Skip to content

Control of Sinus Node Tachycardia as an Additional Therapy in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure

Heart Rate Control as an Additional Therapeutic Strategy in Patients With Decompensated Heart Failure: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02236247
Acronym
CONSTATHE
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-09-10
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2017-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Decompensated Heart Failure

Keywords

ivabradine, heart rate, heart failure

Brief summary

Study aims to compare the I(f) inhibitor ivabradine with placebo as strategy of heart rate control in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF).

Detailed description

Sympathetic hyperactivity and consequent increase in heart rate (HR) are physiological responses to low cardiac output in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF). However, elevated HR may become inappropriate in these patients, increasing myocardial oxygen demand and decreasing diastolic filling time and might lead to hemodynamic deterioration, ventricular dysfunction (tachycardiomyopathy) and clinical deterioration. Studies show the elevated HR is a predictor of poor prognosis in DHF. Subanalyses of large clinical trials using beta blockers (BBs) demonstrate the adequate control of HR correlates with a better outcome in patients with stable chronic heart failure (HF). However, use of BBs in patients with DHF is limited due to negative inotropic and hypotensive effects of these drugs. As alternative to BBs, ivabradine has shown to increase survival of patients with chronic stable systolic HF. Compared to BBs, ivabradine has the advantage of pure negative chronotropic effect, no effect on myocardial contractility or peripheral vascular resistance. Despite the inhibition of I (f) has been validated as a therapeutic option in patients with stable HF, there are no studies available on this strategy in patients with DHF. We hypothesized that HR control by ivabradine might improve clinical, hemodynamic and neurohormonal parameters in patients with DHF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of HR control with ivabradine in patients with DHF.

Interventions

DRUGivabradine

5 mg oral twice daily

DRUGPlacebo

A placebo pill (identical to ivabradine) will be administered twice daily

Sponsors

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sinus node rhythm * HR\> 80 bpm * Hospitalization for DHF * Ejection fraction ≤ 40% * Sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Systolic blood pressure \<85 mmHg * Signs of hypoperfusion * Dobutamine\>15 mcg/Kg/min * Acute myocarditis * Primary valvular disease requiring surgery * Stroke in the last three months * Hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy * Sinus node disease * Atrial fibrillation or flutter * Second or third degree atrio-ventricular blockade * Long QT syndrome * Severe pulmonary disease * Pulmonary embolism in the last three months * Need for invasive ventilatory support * Septicemia or septic shock * Hepatic failure * Creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL * Hemodialysis * Advanced malignancy * Pregnancy or lactation * Immunosuppressive therapy * Use of cytochrome P450 inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline heart rateBaseline, day 5 after interventionHeart rate will be assessed at morning, after 30 minutes of rest, recorded by electrocardiogram.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline blood pressureBaseline, day 5 after interventionBlood pressure will be measured at morning by electronic cuff
Change from baseline ejection fractionBaseline, day 5 after interventionEjection fraction will be measured by echocardiography using Simpson´s rule
Change from baseline stroke volumeBaseline, day 5 after interventionStroke volume will be measured by echocardiography using Doppler velocity-time integral technique.
Change from baseline brain natriuretic peptideBaseline, day 5 after interventionSerum brain natriuretic peptide will be measured
ClinicalUp to 6 monthsTime of survival and free of readmission
Change from baseline creatinineBaseline, day 5 after interventionSerum creatinine will be measured

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety/Adverse Event Outcome MeasureUp to day 15 days after interventionNumber of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactMarco S. Alves, MD
marco.alves@incor.usp.br+55 11 981431512
Backup ContactEdimar A. Bocchi, MD-PHD
edimar.bocchi@incor.usp.br+55 11 2661-5419

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026