Skip to content

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Co-transplantation in Alternative Donor Transplantation of Severe Aplastic Anemia.

PhaseⅡTrial of Co-transplantation With Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Related Donors in Alternative Donor Transplantation of Severe Aplastic Anemia.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02247973
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-09-25
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2018-02-28
Last updated
2014-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Aplastic Anemia

Brief summary

The study is a phase II trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of co-transplantation with bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells from related donors in alternative donor transplantation of severe aplastic anemia.

Detailed description

Aplastic anemia (AA) is an autoimmune hematologic stem cell disease mediated by activated T-lymphocytes that leads to bone marrow dysfunction. In the presence of an empty marrow, pancytopenia, and transfusion dependence, the severity of the disease is based on neutrophil (PMN) count: nonsevere AA (nSAA; PMN \> 0.5 × 109/L), severe AA (SAA;PMN 0.2- 0.5 × 109/L), and very severe AA (vSAA; PMN\< 0.2 × 109/L). Allogeneic BMT from an HLA-identical sibling donor or matched-alternative donor is the treatment of choice for patients with aplastic anaemia.Transplantation for patients with severe aplastic anaemia from an HLA identical sibling donor is now very successful with a 75-90% chance of long term cure and with overall survival of between 65% and 73% at 5 years for matched-alternative donor transplantation. However, these two approachs are limited by the availability of HLA-matched donors. Patients without HLA-identical sibling donor or matched-alternative donor can be offered immunosuppressive treatment (IST) involving injections of Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in combination with cyclosporine (CsA). The treatment response with ATG is at best between 60-80%, 30%-40% patients relapse following an initial response to treatment. Moreover, a recent study has shown that on multivariate analysis of response at 6 months, only younger age, absolute reticulocyte count (ARC) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), correlate with response to ATG. Patients with SAA or vSAA, with much lower ARC and ALC, were poor response to IST and have high risks of dying of infection and bleeding. Nowadays, with advances in transplant technology, HLA-mismatched related donors and unrelated donors transplantation has achieved good clinical results. Data from the XJ Huang indicated that patients with HLA-mismatched related donors achieved 100% donor myeloid engraftment and have a survival rate of 64.6±12.4%. Retrospectively analyzed results for 154 patients with acquired SAA who received BMT from unrelated donors identified through the Japan Marrow Donor Program showed the probability of OS at 5 years was 56% (95% confidence interval, 34%-78%). Compared with malignant disease, mismatched related donor or unrelated donor HSCT for SAA involves distinct challenges mainly associated with high graft failure and high GVHD. So, if we can find a way to promote implantation meanwhile prevent or reduce GVHD , the efficacy of HLA-mismatched related donors transplantation can improve. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multi-potent non-hematopoietic progenitors mainly found in BM, cord blood, and adipose tissue. MSCs are attractive because of the ease with which they can be isolated and expanded ex vivo, their ability to undergo multilineage differentiation, and their lack of immunogenicity. These cells were shown to provide support for the growth and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells in BM micro-environments. In additon, preliminary studies have shown clinical effectiveness of allogeneic MSC in the treatment of refractory graft-versus-host disease and an improvement in or resolution of severe aGVHD when co-transplantation with MSCs. Due to these properties, MSCs have become an interesting candidate for use in cellular therapy and are considered theoretically perfect cells for potential clinical use against AA mismatched related donors transplantation.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALmesenchymal stem cells

Intravenous administration of up to 1\ 2x10\^6 MSCs per kg,for 2 times,d0 and d14

Sponsors

Guangzhou First People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Southern Medical University, China
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. In line with the 2009 Edition (United Kingdom) aplastic anemia diagnostic criteria for SAA or VSAA; 2. Age less than 50 years old,willing to transplant; 3. No HLA-identical sibling donor; 4. Have HLA-mismatched related donors or unrelated donors ( ≥5/10 HLA matched loci in related donors; ≥8/10 HLA matched loci in unrelated donors ) 5. No serious infection or acute hemorrhage; 6. Cardiac ultrasound examination showed left ventricular ejection fraction is greater than 50%; 7. Both transaminase and serum creatinine level are no more than twice times the upper limit of normal value (ULN); 8. No acute infectious disease; 9. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. 10. ECOG score of 0-2 points.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with severe infection or active bleeding; 2. With severe cardiac insufficiency, left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%; 3. With severe liver dysfunction, liver function (ALT and the TBIL) is higher than the ULN 3 times; 4. With severe renal insufficiency, renal function (Cr) is twice higher than the ULN; or 24-hour urine creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) lower than 50ml/min; 5. Active tuberculosis, severe acute hepatitis and other infectious diseases in active period; 6. ECOG score more than 3 points; 7. Accompanied by malignant tumors and other clonal disease; 8. Poor compliance and the researchers considered unsuitable for MSC infusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
survival rateup to 2 years after HSCTThe 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
acute GVHDUP to 3 months after HSCTThe incidence of acute GVHD after HSCT.
chronic GVHDUP to 2 years after HSCTThe incidence of chronic GVHD after HSCT.
Transplant-related mortalityUP to 1 months after HSCT
Rates of relapseUP to 2 years after HSCT
The implantationUp to 4 weeks after HSCTThe implantation rate and implantation time.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026