Skip to content

Re-Evaluation of Tumor Samples From Women With Breast Cancer With the in Vitro Diagnostic Kit MammaTyperTM

Evaluation of the MammaTyperTM Kit, Ref 90020/90021 Performed on Clinical Material Obtained From Patients With Breast Cancer: Re-Examination of Tumor Material and Re-Evaluation of Patient Data of the FinHer-Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02244580
Enrollment
1010
Registered
2014-09-19
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2016-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Invasive Breast Cancer

Keywords

Subtyping of Invasive breast cancer

Brief summary

This is a prospective examination of tumor material of breast cancer patients randomized into the FinHer-trial (= (= Comparison of vinorelbine and docetaxel and trastuzumab as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer patients wirh a high risk of cancer recurrence). The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples will be analysed for Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), progesterone receptor (PgR), Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Antigen Ki-67 (Ki-67) with the molecular in vitro diagnostic kit MammaTyper™. According to the new subtyping the 5 year Distant disease free survival (DDFS) and Overall survival (OS) will be re-evaluated.

Detailed description

Despite the fact that reliable measures for the markers ESR1, PgR, HER2, Ki-67 are necessary with the currently used methods up to 20% of determinations are inaccurate and especially Ki67- measures are not very reproducible. Therefore new evaluation systems or new methods are necessary to improve diagnostic. At least 4 subtypes can be distinguished to date depending on the expression of ESR, PgR, Her2 and Ki-67: * Luminal A-type * Luminal B-type * Her2-type * Triple-negative-type MammaTyper™ uses a new approach. Instead of detection of the marker proteins, the messenger ribonucleic adic (mRNA) of marker proteins is quantitated. This prospectively planned diagnostic study will investigate the potential of subgrouping of patients at baseline according to results of MammaTyper™ methodology for predicting survival. Patients will be subgrouped according to the new marker determination and the DDFS and OS will be evaluated and compared to the DDFS and OS of subgrouping with former marker determination.

Interventions

MammaTyper™ kit is a molecular in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative detection of the ribonuclease acid (RNA) expression status of the genes for estrogen receptor (ESR1), progesterone receptor (PGR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and proliferation antigen KI 67.

Sponsors

BioNTech Diagnostics GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Invasive breast cancer verified in a histological biopsy * Age 65 or younger * Estrogen receptor (ER), PgR and HER2 expression have been determined * No distant metastases present (M0) * The patient provides a written informed consent for study participation * The estimated risk of breast cancer recurrence is high (25% or higher within the first 5 years from the date of the diagnosis, over \>35% within the first 10 years from the diagnosis)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with breast cancer with a special histological type (mucinous, papillary, medullary, or tubular type of breast cancer) when no metastases are present in the ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes * The WHO performance status is moderate/poor, Z \>1 * The peripheral blood leukocyte count is less than 3.0 x 109/L, the blood granulocyte count is less than 1.5 x 109/L, or the blood thrombocyte count is less than 120 x 109/L * Any physical or mental disorder that is considered to prohibit administration of chemotherapy * Cardiac failure; severe cardiac arrythmia requiring regular medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5 Year Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS) Assessed as Rate of Patients Without Distant Metastases in Subgroup Luminal A vs. Combined Subgroup (Luminal B, HER2 Positive, Triple Negative), Based on Subtyping With MammaTyper™5 year from the date of patient randomisationTumor material of breast cancer patients will be newly assessed by MammaTyper™ and 5 year DDFS will be calculated new according to new subgrouping (Luminal A vs. combined subgroup (Luminal B, HER2 positive, triple negative))

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With High Ki-67 and Prognosis on Outcome for DDFS and OS (Measured by Hazard Ratio)5 yearsHigh Ki-67 is prognostic for worse outcome for DDFS and OS (measured by hazard ratio)
Number of Patients With Ki-67 Determined by MammaTyper™ Compared to Local Ki-67 Eyeballed Assessment for Luminal Tumors and Correlation to Rate of Patients With Regard to OS and DDFS5 yearsSuperiority of outcome prediction for MammaTyper™ Ki-67 over local Ki-67 eyeballed assessment for Luminal tumors with regard to OS and DDFS

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The clinical data and breast tumour tissue samples were collected within the FinHer trial (identifier ISRCTN76560285), where 1010 women with axillary node-positive or high-risk axillary node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned between October 2000 and September 2003.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FinHer Patients
Of all patients, FFPE tumour block was processed with the RNXtract RNA extraction kit (BioNTech Diagnostics GmbH, Mainz) using a magnetic particle-based assay (Supplemental file 1A). RT-qPCR was done with the MammaTyper kit (BioNTech Diagnostics GmbH, Mainz) for ESR1, PGR, ERBB2 and MKI67.
1,010
Total1,010

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyNo cancer tissues available241

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFinHer Patients
Age, Continuous50.9 years
Region of Enrollment
Finland
1010 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1010 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

5 Year Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS) Assessed as Rate of Patients Without Distant Metastases in Subgroup Luminal A vs. Combined Subgroup (Luminal B, HER2 Positive, Triple Negative), Based on Subtyping With MammaTyper™

Tumor material of breast cancer patients will be newly assessed by MammaTyper™ and 5 year DDFS will be calculated new according to new subgrouping (Luminal A vs. combined subgroup (Luminal B, HER2 positive, triple negative))

Time frame: 5 year from the date of patient randomisation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luminal A5 Year Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS) Assessed as Rate of Patients Without Distant Metastases in Subgroup Luminal A vs. Combined Subgroup (Luminal B, HER2 Positive, Triple Negative), Based on Subtyping With MammaTyper™92 percentage of analyzed participants
Combined Subtype5 Year Distant Disease Free Survival (DDFS) Assessed as Rate of Patients Without Distant Metastases in Subgroup Luminal A vs. Combined Subgroup (Luminal B, HER2 Positive, Triple Negative), Based on Subtyping With MammaTyper™82 percentage of analyzed participants
p-value: 0.001895% CI: [0.246, 0.726]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Number of Patients With High Ki-67 and Prognosis on Outcome for DDFS and OS (Measured by Hazard Ratio)

High Ki-67 is prognostic for worse outcome for DDFS and OS (measured by hazard ratio)

Time frame: 5 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Luminal ANumber of Patients With High Ki-67 and Prognosis on Outcome for DDFS and OS (Measured by Hazard Ratio)0.42 Hazard ratio
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.25, 0.71]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Number of Patients With Ki-67 Determined by MammaTyper™ Compared to Local Ki-67 Eyeballed Assessment for Luminal Tumors and Correlation to Rate of Patients With Regard to OS and DDFS

Superiority of outcome prediction for MammaTyper™ Ki-67 over local Ki-67 eyeballed assessment for Luminal tumors with regard to OS and DDFS

Time frame: 5 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Luminal ANumber of Patients With Ki-67 Determined by MammaTyper™ Compared to Local Ki-67 Eyeballed Assessment for Luminal Tumors and Correlation to Rate of Patients With Regard to OS and DDFSDDFS (MKI67 mRNA positive - negative)0.42 Hazard ratio
Luminal ANumber of Patients With Ki-67 Determined by MammaTyper™ Compared to Local Ki-67 Eyeballed Assessment for Luminal Tumors and Correlation to Rate of Patients With Regard to OS and DDFSDDFS (Ki-67 protein positive - negative)0.56 Hazard ratio
Combined SubtypeNumber of Patients With Ki-67 Determined by MammaTyper™ Compared to Local Ki-67 Eyeballed Assessment for Luminal Tumors and Correlation to Rate of Patients With Regard to OS and DDFSDDFS (MKI67 mRNA positive - negative)0.45 Hazard ratio
Combined SubtypeNumber of Patients With Ki-67 Determined by MammaTyper™ Compared to Local Ki-67 Eyeballed Assessment for Luminal Tumors and Correlation to Rate of Patients With Regard to OS and DDFSDDFS (Ki-67 protein positive - negative)0.43 Hazard ratio

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026