Skip to content

Effect of Meal Frequency on Glycemic Control of People at High Risk or Diagnosed With Diabetes

The Effects of Meal Frequency on Glucose, Insulin, and Insulin Sensitivity in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), People at High Risk for Developing Type 2 Diabetes and People With Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02248272
Enrollment
110
Registered
2014-09-25
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2017-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperglycemia, Hyperinsulinism, Impaired Glucose Tolerance, Insulin Sensitivity, Poor Glycemic Control

Keywords

Polycystic ovary syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes, Hyperinsulinemia, Meal frequency

Brief summary

This study investigated any potential associations between two isocaloric diets with different meal frequency (3 meals versus 6 meals) and glycemic control in people at high diabetes risk (lean and overweight/obese women with PCOS, individuals with hyperinsulinemia, individuals with impaired glucose tolerance) and diagnosed with diabetes.

Detailed description

The effect of meal frequency on diabetes risk markers (e.g. glucose and insulin metabolism) has been studied in several studies so far, both in healthy individuals and in individuals being at risk for diabetes mellitus, with or without concurrent weight loss. In addition, few studies have investigated the effect of different meal frequency on glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus under conditions of weight maintenance. However, the results regarding the ideal number of meals remain controversial. To our best knowledge, there is no study available that has investigated the effect of meal frequency on glucose and insulin metabolism in lean and obese women with PCOS, in lean and obese individuals with hyperinsulinemia and impaired glucose tolerance, and in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes, independently of weight loss.

Interventions

OTHERIsocaloric diet with 3 meals

Isocaloric diet with 3 meals in order to maintain volunteers' weight, tailored to individual energy needs, with the same macronutrient composition. The volunteers were free to choose the foods they used to consume before. However, in order to assist them to adapt to the different meal frequency, individualized instructions were given to all volunteers before their entry to the study. An example of a 7-day diet menu was prescribed for both diet programs and analytical food exchange lists of different food groups were also provided.

OTHERIsocaloric diet with 6 meals

Isocaloric diet with 6 meals in order to maintain volunteers' weight, tailored to individual energy needs, with the same macronutrient composition. The volunteers were free to choose the foods they used to consume before. However, in order to assist them to adapt to the different meal frequency, individualized instructions were given to all volunteers before their entry to the study. An example of a 7-day diet menu was prescribed for both diet programs and analytical food exchange lists of different food groups were also provided.

Sponsors

Agricultural University of Athens
CollaboratorOTHER
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
CollaboratorOTHER
Meropi Kontogianni
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The presence of type 2 diabetes was defined according to the current diagnostic criteria: (a) HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, (b) fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/l). (c) 2-h plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), using a glucose load containing the equivalent of 75 g anhydrous glucose dissolved in water, or (d) a random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l) in patients with classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis. * PCOS was defined according to the Rotterdam criteria (Rotterdam 2004) which include the presence of two or more of the following features: chronic oligoovulation or anovulation (fewer than six menstrual periods in the previous year), androgen excess (serum total testosterone \>70 mg/dl) and polycystic ovaries.

Exclusion criteria

* Insulin sensitizers, i.e. metformin, contraceptives, steroids or any medications known to affect glucose, insulin or reproductive hormones for at least the last 6 months. * Serious health problems like cardiovascular, liver or kidney diseases. * Volunteers who were on diet, using medications affecting body mass or who had experienced a change in body weight ≥ 4.5 kg or a change in physical activity within the 6 months preceding the study onset were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum levels of glucose6 monthsClinically useful change in serum glucose, defined as the restoration of glucose within normal limits during the 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HbA1c6 monthsClinically useful change in HbA1c.
Serum levels of insulin6 monthsClinically useful change in serum insulin, defined as the restoration of insulin within normal limits during the 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test. Improved insulin sensitivity.
Lipidemic profile6 monthsNormal serum levels of cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Triglycerides.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026