Skip to content

Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy

Improving Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy (The KOSMOS Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02238652
Acronym
KOSMOS
Enrollment
560
Registered
2014-09-12
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2016-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of Life

Keywords

Nursing homes, Dementia, Quality of Life, Geriatrics, Aged, Activities of Daily Living, Pain, Pain management, Advance Care Planning, Patient Safety, Costs and Cost Analysis, Medication Errors, Medical Order Entry Systems, Medication Reconciliation, Medication Therapy Management, Depression, Psychotropic Drugs, Informed Consent, Presumed Consent, Anxiety, Apathy, Hospitalization, Mortality

Brief summary

Improving quality of life (QoL) in residents of nursing homes: A cluster randomized clinical trial of efficacy - The KOSMOS study. COSMOS (COmmunication (Advance Care Planning - ACP), Systematic pain assessment and treatment, Medication review, Occupational therapy, and Safety) is a practical intervention aimed to improve clinical and psychiatric challenges in NH patients. The COSMOS intervention combines the most effective research results to improve staff competence and patients' mental health, safety, QoL. We also aim to reduce psychotropic drug use and costs.

Detailed description

Background: Nursing home (NH) patients have complex mental health problems, disabilities and social needs, compounded by widespread prescription of psychotropic drugs. To preserve their dignity and quality of life is an important goal of our society. This can only be achieved within NHs that offer high competent conditions of treatment and care. Research questions and hypotheses: 1. Will the implementation of a communication and end-of-life decision making process have impact on interactions between patients, staff and family? We hypothesize that ACP will improve the interactions between patients, staff and family, and satisfaction in relatives and thereby improve the quality of life NH patients. 2. Is the KOSMOS capable to affect agitation and aggression and reduce medication e.g. psychotropics in NH patient? We hypothesize that KOSMOS will significantly reduce agitation and aggression, the total amount of medication, and psychotropic drug use. 3. What combination of interventions will give the broadest benefit, and could be delivered as a routine intervention as part of NH practice? We hypothesize that the comprehensive KOSMOS approach improves QoL and makes positive changes in NH practice. 4. What other types of advantages are expected? We hypothesize that KOSMOS is a cost-effective approach, with potential to increase the safety and reduce mortality in NH patients. Method: The KOSMOS intervention combines the most effective research results to improve staff competence, and patients' mental health, safety, QoL, and to reduce psychotropic drug use and costs. The efficacy testing of KOSMOS includes systematic literature review, a pilot study, a 9-month randomized control trial (RCT), and a dissemination plan. Data collection will take place at baseline, months 4, and 9. The intervention entails provision of staff training, study guidelines and manuals. NHs will be randomized to either KOSMOS or current best practice. We will include 38 NH long-term-care (LTC) wards (normally just one ward per NH) in Bergen, Stavanger, Oslo/Bærum, Sarpsborg and Sogn and Fjordane. In total 310 patients ≥65 years will be recruited from these wards Primary and secondary outcome measures: Quality of life in late stage dementia (QUALID), QUALIDEM, EQ-5-D; Neuropsychiatric Inventory - NH edition (NPI-NH); Activities of Daily Living (ADL); Cornell; Mobilization - Observation - Behaviour - Intensity - Dementia 2 (MOBID-2); drug use; drug-related problems, START; STOP; cost-utility analysis (RUD-FOCA); hospital admission; and mortality, ActiWatch; Log registration of NH activities; Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements Statistical analyses: include characteristics between 2 groups (Chi square, Mann-Whitney U), ANCOVA, ICC and p-values for each time-point and outcomes. National and international collaboration: National collaboration between researchers at the Universities of Bergen, Oslo, and Stavanger is established. Internationally, colleagues from the EU COST-Action TD1005, Karolinska University, Stockholm and Kings College, London are engaged in this RCT. Funding: The employment of two PhD-candidates (100%) and one post-doctoral fellow (50%) received funding by the Norwegian Research Council (Sponsor's Protocol Code: 222113) in 2012.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCommunication

A preparation process before the patient become incapable of participating in life prolonging decisions

BEHAVIORALSystematic Pain Assessment and Treatment

Assess pain with MOBID-2 Pain Scale and thereby improve pain management in dementia.

BEHAVIORALMedication Review

An individual and systematic review of medication prescriptions to identify possible harmful drug effects and to reduce the use of psychotropic drugs.

BEHAVIORALOccupational therapy

Increase individual activities, based on function, personal interest and personality by educating the staff on these elements.

BEHAVIORALSafety

Focusing on developing a culture where staff has an active and constant awareness of how to prevent adverse events and a commitment to safety.

Sponsors

The Research Council of Norway
CollaboratorOTHER
Rebekka Ege Hegemanns legat
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Helse Stavanger HF
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Oslo
CollaboratorOTHER
King's College London
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Bergen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Resident in long time care ward in Bergen, Bærum, Sarpsborg, Kvam, Fjell, Sund, Askøy and Øygarden

Exclusion criteria

* Dying patients with reduced consciousness at baseline * Active Schizophrenia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life9 monthsAssessing quality of life by Qualidem, QUALID and EQ-5D.
Neuropsychiatric symptoms9 monthsDepression, anxiety an apathy will be assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version (NPI-NH).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mood or depression9 monthsAssessed by Cornell Depression Scale (range 0-38)
Pain9 monthsAssessed by Mobilisation-Observation-Behaviour-Intensity-Dementia (MOBID-2) Pain Scale (range 0-10)
Medication review9 monthsUse of medication in number of people and dose, especially use of psychotropic drugs
Drug-related problems9 monthsnumber of drug-drug-interactions using interactions database, number of drugs prescribed, number of anticholinergics prescribed, number of patients prescribed pain-medication with no pain on the MOBID-2 pain scale, number of patients with anti depressants with a low cornell depression rating scale in dementia.
Admission to hospital and mortality9 monthsQuestionnaire asking nurses wether the patient has been admitted to the hospital at month 4 and month 9.
Cost of medication9 monthsCost-utility analysis will be performed
Measure of activity9 monthsActiWatch to register sleep and activity
Nursing home activity9 monthsLog registration of NH activities
Relatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements9 monthsRelatives satisfaction with conducted KOSMOS elements with questionary
Cost-effectiveness9 monthsResource use will be registered by Resource use in dementia - formal care (RUD-FOCA)
Activities of daily living9 monthsAssessed by ADL index (range 0-18).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implementation indicators9 monthsAssessment of the quality of the implementation on each intervention by monthly visits and phone calls and review of the manuals.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026