Skip to content

MRI Perfusion on T1 and T2 Brain Lesion(s)

Comparison of MRI Sequences T1 and T2 * Cerebral Perfusion to Aid in the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Brain Therapeutic Response With Chemotherapy or Targeted Therapy(s) Lesion(s) in Patients Treated and Followed for a Pulmonary Neoplasia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02250755
Acronym
METAPERF
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-09-26
Start date
2013-06-01
Completion date
2015-11-01
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Carcinoma Metastatic to the Brain

Keywords

MRI perfusion, therapeutic response, chemotherapy, brain metastases

Brief summary

This study therefore aims to assess current treatment recommended by scientific societies \[ 6-13 \] , brain MRI with injection of contrast for the diagnosis and monitoring of brain metastases . The recommended dose of this examination gadolinium is from 0.1 to 0.3 mmol / kg \[ 14 \] . Sequences infusion different from one center to the other made : some use the infusion T1, other infusion T2 \* . No recommendation establishes whether it is preferable to use one or the other of these sequences. No examination is added for the purposes of protocol. Indications for MRI and the number and timing of MRI checks under this protocol are consistent with what is done in practice . The used type of gadolinium and the injected dose will be identical for both sequences infusion . The assessment shall not in any case the contrast but the interpretation of the sequence itself. Special procedures monitoring implemented embodiment correspond to the two sequences instead of infusion (one of T1-weighted and T2 \* in the other ) , in the original MRI and MRI of the first control , in order to compare their effectiveness

Detailed description

Eligibility criteria: * Major Patients * Addressed MRI for initial assessment of brain metastases * At a suspicion of one or more brain metastases in the brain scanner routine screening * Follow for lung cancer histologically documented * In the Thoracic Oncology Service Professor Lafitte (contact: Dr Cortot) * To whom treatment with chemotherapy or targeted therapy (including anti-angiogenic) is considered * Be socially insured Main Outcomes measures: Comparing the area under the ROC curve of different parameters evaluated in T1 and T2 \* perfusion during the initial assessment for the diagnosis of maximal tumor response evaluated at 1 year

Interventions

OTHERMRI T1 T2 sequences

MRI

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Major Patients * Addressed to MRI for initial assessment of brain metastases * At a suspicion of one or more brain metastases in the brain scanner routine screening * Followed for lung cancer histologically documented in the Thoracic Oncology Service of Professor Lafitte (contact: Dr Cortot) * To whom treatment with chemotherapy or targeted therapy (including anti-angiogenic) is considered * Be socially insured-

Exclusion criteria

* Absolute contraindication to MRI (pacemaker, implantable pacemaker, metallic foreign body intraorbital) * Patients minors under guardianship / curatorship * Patients with impaired judgment skills or unable to receive information * Pregnant Women * Patients for which lesions are not compatible with lung metastases * Patients with brain metastases or already known and explored MRI * Patients for whom treatment by surgical excision of brain metastases is considered

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing different parameters evaluated in T1 and T2 * perfusion3 yearsComparing the area under the ROC curve of different parameters evaluated in T1 and T2 \* perfusion during the initial assessment for the diagnosis of maximal tumor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation tumor response1 yearComparison of the area under the ROC curve of the change in the first control of the various parameters measured in T1 and T2 \* infusion, for the diagnosis of maximum tumor response evaluated at 1 year
Radiological progression-free survival1 yearComparison of the ability of the two sequences to predict infusion:
Survival without neurological signs1 yearComparison of the ability of the two sequences to predict infusion:

Countries

France

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORXavier LECLERC, Professor

CHRU of Lille

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026