Skip to content

Randomized Comparison of ExoSeal® and Angio-Seal Vascular Closure Devices: The CLOSE-UP II Trial

Randomized Comparison of ExoSeal® and Angio-Seal Vascular Closure Devices: The CLOSE-UP II Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02234830
Acronym
CLOSE-UP II
Enrollment
818
Registered
2014-09-09
Start date
2012-12-21
Completion date
2017-05-14
Last updated
2017-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Disease

Keywords

PCI

Brief summary

Is the ExoSeal VSD non-inferior to Angio-Seal vascular closure device (VSD) in the incidence of adverse access site related events at 30 days.

Detailed description

Prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled, single blind, single center study in 2000 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients comparing the ExoSeal VCD (test device) to the AngioSeal VCD (standard comparator). In-hospital and 30 days safety and efficacy endpoints and 6 months safety endpoints will be reported.

Interventions

DEVICEExoseal closure device

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

DEVICEAngioseal closure device

Closure device for femoral artery access closure

Sponsors

Cordis US Corp.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Abbott Medical Devices
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Should be able to provide valid informed signed consent * PCI procedure including treatment by balloon and/or stent * PCI indicated by silent ischemia, stable angina pectoris, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Exclusion criteria

* Only coronary angiography * Multiple punctures * Active infection * Groin haematoma before the closure procedure * Sheath size \> 7 French * Known pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous (AV)-fistula in the ipsilateral groin * Prior arterial surgery in abdomen and/or lower extremities * Cardiogenic shock * Life expectancy less than one year * The patient is a female of childbearing potential with possible pregnancy or a positive pregnancy test within 7 days before the index procedure or is lactating * Simultaneous or planned subsequent femoral vein access * Allergy to any of the components in the closure material left in the groin * Puncture on same site \< 30 days * Peripheral artery disease patients can be included at operator´s discretion except if heavy calcification is present at the access site which at the operator's discretion precludes insertion of the VCD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence at 30 days of the composite endpoint of access site related major adverse vascular events (MAVE)30 daysThis includes: major bleeding and/or bleeding necessitating blood transfusion, pseudoaneurysm with indication for treatment, arteriovenous fistula, groin surgery and/or possible related vascular surgery, infection needing antibiotics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device failure30 minutesCombined endpoint of any mechanic failure, deployment failure and/or immediate profuse bleeding needing prolonged manual compression. Individual endpoints will be reported.
Vasovagal reaction until 5 minutes after end of closure procedure30 minuts
Need for new onset of manual compression30 days
Pain and discomfort related to the closure procedureClosure procedure and 30 daysAssessed on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain or discomfort) to 10 (worst possible pain or discomfort) Scripted language will be used when discussing pain scores with the patient. Pain and discomfort score will be assessed just before and immediately after the closure procedure and reported. The delta-value will be reported and compared. The patient will be given predefined standardized instructions on how to rate and that only pain and discomfort related to the closure procedure should be assessed
Time to mobilizationparticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 daysFrom start of closure procedure to patient is mobilized. Patients treated for ST-elevation myocardial infarction are assessed separately
In-hospital large groin haematomaparticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 daysLarger than 5x5 cm measured by ruler in the catheterization laboratory and at discharge
Time to haemostasis from removing the sheath (AngioSeal) or inserting the device (ExoSeal) until haemostasisparticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 daysInsignificant bleeding seen on the bandage or small continuous oozing is considered haemostasis. Continuous oozing will be counted as a Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 1 bleeding event
Major bleeding and/or bleeding necessitating blood transfusion6 months
Pseudoaneurysm with indication for treatment30 days and 6 months
Arteriovenous fistula30 days and 6 months
Groin surgery and/or possible related vascular surgery30 days and 6 months
Infection needing antibiotics30 days and 6 months
Need for medical evaluation of possible closure procedure related symptom(s)30 days
Bleedings according to the BARC definitions30 daysAccess site related and non-access site related

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026