Skip to content

Prospective, Randomized, Non-inferiority Investigation to Compare Effects of Mepitel® One and UrgoTul® Dressings in Acute Wound Management (Only)

Prospective, Randomized, Non-inferiority Investigation to Compare Effects of Mepitel® One and UrgoTul® Dressings in Acute Wound Management (Only)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02237118
Acronym
Only
Enrollment
123
Registered
2014-09-11
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2017-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Acute, wound, management, measured, Visual analoge scale

Brief summary

To compare the effects of pain of the two dressings, Mepitel® One and UrgoTul® in acute wound management.

Interventions

DEVICEUrgoTul

Sponsors

Molnlycke Health Care AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Acute wound: traumatic wound (dermabrasion, skin tears, other), benign burn requiring the use of dressings 2. Acute wound size between 3 cm² and 240 cm2 (wound could be covered by 2 investigational products maximum) 3. Wound whose duration is ≤ 3 days 4. Both gender with an age ≥ 18 years 5. Subject able to understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent 6. Subject able to follow the protocol 7. Subject insured to the French social security system

Exclusion criteria

1. Surgical wound 2. Infected, moderately to strongly exudative and haemorrhagic wound 3. Diagnosed underlying disease (e.g. diabetic neuropathy, stroke, …) which, as judged by the investigator, could interfere with the pain assessment 4. Known allergy/hypersensitivity to any of the components of the investigational products 5. Participation in other clinical investigation within one month prior to start of investigation 6. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 7. Person protected by a legal regime (tutorship or guardianship)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Non-Painful Dressing Removal, Measured by Visual Aanalog Scale (VAS)21 daysTo compare the effects of pain of the two dressings, Mepitel® One and UrgoTul®, during the first dressing removal. Pain measured by VAS Score ≥ 30 mm on the 100 mm VAS scale are reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Healing at Day 21, Will be Measured Using PictZar ( Digital Planimetric System) System.21 daysComplete healing at day 21, will be measured using PictZar system.
Condition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.21 dayswound size estimation, assesstemnt of the wound,
Safety21 daysAdverse Event, Adverse Device Event
Assessment of the Surrounding Skin.21 daysassessment of the surrounding skin.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mepitel One
Pain on dressing removal, by VAS Mepitel One UrgoTul
60
UrgoTul
Pain on dressing removal, by VAS Mepitel One UrgoTul
63
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studyconsent withdrawn10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMepitel OneUrgoTulTotal
Age, Continuous64.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.2
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23
62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.2
Age, Customized
>=65 years
29 participants32 participants61 participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
31 participants31 participants62 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
60 participants63 participants123 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants28 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants35 Participants64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 607 / 63
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 604 / 63

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Non-Painful Dressing Removal, Measured by Visual Aanalog Scale (VAS)

To compare the effects of pain of the two dressings, Mepitel® One and UrgoTul®, during the first dressing removal. Pain measured by VAS Score ≥ 30 mm on the 100 mm VAS scale are reported.

Time frame: 21 days

Population: intention to treat.Participants with None painfull dressing removal.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Mepitel OneNumber of Participants With Non-Painful Dressing Removal, Measured by Visual Aanalog Scale (VAS)44 participants
UrgoTulNumber of Participants With Non-Painful Dressing Removal, Measured by Visual Aanalog Scale (VAS)39 participants
Secondary

Assessment of the Surrounding Skin.

assessment of the surrounding skin.

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Blistering1 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Dry1 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Allergic rash0 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Trauma to wound edges1 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Skin stripping0 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Product degradation on the skin0 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Irritation2 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Hematoma5 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Maceration1 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.other1 percentage of patients
Mepitel OneAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Inflammatory signs4 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.other2 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Inflammatory signs7 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Irritation3 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Allergic rash1 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Blistering1 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Skin stripping1 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Maceration0 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Dry2 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Trauma to wound edges4 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Product degradation on the skin1 percentage of patients
UrgoTulAssessment of the Surrounding Skin.Hematoma1 percentage of patients
Secondary

Complete Healing at Day 21, Will be Measured Using PictZar ( Digital Planimetric System) System.

Complete healing at day 21, will be measured using PictZar system.

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mepitel OneComplete Healing at Day 21, Will be Measured Using PictZar ( Digital Planimetric System) System.0.89 percentage of wound size reductionStandard Deviation 1.97
UrgoTulComplete Healing at Day 21, Will be Measured Using PictZar ( Digital Planimetric System) System.0.52 percentage of wound size reductionStandard Deviation 1.09
Secondary

Condition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.

wound size estimation, assesstemnt of the wound,

Time frame: 21 days

Population: Missing value for some patients

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.Granulation tissue in growth in the dressing holesNone37 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.Granulation tissue in growth in the dressing holesMild12 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.Granulation tissue in growth in the dressing holesModerate9 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.BleedingNone41 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.BleedingMild16 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.BleedingModerate2 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.MacerationNone50 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.MacerationMild5 Participants
Mepitel OneCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.MacerationModerate4 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.MacerationMild14 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.BleedingModerate2 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.Granulation tissue in growth in the dressing holesMild13 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.Granulation tissue in growth in the dressing holesNone39 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.Granulation tissue in growth in the dressing holesModerate5 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.MacerationNone42 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.BleedingNone38 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.MacerationModerate2 Participants
UrgoTulCondition of the Wound, Will be Assesst by the Investigator.BleedingMild18 Participants
Secondary

Safety

Adverse Event, Adverse Device Event

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mepitel OneSafetySubject with Adverse Event6 Participants
Mepitel OneSafetySubject with Adverse Device Effect1 Participants
Mepitel OneSafetySubject with non AE53 Participants
UrgoTulSafetySubject with Adverse Event7 Participants
UrgoTulSafetySubject with Adverse Device Effect0 Participants
UrgoTulSafetySubject with non AE56 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026