Skip to content

COPD: Oral Nutrition Supplements vs. Energy- and Protein Dense in Between Meal Snacks.

Oral Nutrition Supplements vs. Energy- and Protein Dense in Between Meal Snacks, Weight Changes and Functional Capacity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Randomized Controlled Dietary Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02251496
Acronym
COPD
Enrollment
34
Registered
2014-09-29
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2021-01-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malnutrition

Keywords

Malnutrition, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Nutrition Therapy, Oral Nutrition Supplement, Food

Brief summary

At least one fifth of patients in European hospitals are malnourished. Malnutrition is associated with negative consequences, including higher rates of complications, longer hospital stay, impaired wound healing and increased mortality with consequent effects on costs of healthcare. Evidence suggests that there may be benefits to some malnourished patients from receiving oral nutrition supplements in the short-term but it is not known whether these benefits can be sustained and indeed whether similar benefits may be achieved using food-based interventions of lower cost. The overall objective of the study is to compare two nutritional interventions among malnourished patients with COPD (n=200); oral nutrition supplement (ONS) vs. energy and protein dense in-between meals snack during hospitalisation and at home. Subjects will be followed for one year. The primary endpoint is weight change. Secondary endpoints include forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vital capacity, six-minute walk distance, hand-grip strength, health related quality of life, length of hospital stay, energy- and protein intake, readmissions to the hospital and acute exacerbation. No studies are available comparing the supply of ONS to malnourished patients with COPD compared with the provision of regular food (in-between meals snacks). The results of the study will provide important information that might improve nutrition care in the hospital setting as well as after discharge from the hospital

Detailed description

Patients with established COPD admitted to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine at Landspitali National University Hospital from September 2014-September 2016 will be screened for malnutrition using the NRS2002 screening tool, recommended by ESPEN. Those identified at risk of malnutrition and are able to give informed consent will be recruited. According to the Hospital statistics and previous studies on the frequency of malnutrition in this patient group, the time frame for recruitment is long enough to recruit 200 subjects who will be randomised into the two study groups (\ 3 subjects per week). The following baseline data will be collected in order to identify possible confounders. This will include; socio-demographic data (age, gender, civil status, household size, family and social network); major medical diagnosis; use of medication; GOLD score (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease), depressive symptoms, cognition), additional discharge interventions (e.g. outgoing hospital teams, day care with exercise); and use of oral nutritional supplements. Inclusion criteria are: * Newly admitted patients \> 18 years old who were at nutritional risk according to the validated nutritional risk screening tool (NRS-2002, score 3+) * Able to eat orally * An anticipated length of hospitalization of \> 3 days * Sufficient language proficiency Exclusion criteria are: * Dysphagia * Food allergy or intolerance * Anatomical obstructions preventing oral food intake Exclusion during follow-up: Subjects who withdraw their consent to participate. Outcome measures: The primary endpoint is weight changes up to one year from admission to the hospital. Secondary endpoints include forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), six-minute walk distance, hand-grip strength, health related quality of life (HRQoL), length of hospital stay, nutritional status, energy- and protein intake, readmissions to the hospital in within 30 days, as well as the total number of readmissions to the hospital and acute exacerbation during follow-up. Functional outcome measurements will be conducted by trained research assistant in collaboration with the PhD student. Information about background diets, HRQoL as well as compliance to the intervention diets will be gathered by the PhD and MS students. Measurements will be conducted at admission to the hospital (baseline measurements) and before discharge from the hospital. Clinical examinations at Landspitali National University Hospital are planned 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from the hospital. All together we aim at having five measurement points for each subject. Each examination will take \ 80 minutes (30 min for the FEV1 and FVC tests, 20 min for the walking test and measurement of hand-grip strength, and 30 min for the 24-hour recalls and HRQoL questionnaires). Additionally, the subjects will be contacted on at least two other occasions by phone, in weeks 2 and 6 (each interview \ 20 min).

Interventions

OTHERIn between meals snacks (Snacks-group)

In between meals snacks (Snacks-group): The subjects in this group will be provided with and encouraged to select in-between-meals snacks providing \ 600 kcal/d in addition to the hospital food (during hospitalisation) or in addition to their daily diet at home (after discharge from the hospital).

OTHEROral nutrition supplement (ONS-group)

The subjects in this group will be provided with and encouraged to take two ready to drink oral nutrition supplements (ONS) daily, providing \ 600 kcal/d in addition to the hospital food (during hospitalisation) or in addition to their daily diet at home (after discharge from the hospital).

Sponsors

University of Iceland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newly admitted patients \> 18 years old who were at nutritional risk according to the validated nutritional risk screening tool (NRS-2002, score 3+) * Able to eat orally * An anticipated length of hospitalization of \> 3 days * Sufficient language proficiency

Exclusion criteria

* Dysphagia * Food allergy or intolerance * Anatomical obstructions preventing oral food intake Exclusion during follow-up: Subjects who withdraw their consent to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Weight Changesbaseline and one year from admission to the hospitalWeight changes from baseline and one year from admission to the hospital

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)baseline and one year from admission to the hospitalSaint George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ) This validated questionnaire is based on 76 items used to calculate three component scores: symptoms, activity and impact, and a total score. A score of 100 represents worst possible health status and a score of 0 represents best possible health status. A change of 4 points in the SGRQ total score is considered the minimum clinically relevant difference.

Countries

Iceland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oral Nutrition Supplement (ONS-group)
The subjects in this group will be provided with and encouraged to take two ready to drink oral nutrition supplements (ONS) daily, providing \ 600 kcal/d in addition to the hospital food (during hospitalisation) or in addition to their daily diet at home (after discharge from the hospital). Oral nutrition supplement (ONS-group): The subjects in this group will be provided with and encouraged to take two ready to drink oral nutrition supplements (ONS) daily, providing \ 600 kcal/d in addition to the hospital food (during hospitalisation) or in addition to their daily diet at home (after discharge from the hospital).
19
In Between Meals Snacks (Snacks-group)
In between meals snacks (Snacks-group): The subjects in this group will be provided with and encouraged to select in-between-meals snacks providing \ 600 kcal/d in addition to the hospital food (during hospitalisation) or in addition to their daily diet at home (after discharge from the hospital). In between meals snacks (Snacks-group): In between meals snacks (Snacks-group): The subjects in this group will be provided with and encouraged to select in-between-meals snacks providing \ 600 kcal/d in addition to the hospital food (during hospitalisation) or in addition to their daily diet at home (after discharge from the hospital).
15
Total34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral Nutrition Supplement (ONS-group)In Between Meals Snacks (Snacks-group)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
19 Participants15 Participants34 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
BMI19.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
18.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
18.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Iceland
19 participants15 participants34 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants11 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Weight54 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
49 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
51.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 193 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 190 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Weight Changes

Weight changes from baseline and one year from admission to the hospital

Time frame: baseline and one year from admission to the hospital

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Nutrition Supplement (ONS-group)Weight Changes2.3 kgStandard Deviation 4.6
In Between Meals Snacks (Snacks-group)Weight Changes4.4 kgStandard Deviation 6.4
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score (SGRQ) This validated questionnaire is based on 76 items used to calculate three component scores: symptoms, activity and impact, and a total score. A score of 100 represents worst possible health status and a score of 0 represents best possible health status. A change of 4 points in the SGRQ total score is considered the minimum clinically relevant difference.

Time frame: baseline and one year from admission to the hospital

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Nutrition Supplement (ONS-group)Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
In Between Meals Snacks (Snacks-group)Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026