Skip to content

Use of a Microbial Sealant to Reduce Surgical Site Infections.

Microbial Sealants Do Not Decrease Surgical Site Infection for Clean Contaminated Colorectal Procedures.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02241915
Acronym
Integuseal
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-09-16
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

SCIP, Surgical Site Infection

Brief summary

Surgical site infections (SSI) are costly complications that may cause significant morbidity and increase the cost of care, particularly in colorectal surgery. Microbial sealants (MS) are a new class of wound barriers aimed at decreasing SSI, however there is only evidence of benefit in clean Class 1 procedures. Based on its success in Class 1 procedures, we hypothesized that a microbial sealant could reduce the rate of SSI by half for clean contaminated colorectal procedures (Class 2).

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen Colorectal Surgery
PROCEDURELaparoscopic Surgery

Sponsors

University of Southern California
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Nonemergent colon and/or rectal abdominal surgical procedures 2. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum HCG assay prior to surgery 3. Ages ≥18 years.

Exclusion criteria

1. Known history of hypersensitivity to cyanoacrylate, formaldehyde or acetone products. 2. Undergoing emergency surgery (urgent surgery is allowed if informed consent is obtained and the study procedures can be performed). Emergency surgery includes cases where standard bowel preparation and other preoperative assessments cannot be done. 3. Undergoing a significant concomitant surgical procedure (e.g., Whipple & organ transplant surgery). The following concomitant procedures are allowed: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, oophorectomy, liver biopsy/wedge resection (but not liver resection), cystectomy. 4. History of prior laparotomy within the last 60 days of this planned procedure. 5. Planned to undergo a second laparotomy or colorectal surgical procedure (e.g. colostomy or ileostomy takedown) within 60 days of this planned first procedure. 6. Evidence preoperatively of any of the following: sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock (note that SIRS alone is not an

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of SSI with and without microbial sealant.15 MonthsDetermine the rate of SSI when microbial sealant (InteguSEAL© Kimberly-Clark) is used compared to control (no microbial sealant).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subgroup incidence of SSI with and without microbial sealant15 monthsCompare SSI for open vs. laparoscopy colectomy, age, BMI, diabetes and morbidity (ASA class), hospital readmission, reoperation and wound dehiscence with and without microbial sealant.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026