Laparoscopic Herniotomy
Conditions
Keywords
Neuromuscular Blockade, Laparoscopy
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate surgical work space and surgical conditions in patients scheduled for laparoscopic umbilical, -linea alba and incisional herniotomy. The patients will act as their own control with evaluation of surgical work space and surgical conditions during both deep NMB and no NMB.
Detailed description
Umbilical herniotomy is a frequent surgical procedure worldwide, and the larger hernia defects are preferably operated by laparoscopic technique. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach are shorter convalescence with earlier mobilization, and less wound complications \[1\]. A preferred approach is currently to close the defect by laparoscopic suturing in order to reduce the formation of seroma in the hernia sac \[2\] , and then apply a mesh by intraperitoneal onlay technique (IPOM technique). However, it may be difficult to suture the defect if there is tension in the abdominal wall muscles together with the applied pneumoperitoneum. There is evidence that muscle relaxation improves conditions for endotracheal intubation\[3\] and reduces laryngeal morbidity but only a few studies investigate the necessity of relaxation during laparoscopic surgery \[4\]. During laparoscopic surgery muscle relaxation is used with great variability. Sometimes the procedure is performed without muscle relaxation and sometimes with a so-called surgical neuromuscular blockade, which with objective neuromuscular monitoring means that train-of-four (TOF) is kept at 3-4 responses to nerve stimulation of the ulnar nerve. In this way there is a great variability in the neuromuscular blockade and rarely the patients are receiving deep neuromuscular blockade. Traditionally, neuromuscular monitoring is done by measuring the muscle strength of the adductor pollicis muscle on the thumb. The response to TOF nerve stimulation may be zero, while muscle relaxation of more resistant muscles such as the abdominal muscles and the diaphragm \[5;6\] are not complete which means that the patients may cough and their abdominal wall may feel tight during surgery, even though no response at the thumb is recorded. It is possible to quantify a deep neuromuscular block by the use of post-tetanic-count (PTC). With establishment of deep, continuous neuromuscular blockade with PTC value 0-1 all muscles including abdominal muscles and diaphragm are paralyzed \[7\]. It is therefore possible, that a deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) where the diaphragm and the abdominal wall muscles are more paralyzed will optimize the surgical work space, ease the surgical procedure, reduce operative time for the suturing part of the procedure as well as the total procedure time, and reduce the number of recurrences by long term follow-up. The purpose of this study is to investigate surgical work space and surgical conditions in patients scheduled for laparoscopic umbilical, -linea alba and incisional herniotomy. The patients will act as their own control with evaluation of surgical work space and surgical conditions during both deep NMB and no NMB. Hypothesis: Deep NMB defined as TOF=0 and post-tetanic count PTC ≥1, will give better surgical workspace, better surgical conditions, as well as shorter duration of surgery and reduced number of recurrences of hernias compared with no NMB.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients \> 18 years old * Elective laparoscopic umbilical herniotomy, incisional herniotomy and linea alba - herniotomy * Can read and understand Danish * Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Known allergy to sugammadex, rocuronium or mivacurium * Known homozygous variants in the butyrylcholinesterase gene * Severe renal disease, defined by S-creatinine\> 0.200 mmol/L, GFR \< 30ml/min or hemodialysis) * Neuromuscular disease that may interfere with neuromuscular data * Lactating or pregnant (Women of child bearing potential must take a urine pregnancy test at the day of the operation. The test will be provided by the hospital staff). * Indication for rapid sequence induction
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement of Surgical Workspace | 3 hours | Improvement of surgical workspace (rated on a 5-point scale) estimated as the difference between the workspace during deep NMB and the workspace without NMB. Ratings are performed in the same patient during stable pneumoperitoneum at 12 mmHg. (1 Extremely poor conditions; 2 Poor conditions; 3 Acceptable conditions; 4 Good conditions; 5 Optimal conditions) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Time | 3 hours | Duration of operating time (from first incision to last suture) |
| Suturing Time | 3 hours | Duration of suturing the hernia (minutes) |
| Contractions | 3 hours | Sudden contractions of the abdominal wall during operation (bucking or coughing), number of participants with sudden contractions |
| Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 3 hours | Surgeon´s rating of surgical conditions while suturing the hernia (5-point rating scale) (1 Extremely poor conditions; 2 Poor conditions; 3 Acceptable conditions; 4 Good conditions; 5 Optimal conditions) |
| Continuous Abdominal Contractions | 3 hours | Number of patients experiencing episodes with continuous abdominal contractions where the abdomen feels tight but the operation can still proceed (the intestines are gradually displaced near the inner surface of the abdominal wall) |
| Recurrences of Hernias | 2 years | Number of recurrences of hernias by 2 year follow-up (separate publication). |
| Insufflator Alarms | 3 hours | Insufflator alarms where pneumoperitoneum \> 17 mmHg Number of patients experiencing insufflator alarms where pneumoperitoneum \> 17 mmHg |
Countries
Denmark
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment Intervention after intubation and placement of trocars without NMB. Bolus of saline (placebo) 6mL (TOF 100%) the surgeon assesses the surgical workspace with pneumoperitoneum 12 mmHg. After administration of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg when TOF=0 the surgical workspace is assessed again
Rocuronium and Sugammadex | 19 |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment Intervention after intubation and placement of trocars without NMB. Bolus of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg when TOF=0 the surgeon assesses the surgical workspace with pneumoperitoneum 12 mmHg. Three minutes after administration of sugammadex (TOF 100%) the surgical workspace is assessed again
Rocuronium and Sugammadex | 15 |
| Total | 34 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Procedure changed to open surgery | 0 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 57 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 17 | 55 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 | 56.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 |
| ASA 1/2/3 ASA 1 | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| ASA 1/2/3 ASA 2 | 12 Participants | 10 Participants | 22 Participants |
| ASA 1/2/3 ASA 3 | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| BMI | 28 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 | 30 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 | 29 kg/m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17 |
| Herniea size (cm) | 2.4 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 | 3.1 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 | 2.72 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82 |
| Previous abdominal surgery | 12 Participants | 10 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants | 10 Participants | 25 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 19 | 0 / 15 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 19 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 19 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
Improvement of Surgical Workspace
Improvement of surgical workspace (rated on a 5-point scale) estimated as the difference between the workspace during deep NMB and the workspace without NMB. Ratings are performed in the same patient during stable pneumoperitoneum at 12 mmHg. (1 Extremely poor conditions; 2 Poor conditions; 3 Acceptable conditions; 4 Good conditions; 5 Optimal conditions)
Time frame: 3 hours
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 4 to 4 | 1 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 3 to 5 | 1 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 5 to 5 | 14 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 4 to 5 | 2 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 3 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 5 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 4 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 5 to 4 | 0 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 3 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 5 to 4 | 4 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 5 to 3 | 1 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 4 to 4 | 2 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 3 to 4 | 1 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 5 to 5 | 4 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 4 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 4 to 5 | 2 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 3 to 3 | 0 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Improvement of Surgical Workspace | Changes in ratings 3 to 5 | 1 Participants |
Continuous Abdominal Contractions
Number of patients experiencing episodes with continuous abdominal contractions where the abdomen feels tight but the operation can still proceed (the intestines are gradually displaced near the inner surface of the abdominal wall)
Time frame: 3 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Continuous Abdominal Contractions | 0 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Continuous Abdominal Contractions | 0 Participants |
Contractions
Sudden contractions of the abdominal wall during operation (bucking or coughing), number of participants with sudden contractions
Time frame: 3 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Contractions | 1 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Contractions | 0 Participants |
Insufflator Alarms
Insufflator alarms where pneumoperitoneum \> 17 mmHg Number of patients experiencing insufflator alarms where pneumoperitoneum \> 17 mmHg
Time frame: 3 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Insufflator Alarms | 0 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Insufflator Alarms | 0 Participants |
Operating Time
Duration of operating time (from first incision to last suture)
Time frame: 3 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Operating Time | 61 minutes |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Operating Time | 64 minutes |
Recurrences of Hernias
Number of recurrences of hernias by 2 year follow-up (separate publication).
Time frame: 2 years
Surgical Conditions While Suturing
Surgeon´s rating of surgical conditions while suturing the hernia (5-point rating scale) (1 Extremely poor conditions; 2 Poor conditions; 3 Acceptable conditions; 4 Good conditions; 5 Optimal conditions)
Time frame: 3 hours
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 3. Acceptable conditions | 0 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 5. Optimal conditions | 16 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 2. Poor conditions | 0 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 4. Good conditions | 3 Participants |
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 1. Extremely poor conditions | 0 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 5. Optimal conditions | 7 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 2. Poor conditions | 0 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 3. Acceptable conditions | 2 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 4. Good conditions | 4 Participants |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Surgical Conditions While Suturing | 1. Extremely poor conditions | 0 Participants |
Suturing Time
Duration of suturing the hernia (minutes)
Time frame: 3 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Saline, Assesment, Rocuronium and Assesment | Suturing Time | 10 minutes |
| Group B - Rocuronium, Assesment, Sugammadex and Assesment | Suturing Time | 9 minutes |