Skip to content

A Randomised Pilot Study to Assess Differences in Stimulation Induced Paresthesia Between 2 Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems

A Randomised Pilot Study to Assess differenCes in tHe Subjects' Experience of stimulAtion-Induced paRaesthesiA Between Two Different Spinal Cord sTimulation dEvices: the Axium® DoRsal Root Ganglion Stimulation System Versus the Prime Advanced Dorsal Column Stimulation System

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02250469
Acronym
CHARACTER SCS
Enrollment
5
Registered
2014-09-26
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2022-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

12-SMI-2014 is a post-market, randomised, pilot study to identify and rate differences in patient experiences with two different types of Spinal Cord Stimulator devices which are routinely used to treat chronic pain.

Interventions

DEVICETreatment with the Axium SCS system
DEVICETreatment with the Medtronic SCS System

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is appropriate for SCS implantation according to standard criteria 2. Subject is \>18 to \<75 years old 3. Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol 4. Subject has chronic (\> 6 months) uni/bi-lateral neuropathic pain in the lower limb(s) (below the knee) with predominant foot pain 5. Minimum baseline pain rating of 50 mm on the VAS in the primary region of pain 6. Subject is able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has no other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specificity of Stimulation Induced Paresthesia3 Months post implantationA comparative analysis will be made between groups to determine the percentage of a patients painful and non-painful anatomy that is covered by stimulation induced paresthesia
Stability of Stimulation Induced Paresthesia3 Months post implantationA comparative analysis will be made between groups to determine any changes in the intensity of stimulation induced paresthesia in response to changes in body position
Patient Interactions with System3 Months post implantationA comparative analysis will be made between groups to determine the number of device interactions patients need to have on average, daily

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026