Skip to content

Arthritis Pilot for Preserving Muscle While Losing Weight

Weighted Vest Use to Preserve Muscle and Bone During Obesity Treatment for Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02239939
Acronym
APPLE
Enrollment
37
Registered
2014-09-15
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2018-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Osteoarthritis

Keywords

older adults, body composition, weight loss, muscle mass

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to see whether wearing a weighted vest during a period of active weight loss can decrease the loss of muscle and bone that occurs during weight loss. We will also determine if study participants who wear the weighted vest will have greater improvements in physical function and self-reported disability, pain, stiffness, fatigue and quality of life. This knowledge could impact weight loss programs designed for older adults. Hypothesis: Participants randomized to VEST will experience similar weight loss, but less loss of lean mass and bone density, than participants randomized to Control.

Detailed description

The loss of muscle mass and bone density during weight loss is partially attributed to the decrease in mechanical stress on these tissues as weight is reduced. As a result, performing exercises that enhance muscle and gravitational loading during the period of caloric restriction usually diminishes the relative amount of muscle and bone loss for a given weight loss, but these interventions do not fully prevent all muscle and bone loss.In addition, conventional exercise training interventions often require expensive equipment, on-site participation, and, ideally for older, obese adults, safety supervision by trained exercise leaders. Moreover, the exercises performed may not fully translate into improvement in daily tasks due to training specificity, and are not always tolerated or sustained, especially in obese persons with OA. On the other hand, it is conceivable that treating the decrease in mechanical load from weight loss by externally replacing lost weight via use of a weighted vest may also be effective for reducing muscle and bone loss during caloric restriction. In animal models, mechanisms regulating skeletal tissue structure and function respond in a similar fashion to increases in actual or externally-added body mass. Also, research shows that exercising while wearing weighted vests can improve bone density, muscle mass, and lower extremity strength in older adults. However, no prior studies have examined the effects of weighted vest use on muscle mass and bone density during a period of intentional weight loss. The main objective of this pilot study is to assess feasibility (accrual, retention, compliance) of daily use of a weighted vest during a diet intervention, to estimate the variability of outcome measures, and to obtain preliminary estimates of treatment efficacy. A controlled, randomized design will be used so we can obtain a realistic estimate of accrual and an unbiased estimate of treatment efficacy. A total of 36 older (age=65-79 yrs), obese (BMI=30-40 kg/m2), sedentary men and women with x-ray evidence of knee OA will undergo a 22 week weight loss intervention (targeting 10% weight loss) with randomization to one of two groups (n=18/grp): 1) No vest use (Control); or 2) Progressive weighted vest use during normal daily activities (VEST).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVest

light weight, adjustable, vest to be worn underneath clothes that weight can be added to

BEHAVIORALDiet

Participants will undergo a 22 week dietary weight loss intervention which will incorporate dietary practices for achieving weight loss while minimizing muscle and bone loss. Participants will be instructed by the Registered Dietitian to follow a low calorie diet. Individual calorie goals will be adjusted during the study if necessary to achieve a targeted weight loss goal of at least 8%, but no more than 12%, within the intervention time frame.

Sponsors

Medifast, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* BMI=30-40 kg/m2; Wt\<135 kg, * self- reported MD diagnosis of osteoarthritis * No evidence of clinical depression or other contraindications for participation in voluntary weight loss, * Sedentary lifestyle (\<30 min, 3 d/wk of exercise), * Able to provide own transportation to study visits and intervention, * Not dependent on a cane or walker, * Willing and able to consume meal replacement products, * Not involved in other research study, * Approved for participation by Medical Director, * Willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Weight loss or gain (±5%) in past 6 mos, * Excessive alcohol use (\> 14 drinks/wk), * Smoker (\>1 cigarette/d or 4/wk within yr), * Evidence of cognitive impairment (MoCA score \<22) or difficulty with hearing or vision that would interfere with study participation, Insulin-dependent or uncontrolled diabetes (FBG \>125 mg/dl) or Hypertriglyceridemia (TG\>400 mg/dl), * Osteoporosis (T-score\< -2.5 on hip or spine); Hip fracture, joint replacement, or spinal surgery in past 6 mos, or hyperkyphosis, * Uncontrolled hypertension (BP\>160/90 mmHg) or abnormal kidney or liver tests per Medical Director discretion, * Self- reported hepatitis B or C, * Severe anemia (Hb\<10 g/100 ml), * Past or current uncontrolled endocrine/metabolic disease, neurological or hematological disease, fibromyalgia, chronic pulmonary disease, hyperparathyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, unstable angina, MI, cardiac surgery within 3 months, * Cancer requiring treatment in past year except non-melanoma skin cancers, * Regular use of medications that may influence body weight, hormones, weight loss medications, bone remodeling medication, prior use of medications that affect bone, insulin-dependent, * Unable to tolerate vest run-in.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Lean Mass Measured by DXABaseline and 22 weeksLean body mass (Whole body and lower-extremity lean mass are used in total calculation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Hip Bone DensityBasleine and 22 weeksHip bone density as measured by DXA.
Changes in Self-report on Fatigue Using Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS)baseline and 22 weeksPittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is a self-administered 10 item assessment. It asks participants to rate the level of physical and mental fatigue they experience or imagine after completing a set of hypothetical activities related to daily life at a fixed intensity and duration. The participant provides a score from 0-5 where 0' equals no fatigue at all, and 5 equals extreme fatigue.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body WeightBaseline and 22 weeksBody weight
Changes in Lower Extremity Physical FunctionBaseline and 22 weeksSPPB is a measure of lower-extremity function consisting of walking speed, balance, and repeated chair stands. These 3 performance measures are scored from 0 to 4, with 4 indicating the highest level of performance and 0 the inability to complete the task, with a summary score of 0-12.The SPPB has been shown to have predictive validity showing a gradient of risk for mortality, nursing home admission, and disability.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vest + Diet
All participants will undergo a 22 week dietary weight loss. In addition, participants will be asked to wear a weighted vest for \>10 hours a day. Weight in the vest is adjusted to match weight lost during the intervention. Vest: light weight, adjustable, vest to be worn underneath clothes that weight can be added to Diet: Participants will undergo a 22 week dietary weight loss intervention which will incorporate dietary practices for achieving weight loss while minimizing muscle and bone loss. Participants will be instructed by the Registered Dietitian to follow a low calorie diet. Individual calorie goals will be adjusted during the study if necessary to achieve a targeted weight loss goal of at least 8%, but no more than 12%, within the intervention time frame.
20
No Vest + Diet
All participants will undergo a 22 week dietary weight loss intervention. Participants in this group will be asked not to change their daily habits other than adherence to the diet protocol. Diet: Participants will undergo a 22 week dietary weight loss intervention which will incorporate dietary practices for achieving weight loss while minimizing muscle and bone loss. Participants will be instructed by the Registered Dietitian to follow a low calorie diet. Individual calorie goals will be adjusted during the study if necessary to achieve a targeted weight loss goal of at least 8%, but no more than 12%, within the intervention time frame.
17
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVest + DietTotalNo Vest + Diet
Age, Continuous70.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
70.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
69.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants37 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants28 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants37 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants29 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 17
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 2010 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 202 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Lean Mass Measured by DXA

Lean body mass (Whole body and lower-extremity lean mass are used in total calculation).

Time frame: Baseline and 22 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diet+VestChange in Lean Mass Measured by DXA-2.9 KgStandard Deviation 1.6
No Vest+DietChange in Lean Mass Measured by DXA-2.3 KgStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Change in Hip Bone Density

Hip bone density as measured by DXA.

Time frame: Basleine and 22 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Diet+VestChange in Hip Bone Density-6.1 g/cm2
No Vest+DietChange in Hip Bone Density-18.7 g/cm2
Secondary

Changes in Self-report on Fatigue Using Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS)

Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is a self-administered 10 item assessment. It asks participants to rate the level of physical and mental fatigue they experience or imagine after completing a set of hypothetical activities related to daily life at a fixed intensity and duration. The participant provides a score from 0-5 where 0' equals no fatigue at all, and 5 equals extreme fatigue.

Time frame: baseline and 22 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diet+VestChanges in Self-report on Fatigue Using Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS)15.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
No Vest+DietChanges in Self-report on Fatigue Using Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS)12.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Other Pre-specified

Change in Body Weight

Body weight

Time frame: Baseline and 22 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diet+VestChange in Body Weight-110.6 kgStandard Deviation 5.7
No Vest+DietChange in Body Weight-10.9 kgStandard Deviation 4.1
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Lower Extremity Physical Function

SPPB is a measure of lower-extremity function consisting of walking speed, balance, and repeated chair stands. These 3 performance measures are scored from 0 to 4, with 4 indicating the highest level of performance and 0 the inability to complete the task, with a summary score of 0-12.The SPPB has been shown to have predictive validity showing a gradient of risk for mortality, nursing home admission, and disability.

Time frame: Baseline and 22 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diet+VestChanges in Lower Extremity Physical Function0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
No Vest+DietChanges in Lower Extremity Physical Function0.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026