordination, speech, and how well the arms and legs work. They will also use a cycling test to measure physical effort, along with questionnaires to learn how participants feel and function in daily life. Safety will also be tested using physical exams, vital sign checks, echocardiograms (ECHO), electrocardiograms (ECG), and blood and urine tests. The study will be done in 2 main parts, followed by an optional Extension period: * In Part 1, participants will be randomly assigned to take different doses of RTA 408 or a placebo by mouth once a day for 12 weeks. A placebo looks like the study drug but contains no real medicine. * Researchers will compare these doses to decide which one to use in Part 2. * In Part 2, a different group of participants will take either the chosen dose of RTA 408 (150 mg) or placebo once a day for 48 weeks. * Participants who complete Part 1 or Part 2 may be able to join an Extension period, where everyone receives RTA 408. * In the Extension period, participants will continue to receive RTA 408 until the drug becomes commercially available or until they leave the study * Participants in Part 1 will have up to 9 study visits and 2 phone calls. If they do not move onto the Extension period, they will stay in the study for up to 20 weeks. * Participants in Part 2 will have up to 10 study visits and 3 phone calls. If they do not move onto the Extension period, they will stay in the study for up to 61 weeks. * Participants in the Extension period will have 2 visits in the first month, followed by visits every 6 months.

Detailed description

Friedreich's ataxia is an autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia caused by triplet-repeat expansions. The causative mutation is a trinucleotide (GAA) repeat expansion in the first intron of the frataxin gene, leading to impaired transcription of frataxin. The pathological consequences of frataxin deficiency include a severe disruption of iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis, mitochondrial iron overload coupled to cellular iron dysregulation, and an increased sensitivity to oxidative stress. A hallmark of Friedreich's ataxia is impairment of antioxidative defense mechanisms, which play a major role in disease progression. Studies have demonstrated that nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling is grossly impaired in participants with Friedreich's ataxia. Therefore, the ability of omaveloxolone (RTA 408) to activate Nrf2 and induce antioxidant target genes is hypothesized to be therapeutic in participants with Friedreich's ataxia. This 2-part study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of omaveloxolone (RTA 408) in the treatment of participants with Friedreich's ataxia. Part 1: The first part of this study will be a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety of omaveloxolone (RTA 408) at various doses in participants with Friedreich's ataxia. Part 2: The second part of this study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omaveloxolone (RTA 408) 150 mg in participants with Friedreich's ataxia. Participants enrolled in Part 2 will be randomized 1:1 to receive omaveloxolone (RTA 408) 150 mg or placebo. Extension: The extension will assess long-term safety and tolerability of omaveloxolone (RTA 408) in qualified participants with Friedreich's ataxia following completion of Part 1 or Part 2. Participants will not be unblinded to study treatment in Part 1 or Part 2 upon entering the extension study. Participants will receive open-label omaveloxolone (RTA 408) at 150 mg once daily.

Interventions

Sponsors

Biogen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
AbbVie
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Have genetically confirmed Friedreich's ataxia 2. Have a modified FARS score ≥20 and ≤80 3. Be male or female and ≥16 years of age and ≤40 years of age 4. Have no changes to exercise regimen within 30 days prior to Study Day 1 and be willing to remain on the same exercise regimen during the 16-week study period 5. Have the ability to complete maximal exercise testing 6. Be able to swallow capsules

Exclusion criteria

1. Have uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c \>11.0%) 2. Have B-type natriuretic peptide value \>200 pg/mL 3. Have a history of clinically significant left-sided heart disease and/or clinically significant cardiac disease 4. Have known active fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection, including human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis virus (B or C) 5. Have known or suspected active drug or alcohol abuse 6. Have clinically significant abnormalities of clinical hematology or biochemistry, including but not limited to elevations greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal of aspartate aminotransferase, or alanine aminotransferase 7. Have any abnormal laboratory test value or serious pre-existing medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the patient at risk by study enrollment 8. Have taken any of the following drugs within 7 days prior to Study Day 1 or plan to take any of these drugs during the time of study participation: 1. Sensitive substrates for cytochrome P450 2C8 or 3A4 (e.g., repaglinide, midazolam, sildenafil) 2. Moderate or strong inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 (e.g., carbamazepine, phenytoin, ciprofloxacin, grapefruit juice) 3. Substrates for p-glycoprotein transporter (e.g., ambrisentan, digoxin) 9. Have participated in any other interventional clinical study within 30 days prior to Study Day 1 10. Have a cognitive impairment that may preclude ability to comply with study procedures 11. Prior participation in a trial with omaveloxolone (RTA 408)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Peak Work During Maximal Exercise Testing at Week 12Baseline, Week 12Cycle ergometry using a recumbent stationary bicycle was used to conduct maximal exercise testing and workload was increased incrementally. Peak work is defined as the workload at which participants reach maximal volition (defined as an inability to continue to exercise due to exhaustion). A positive change from baseline suggests an improvement.
Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)From first dose of study drug up to end of Part 1 of the study (up to Week 16)An adverse event (AE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including any clinically significant abnormal laboratory test result), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered to be study drug related. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of the Investigator, placed the participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. TEAEs were defined as any AEs, regardless of relationship to study drug, that had an onset or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS) is a neurological-exam-based rating scale with five sections: Bulbar (section A), Upper Limb Coordination (section B), Lower Limb Coordination (section C), Peripheral Nervous System (section D), and Upright Stability (section E). mFARS is the sum of sections A (score 0 to 11), B (score 0 to 36), C (score 0 to 16), and E (score 0 to 36). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 99. A lower score indicates better neurological function.
Part 2: Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEsFrom first dose of study drug up to end of Part 2 of the study (up to Week 52)An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including any clinically significant abnormal laboratory test result), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the study drug whether or not it is considered to be study drug related. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of the Investigator, placed the participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. TEAEs were defined as any AEs, regardless of relationship to study drug, that had an onset or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the mFARS at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The FARS is a neurological-exam-based rating scale with five sections: Bulbar (section A), Upper Limb Coordination (section B), Lower Limb Coordination (section C), Peripheral Nervous System (section D), and Upright Stability (section E). mFARS is the sum of sections A (score 0 to 11), B (score 0 to 36), C (score 0 to 16), and E (score 0 to 36). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 99. A lower score indicates better neurological function.
Part 2: Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Week 48The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that requires participants to assess how much their illness has improved or worsened relative to their baseline state at the beginning of the trial. Participants self-rated their perceived change by completing the following statement: "Since I began trial treatment, my overall status is:" 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse and 7=Very much worse. Lower score indicates better improvement. The categories with at least one participant having a PGI-C score are reported.
Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)Week 48The CGIC scale is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of an intervention. The CGIC was assessed by completing the following statement "Compared to the participant's condition at the start of the trial, this participant's overall status is", where 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse. Lower score indicates better improvement. The categories with at least one participant having a CGIC score are reported.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Performance on a 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The 9-HPT is a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity (arm and hand) function. Both the dominant and nondominant hands were tested twice (2 consecutive trials of the dominant hand, followed immediately by 2 consecutive trials of the nondominant hand). The participant picks up pegs 1 at a time (9 in total), using 1 hand only, and places them into holes on the board as quickly as possible, in any order until all holes are filled. Then, without pausing, the participant removes the pegs 1 at a time and returns them as quickly as possible. The times recorded for the two trials for each hand are averaged, and the reciprocal average value for each hand was used in analyses. Longer test times reflect more impairment on the participant's upper extremity function, thus a negative change from baseline suggests an improvement.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Performance on a 25-Foot Timed Walk Test (T25-FWT) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The T25-FWT is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on time (in seconds) to complete a 25-foot walk. Participants were instructed to attempt two T25-FWT trials at each visit. Both walk times were averaged, and the reciprocal average value was used in analyses. Longer test times reflect more impairment on the participant's ability to walk, thus a negative change from baseline suggests an improvement.
Part 2: Total Number of FallsUp to Week 48A fall was defined as "the participant unintentionally coming to rest on the ground or at a lower level." The total number of falls before and after study drug administration has been reported.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Peak Work During Maximal Exercise Testing at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Cycle ergometry using a recumbent stationary bicycle was used to conduct maximal exercise testing and workload was increased incrementally. Peak work is defined as the workload at which participants reach maximal volition (defined as an inability to continue to exercise due to exhaustion). A positive change from baseline suggests an improvement.
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The ADL scale examines the ability of participants to complete everyday tasks (e.g., holding a fork, dressing). The ADL is a 9-question assessment, with the total score being the sum of 9 questions. The ADL survey assesses 9 concepts: (1) speech; (2) swallowing; (3) cutting food and handling utensils; (4) dressing; (5) personal hygiene; (6) falling; (7) walking; (8) quality of sitting position; and (9) bladder function. Each of these is rated on a 5-point scale where 0= normal and 4= severe disability/inability to carry out activity independently, for a total possible score of 0 to 36, with higher scores representing greater disability/dependency. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Italy, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at multiple investigative sites from 31 January 2015 to 19 December 2025.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 172 participants diagnosed with Friedreich's Ataxia (FA) were enrolled in this study. The study consists of 3 parts: Part 1, Part 2, and the Open-Label Extension (OLE) period. Out of the 68 participants who completed Part 1 and 96 participants who completed Part 2, 57 participants from Part 1 and 92 participants from Part 2 entered the OLE period, and 105 participants completed the OLE period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 2.5 mg administered orally one daily for 2 weeks, then 5 mg administered orally once daily for 10 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 2.5 mg Omaveloxolone Capsules, 5 mg
6
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 10 mg administered orally once daily for 12 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 10 mg
6
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 20 mg administered orally once daily for 12 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 20 mg
6
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 40 mg administered orally once daily for 12 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 40 mg
6
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 80 mg administered orally once daily for 12 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 80 mg
6
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 160 mg administered orally once daily for 12 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 160 mg
12
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 300 mg administered orally once daily for 12 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 300 mg
10
Part 1 Placebo Capsules
Placebo capsules administered orally once daily for 12 weeks Placebo
17
Part 2 Placebo Capsules
Placebo capsules administered orally once daily for 48 weeks Placebo
52
Part 2 Omaveloxolone Capsules 150 mg
Omaveloxolone (RTA 408) Capsules, 150 mg administered orally once daily for 48 weeks Omaveloxolone Capsules, 150 mg
51
Total172

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mgPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mgPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mgPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mgPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mgPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mgPart 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mgPart 1 Placebo CapsulesPart 2 Placebo CapsulesPart 2 Omaveloxolone Capsules 150 mgTotal
Age, Continuous25.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.98
25.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
28.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
27.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
24.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
25.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.51
25.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.24
24.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.74
23.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.08
24.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.85
24.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.84
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants5 Participants6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants10 Participants16 Participants49 Participants49 Participants165 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants11 Participants10 Participants16 Participants50 Participants50 Participants167 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants3 Participants5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants31 Participants17 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants3 Participants7 Participants5 Participants7 Participants20 Participants35 Participants87 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 120 / 100 / 170 / 510 / 520 / 1060 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 65 / 65 / 66 / 66 / 611 / 1210 / 1016 / 1751 / 5150 / 52103 / 10642 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 120 / 102 / 175 / 513 / 5212 / 10613 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1

Peak work attained during maximal exercise testing. Cycle ergometry using a recumbent stationary bicycle was used, and workload was increased incrementally. Peak work is defined as the workload at which patients reach maximal volition (defined as an inability to continue to exercise due to exhaustion).

Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks after participant receives the first dose in Part 1.

Population: All randomized patients in Part 1, whether or not they received study drug

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 10.14 W/kg
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 10.07 W/kg
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 1-0.09 W/kg
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 10.06 W/kg
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 10 W/kg
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 10.02 W/kg
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mgChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 10.07 W/kg
Part 1 Placebo CapsulesChange From Baseline in Peak Work (in Watts/kg) During Exercise Testing at Week 12 in Part 10.04 W/kg
p-value: 0.152495% CI: [-0.04, 0.23]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.708695% CI: [-0.11, 0.16]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.065195% CI: [-0.26, 0.01]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.793795% CI: [-0.12, 0.15]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.558795% CI: [-0.18, 0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.728595% CI: [-0.13, 0.09]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.580295% CI: [-0.09, 0.15]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Comparison of Omaveloxolone capsules pooled with Placebo capsulesp-value: 0.969895% CI: [-0.08, 0.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Change in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48 in Part 2

The mFARS includes 4 of the 5 sections of the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS): bulbar (score 0 to 11), upper limb coordination (score 0 to 36), lower limb coordination (score 0 to 16), and upright stability (score 0 to 36). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 99. A lower score indicates better neurological function.

Time frame: 48 weeks after participant receives the first dose in Part 2

Population: Full analysis set (all patients in Part 2 randomized without pes cavus who have at least one post-baseline measurement)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48 in Part 20.85 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 48 in Part 2-1.55 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.689
p-value: 0.014195% CI: [-4.31, -0.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1

The mFARS includes 4 of the 5 sections of the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS): bulbar (score 0 to 11), upper limb coordination (score 0 to 36), lower limb coordination (score 0 to 16), and upright stability (score 0 to 36). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 99. A lower score indicates better neurological function.

Time frame: 12 weeks after participant receives the first dose in Part 1

Population: All randomized patients in Part 1, whether or not they received study drug

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 2.5 and 5 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-3.26 score on a scale
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 10 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-1.97 score on a scale
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 20 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-2.44 score on a scale
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 40 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-2.4 score on a scale
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 80 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-2.88 score on a scale
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 160 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-3.75 score on a scale
Part 1 Omaveloxolone Capsules 300 mgChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-0.88 score on a scale
Part 1 Placebo CapsulesChange in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) at Week 12 in Part 1-1.43 score on a scale
p-value: 0.23195% CI: [-4.8, 1.18]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.729895% CI: [-3.51, 2.47]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.510295% CI: [-3.99, 2]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.528195% CI: [-3.94, 2.04]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.345895% CI: [-4.42, 1.57]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.058795% CI: [-4.68, 0.09]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.64895% CI: [-1.94, 3.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Comparison of Omaveloxolone capsules pooled with Placebo capsulesp-value: 0.217495% CI: [-2.87, 0.66]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026