Skip to content

First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme and Resolute Integrity in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis

Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized First-in-man Trial Examining the Safety and Efficacy of BuMA Supreme eG (Electro Grafting) Based Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent and Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus-eluting Durable Polymer Stent in Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02236975
Enrollment
168
Registered
2014-09-11
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2020-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

Prospective, multi-center, randomized 1:1, single blind trial using BuMA Supreme versus Resolute Integrity conducted in approximately 14 interventional cardiology centers in The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Portugal. Clinical follow-up will occur at 1, 9 and 12 months post-stent implantation. All patients will undergo repeat angiography at 9 months follow-up. QCA assessment will be performed at baseline (pre- and post-procedure) and at 9 months follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEBuMA Supreme Biodegradable drug coating coronary stent system
DEVICEResolute Integrity durable polymer stent system

Sponsors

Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject is at least 18 years of age. 2. Clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive territorial functional study. 3. Documented stable angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Classification 1, 2, 3 or 4) or unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald Class IB-C, IIB-C, or IIIB-C), or documented silent ischemia 4. The patient has a planned intervention of a single de-novo lesion in one or two separate major epicardial territories (LAD, LCX or RCA). 5. Diameter Stenosis≥50 and\<100%. 6. The visually estimated target lesion must be able to be covered by a single BuMA Supreme stent or a single Resolute Integrity stent (for available sizes refer to tables 1 and 2, page 20 and 21). 7. The target lesion reference diameter must be visually estimated to be ≥2.5 mm and ≤4.5 mm in diameter. 8. Written informed consent. 9. The patient agrees to the follow-up visits including a 9 month angiographic follow-up. 10. Patient must have completed the follow-up phase of any previous study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Female of child bearing potential (age \<50 years and last menstruation within the last 12 months). Subjects with age \<50 who underwent tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy can be included. 2. Evidence of ongoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ECG and/or elevated cardiac biomarkers (according to local standard hospital practice) have not returned within normal limits at the time of procedure 3. Patient suffered from stroke/TIA during the last 6 months. 4. LVEF \<30% 5. Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \>400,000 cells/mm3, a WBC of \<3,000 cells/mm3, or documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis) 6. Known renal insufficiency (e.g. serum creatinine \>2.5mg/dL, or creatinine clearance ≤30 mL/min), or subject on dialysis, or acute kidney failure (as per physician judgment). 7. Patient undergoing planned surgery within 6 months with the necessity to stop DAPT. 8. Patient requiring oral anticoagulation (Coumadin, Novel Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC)) 9. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy 10. The patient is a recipient of a heart transplant 11. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, antiplatelet medication specified for use in the study, sirolimus, zotarolimus, or cobalt-chromium. 12. Other medical illness (e.g. cancer, stroke with neurological deficiency) or known history of substance abuse (alcohol, cocaine, heroin etc.) as per physician judgment that may cause non-compliance with the protocol or confound the data interpretation or is associated with a limited life expectancy 13. The patient is simultaneously participating in another investigational device or drug study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Late Lumen LossUp to 9 monthThe primary endpoint is in-stent Late Lumen Loss (LLL) at 9 months after stent implantation as assessed by off-line QCA.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angiographic endpoint9 and 12 monthAcute Lumen Gain (mm);
Clinical endpoint9 and 12 monthAcute success (device and procedural success)
Cinical endpoint9 and 12 monthDevice-oriented Composite Endpoints (DoCE) at 1, 9 and 12 months and its individual components. (Device-oriented Composite Endpoint is defined as Cardiac Death, MI not clearly attributable to a non-intervention vessel, and clinically-indicated Target Lesion Revascularization).

Countries

Belgium, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026