Skip to content

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Premedication in Children

Comparing Intranasal Dexmedetomidine With Oral Midazolam as Premedication for Older Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Rehabilitation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02250703
Enrollment
75
Registered
2014-09-26
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Preoperative Sedation

Keywords

Premedication

Brief summary

BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RATIONALE Pediatric patients scheduled for dental procedures under general anesthesia can have significant anxiety before the procedure. They are commonly pre medicated to minimize distress and to facilitate a smooth induction of anesthesia. Oral Midazolam at 0.5mg/kg dose is more widely used for this purpose . However the commonly used maximum dose is up to 15mg. It also has many limitations such as paradoxical reaction, increased incidence of emergence delirium and negative postoperative behavior changes . Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been used an effective and safe alternative premedication to oral midazolam in children. At a dose of 2micrograms/kg, intranasal dexmedetomidine as premedication resulted in excellent sedation in children aged 5-8yrs with no adverse hemodynamic effects. It has other advantages such as providing analgesia and facilitating smooth emergence from anesthesia. The goal of this study is to find out if intranasal dexmedetomidine is a superior alternative as premedication to oral midazolam in children weighing more than 20kg undergoing general anesthesia for dental rehabilitation.

Detailed description

After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and written informed consent from patients' parents or legally authorized representative, 80 children older than 5yrs and weighing more than 20kg, ASA physical status 1 or 2, scheduled for elective dental rehabilitation with general anesthesia will be enrolled in this prospective randomized double blinded study. Exclusion criteria include known allergy or hypersensitivity to midazolam or dexmedetomidine, uncorrected congenital heart disease or history of cardiac arrhythmia, children at risk for airway obstruction (OSA or cranio facial syndrome) and pregnant minors Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups M (midazolam) or D (dexmedetomidine) using computer-generated numbers in sealed envelopes. All the patients will be brought to their pre-op room and premedicated at least 30 min before induction of anesthesia. In M group, patients will be given oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg (5mg/ml parenteral preparation) mixed with flavored syrup. In D group, patients will be given intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg prepared from 100mcg/ml parenteral preparation (Hospira R). The drug will be administered using a intranasal mucosal administration device (LMA MAD NasalTM). Atomized nasal medications offer rapid absorption across mucosal membranes to the blood stream avoiding first-pass metabolism. Parents will be present in the room during premedication. The Anesthesia personnel involved in the care of the patient (MD or CRNA) will prepare and administer all study drugs. All patients will be continuously monitored in the holding area with pulse oximetry and blood pressure monitor. HR, SPO2 and BP will be recorded every 15min after administration of premedication until transfer to the OR. Emergency medications including atropine and epinephrine will be immediately available in the pre-op holding area. Oral midazolam has been used with very little effect on hemodynamic parameters. Although intranasal dexmedetomidine can decrease HR and BP, it has been used at the dose of 2mcg/kg without any adverse hemodynamic effect . Any intervention needed to treat drop in HR (\<50) and BP (sys BP \<60) after the drug administration will be recorded. Behavior of the children at the time of premedication will be documented ( easy or difficult). Any unwanted effects during administration such as spitting or vomiting of oral drug and pain or irritation from nasal administration will be documented. The dental resident blinded to study drug administration will do the pre-operative sedation status and acceptance of mask induction. Sedation status will be assessed using University of Michigan sedation scale (UMSS)on separation from parents and at induction after moving to the OR table. Acceptance of mask induction will be documented on a 4-point scale. Standard ASA monitors will be applied before induction of anesthesia. All patients will undergo mask induction with O2/N2O/Sevo. An intravenous line will be inserted and secured. Both nostrils will be prepped nasal drops and tips of tracheal tubes covered with red rubber to minimize bleeding. Nasal intubation will be performed with direct laryngoscopy and McGill's forceps. Appropriate size cuffed tracheal tubes will be inserted and secured after additional IV medications with propofol 2-3mg/kg and fentanyl 1-2mcg/kg. Anesthesia will be maintained with O2/Sevo, IV morphine 0.05 to 0.1mg/kg and IV toradol 0.5mg/kg (if there is no allergy or contraindication to morphine or toradol) After the completion of procedure, patients will be extubated in the operating room and brought to recovery room and allowed to wake up slowly in the recovery position. PACU nurses will evaluate Behavior at awakening using four-point wake up score (9,20). Patients will also be asked if they remember mask induction (yes or no) when they are ready for discharge. Incidence of nausea, vomiting, shivering will be documented in PACU. Time spent in phase 1 recovery room will also be recorded .

Interventions

DRUGMidazolam

oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg

DRUGDexmedetomidine

intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg

Sponsors

University of Mississippi Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children older than 5yrs and weighing more than 20kg , who are scheduled for ambulatory dental rehabilitation at Batson operating rooms. * ASA classification 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy to midazolam, dexmedetomidine,morphine, fentanyl, sevoflurane and propofol. * uncorrected congenital heart disease or history of cardiac arrhythmia, * children at risk for airway obstruction (OSA or cranio facial syndrome), * pregnant minors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
University of Michigan Sedation ScaleDay 0:Just before the patient will be brought to the operating roomLevel of sedation at separation from parents and at the time of mask induction will be measured on a scale of 0 to 4 (University of Michigan Sedation Scale) University of Michigan Sedation Scale: 0 -Awake/Alert 1 -Minimally Sedated: Tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sounds. 2- Moderately Sedated: Somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation. 3 - Deeply Sedated: Deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation. 4 - Unarousable Moderately and Deeply sedated: Satisfactory Awake, minimally sedate, unarousable: Unsatisfactory

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptance of Mask InductionDay 0: At the time when anesthesia is inducedon a scale of 1 to 4 1. excellent( cooperative) 2. good( slight fear, easily calmed) 3. fair ( moderate fear, not calmed with reassurance) 4. Poor( agitated, terrified) 1 and 2 are considered satisfactory 3 and 4 are considered unsatisfactory
Wake up BehaviorDay 0: At the end of surgery when the patient recovers from anesthesiaassessed in post anesthesia recovery unit after the procedure on a scale of 1o 4 1. calm 2. not calm but easily calmed 3. moderately agitated or restless 4. combative/disoriented 1 and 2 are considered satisfactory 3 and 4 are considered unsatisfactory
Presence of Amnesia to Mask InductionDay 0: at the time of discharge of the patient from the recovery roomYes or No (if the patient remembers mask induction)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Midazolam
In M group, patients will be given oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg (5mg/ml parenteral preparation) mixed with flavored syrup as premedication Midazolam: oral midazolam 0.5mg/kg upto maximum dose of 15mg
37
Dexmedetomidine
In D group, patients will be given intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg prepared from 100mcg/ml parenteral preparation (Hospira R) . The drug will be administered using a intranasal mucosal administration device (LMA MAD NasalTM). Dexmedetomidine: intranasal dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg upto maximum dose of 100mcg
36
Total73

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDexmedetomidineMidazolamTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
36 Participants37 Participants73 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.37
7.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
7.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
36 Participants37 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants26 Participants50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

University of Michigan Sedation Scale

Level of sedation at separation from parents and at the time of mask induction will be measured on a scale of 0 to 4 (University of Michigan Sedation Scale) University of Michigan Sedation Scale: 0 -Awake/Alert 1 -Minimally Sedated: Tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sounds. 2- Moderately Sedated: Somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation. 3 - Deeply Sedated: Deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation. 4 - Unarousable Moderately and Deeply sedated: Satisfactory Awake, minimally sedate, unarousable: Unsatisfactory

Time frame: Day 0:Just before the patient will be brought to the operating room

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MidazolamUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleUnsatisfactory sedation on separation from parents22 Participants
MidazolamUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleSatisfactory sedation on transfer to OR table12 Participants
MidazolamUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleUnsatisfactory sedation on transfer to OR table25 Participants
MidazolamUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleSatisfactory sedation on separation from parents15 Participants
DexmedetomidineUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleUnsatisfactory sedation on transfer to OR table14 Participants
DexmedetomidineUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleSatisfactory sedation on transfer to OR table22 Participants
DexmedetomidineUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleSatisfactory sedation on separation from parents25 Participants
DexmedetomidineUniversity of Michigan Sedation ScaleUnsatisfactory sedation on separation from parents11 Participants
Comparison: A sample size of at least 33 patients in each group would detect at least 30% difference in proportion of children who achieve satisfactory sedation between the M and D groups at 0.05 level of significance and 80% powerp-value: 0.025Chi-squared
Secondary

Acceptance of Mask Induction

on a scale of 1 to 4 1. excellent( cooperative) 2. good( slight fear, easily calmed) 3. fair ( moderate fear, not calmed with reassurance) 4. Poor( agitated, terrified) 1 and 2 are considered satisfactory 3 and 4 are considered unsatisfactory

Time frame: Day 0: At the time when anesthesia is induced

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MidazolamAcceptance of Mask InductionSatisfactory mask induction35 Participants
MidazolamAcceptance of Mask Inductionunsatisfactory mask induction2 Participants
DexmedetomidineAcceptance of Mask InductionSatisfactory mask induction29 Participants
DexmedetomidineAcceptance of Mask Inductionunsatisfactory mask induction7 Participants
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared
Secondary

Presence of Amnesia to Mask Induction

Yes or No (if the patient remembers mask induction)

Time frame: Day 0: at the time of discharge of the patient from the recovery room

Population: 7 patients in the M group and 5 patients in D group had significant developmental delay and could not answer the question regarding memory of mask induction. Thus, only 61 were analyzed for this part

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MidazolamPresence of Amnesia to Mask Inductionmemory of mask induction-yes6 Participants
MidazolamPresence of Amnesia to Mask Inductionmemory of mask induction-no24 Participants
DexmedetomidinePresence of Amnesia to Mask Inductionmemory of mask induction-yes5 Participants
DexmedetomidinePresence of Amnesia to Mask Inductionmemory of mask induction-no26 Participants
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared
Secondary

Wake up Behavior

assessed in post anesthesia recovery unit after the procedure on a scale of 1o 4 1. calm 2. not calm but easily calmed 3. moderately agitated or restless 4. combative/disoriented 1 and 2 are considered satisfactory 3 and 4 are considered unsatisfactory

Time frame: Day 0: At the end of surgery when the patient recovers from anesthesia

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MidazolamWake up Behaviorsatisfactory wake up behavior37 Participants
MidazolamWake up Behaviorunsatisfactory wake up behavior0 Participants
DexmedetomidineWake up Behaviorsatisfactory wake up behavior35 Participants
DexmedetomidineWake up Behaviorunsatisfactory wake up behavior1 Participants
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026