Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness Between Microprocessor Knees and Non-Microprocessor Knees

Comparative Effectiveness Between Microprocessor Knees and Non-Microprocessor Knees

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02240186
Acronym
MPK-AOPA
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-09-15
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2018-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)

Keywords

Microprocessor-controlled knee, prosthesis, amputation

Brief summary

This study will assess if the functional performance and musculoskeletal outcome of transfemoral amputees are improved after receiving a Microprocessor Knee (MPK) compared to a Non-Microprocessor Knees (NMPK).

Detailed description

The study design is a reversal design whereby only the prosthetic knee joint will be changed. Each subject will be tested using their current NMPK, fit and tested with a MPK, and then tested again with their NMPK. MPK prostheses from all manufacturers will be considered appropriate for testing. Each MPK to be used in this study is FDA approved. The foot will be in the L5981 class, e.g. flex foot or equivalent. The same socket, suspension, and foot will be used throughout the study in order to eliminate these confounding variables. All prosthesis fittings will be performed by the subject's own certified prosthetist according to manufacturers' fitting guidelines.

Interventions

DEVICEMicroprocessor Knee (MPK)

MPKs are prosthetic knees that use a microprocessor to control the prosthetic knee mechanism and adjust knee stiffness.

DEVICENon-Microprocessor Knee (NMPK)

A NMPK is a mechanical knee with either hydraulic or pneumatic controls.

Sponsors

American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral transfemoral amputee * Medicare Functional Classification Level K2 or K3 * Currently using NMPK prosthesis * No current residual limb problems, such as skin breakdown * Able to ambulate without a gait aid

Exclusion criteria

* Previous stroke or other neuromuscular complications currently affecting gait * Currently undergoing dialysis treatments * Amputation of the contralateral limb * Poor fit of current NMPK prosthesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily Activity Measured With Triaxial AccelerometersBaseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)Measurements will be obtained three times using activity monitors attached to waist, and bilaterally to the ankle and thigh for a period of 4 consecutive days, including 2 weekdays and 2 weekend days. Primary outcome will be the difference in activity level between the NMPK and MPK measurements.
Falls as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Addendum (PEQ-A)Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) addendum (PEQ-A) is a self-administered questionnaire to quantify balance confidence, concentration, stumbles, and falls. The outcome will be difference in falls per month between the Non-Microprocessor Knee (NPMK) and MPK measurements. The number of falls was recorded as the sum of items #5 and #7 in the PEQ-A.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)The condition-specific Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was used to quantify patient satisfaction with each prosthesis. The outcome was a difference in PEQ scores between the NPMK and MPK measurements. The PEQ is a self-administered questionnaire composed of nine validated scales (ambulation, appearance, frustration, perceived response, residual limb health, social burden, sounds, utility, well being). Scores range from 0 to 100 for each sub-scale. Higher scores indicated a higher functioning prosthesis/quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prosthetic Knee Joints
Each subject will be tested using their current Non-Microprocessor Knee (NMPK) , fit and tested with a Microprocessor Knee (MPK), and then tested again with their NMPK, e.g. A-B-A design. Microprocessor Knee (MPK): MPKs are prosthetic knees that use a microprocessor to control the prosthetic knee mechanism and adjust knee stiffness. Non-Microprocessor Knee (NMPK): A NMPK is a mechanical knee with either hydraulic or pneumatic controls.
50
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProsthetic Knee Joints
Age, Continuous69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Daily Activity Measured With Triaxial Accelerometers

Measurements will be obtained three times using activity monitors attached to waist, and bilaterally to the ankle and thigh for a period of 4 consecutive days, including 2 weekdays and 2 weekend days. Primary outcome will be the difference in activity level between the NMPK and MPK measurements.

Time frame: Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)

Population: Activity measurement data were available for analysis on 46 baseline participants, 31 MPK participants, and 18 NMPK participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prosthetic Knee JointsDaily Activity Measured With Triaxial AccelerometersBaseline15.64 % of DayStandard Deviation 8362
Prosthetic Knee JointsDaily Activity Measured With Triaxial AccelerometersMPK19.68 % of DayStandard Deviation 11.88
Prosthetic Knee JointsDaily Activity Measured With Triaxial AccelerometersNMPK18.23 % of DayStandard Deviation 10.54
p-value: 0.01ANOVA
Primary

Falls as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Addendum (PEQ-A)

The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) addendum (PEQ-A) is a self-administered questionnaire to quantify balance confidence, concentration, stumbles, and falls. The outcome will be difference in falls per month between the Non-Microprocessor Knee (NPMK) and MPK measurements. The number of falls was recorded as the sum of items #5 and #7 in the PEQ-A.

Time frame: Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)

Population: Data for falls were available for analysis on 46 baseline participants, 30 MPK participants, and 17 NMPK participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Prosthetic Knee JointsFalls as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Addendum (PEQ-A)Baseline2.0 Falls per month
Prosthetic Knee JointsFalls as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Addendum (PEQ-A)MPK0.0 Falls per month
Prosthetic Knee JointsFalls as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire Addendum (PEQ-A)NMPK3.0 Falls per month
p-value: 0.01ANOVA
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)

The condition-specific Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) was used to quantify patient satisfaction with each prosthesis. The outcome was a difference in PEQ scores between the NPMK and MPK measurements. The PEQ is a self-administered questionnaire composed of nine validated scales (ambulation, appearance, frustration, perceived response, residual limb health, social burden, sounds, utility, well being). Scores range from 0 to 100 for each sub-scale. Higher scores indicated a higher functioning prosthesis/quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (tested on subjects' current NMPK), 10 weeks (after 10 weeks acclimation time to the study MPK) , 4 weeks (subjects placed back on NMPK and tested after 4 weeks re-acclimation time)

Population: Not all participants completed all the scales in the questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Perceived Response85.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.29
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Well Being53.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.81
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Social Burden62.21 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.75
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Residual Limb Health74.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.95
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Ambulation39.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.14
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Utility53.96 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.48
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Frustration51.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.44
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Appearance64.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.81
Prosthetic Knee JointsPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Sounds76.96 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.28
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Residual Limb Health77.08 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.58
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Ambulation49.58 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.61
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Appearance74.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Frustration66.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.67
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Perceived Response89.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.88
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Social Burden71.71 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Sounds81.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.22
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Utility64.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.07
Prosthetic Knee Joint - MPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Well Being62.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.18
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Frustration56.29 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.83
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Ambulation45.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.94
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Sounds85.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.91
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Appearance62.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.37
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Well Being61.10 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.28
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Residual Limb Health76.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.56
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Perceived Response90.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.91
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Utility52.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.18
Prosthetic Knee Joint - NMPKPatient Satisfaction as Assessed by the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)Social Burden66.06 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.15
p-value: 0.01ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026