Breast Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
sentinel node biopsy, lymph node metastasis, survival
Brief summary
Since the introduction of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer, it has become clear that its use is reliable and reproducible. Today, it is clinical routine to not remove further lymph nodes from the axilla (arm pit) in case the sentinel node (which is the first lymph node/s reached by lymphatic flow from the breast) is free of tumor deposits. It is also routine to leave remaining lymph nodes behind in case the sentinel node contains a minimal cluster of tumor cells, called isolated tumor cells (formerly submicrometastasis). Even in slightly larger tumor deposits, so called micrometastasis (up to 2 mm in size), it has been shown that a completion axillary clearance (removal of further lymph nodes from the arm pit) does not contribute to a better survival. Data from a randomized study indicate that it seems safe to omit axillary clearance even if the sentinel node biopsy shows up to 2 nodes with tumor deposits over 2 mm in size (macrometastasis). These studies have changed clinical practice in many countries, however, it is still debated whether it is safe to omit axillary clearance in the case of sentinel node macrometastasis due to under-recruitment in the aforementioned study. The rationale for omitting extensive axillary surgery is the avoidance of postoperative morbidity such as arm lymphedema, loss of sensation, pain and swelling. The hypothesis is that refraining from axillary clearance in breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel nodes with macrometastasis will not worsen 5-year overall survival (primary endpoint) by more than a maximum of 2.5%. This study is a prospective international randomized trial planning for enrolment of 3500 patients. Breast cancer patients without signs of axillary nodal involvement will be eligible for sentinel node biopsy. Those who are found to have up to two sentinel node containing macrometastasis will be informed about this trial Those wishing to participate will be randomized to either undergo further axillary surgery (clearance) or not. Secondary endpoints are oncological outcomes at 1-5, 10 and 15 years (local, regional and distant recurrence, recurrence-free and breast cancer-specific survival and contralateral breast cancer), patient-reported arm morbidity at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, patient-reported quality of life at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, and health economic outcomes at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years.
Detailed description
Details can be found on www.senomac.se
Interventions
The intervention is the omission of completion axillary clearance after the detection of sentinel node macrometastasis
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with invasive breast cancer (T1-T3) * N0 on palpation * Preoperative ultrasound performed * Macrometastasis in 1-2 sentinel lymph nodes * The patient must have provided oral and written consent * Age ≥ 18 years
Exclusion criteria
* Metastases outside of the ipsilateral axilla * Prior history of invasive breast cancer * Pregnancy * Bilateral breast cancer if one side meets
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| overall survival | up to 15 years | death of any cause in both arms measured at a median follow-up of 5 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| recurrence-free survival | 5, 10 and 15 years | Any invasive breast cancer recurrence and death of any cause are regarded as events |
| breast cancer-specific survival | 5, 10 and 15 years | Death attributed to breast cancer is regarded as the event |
| patient-reported outcomes | early postoperative, 1, 3, 5, and 10 years | Patients report on any arm-related problems and functional outcomes at an early postoperative assessment and after 1, 3, 5 and 10 years. Questionnaires include EORTC QLQ-BR23 and C30 and Lymph-ICF. |
| health economy | 1, 3, 5 and 10 years | The use of health care resources is assessed by QUALYs by means of the EQ5D questionnaire |
| additional oncological outcomes | yearly 1-5 years, 10 and 15 years | local, regional and distant recurrences will be reported as events and reported within recurrence-free survival and as distinct events |
Countries
Denmark, Greece, Sweden
Contacts
Aarhus University Hospital
Rigshospitalet Copenhagen, Dnmark
University of Athens
University of Aarhus
Klinikum Esslingen
Universität Rostock
San Raffaele Hospital, Milano
Universitätsklinikum Salzburg
Karolinska Institutet
Karolinska University Hospital
Central Hospital Västerås
Central Hospital Västerås
Lund University
University Hospital, Umeå
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Region Örebro County
Sahlgrenska University Hospital