Skip to content

Adherence in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis

Treatment Adherence in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02234713
Enrollment
71
Registered
2014-09-09
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2020-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

Disease modifying therapies (DMT) are widely used for children and adolescents with MS. Nonetheless, many pediatric patients continue to relapse and therefore require changes in therapy. We designed this research study to learn more about medication use in children and adolescents with MS. We are also interested in learning what a behavioral feedback intervention can tell us about adherence to medicine. Finally, we hope this research project will inform the way we provide clinical care for children and adolescents with MS.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMotivational Interview
OTHERVideo Attention Control

Sponsors

National Multiple Sclerosis Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Loma Linda University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Alberta Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
DeltaQuest Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adolescent boys/girls who are 10 to 17 years 11 months old; * Have a diagnosis of MS, as per revised McDonald diagnostic criteria and International Pediatric MS Study Group criteria; * Prescribed with an oral or injectable disease-modifying therapy for MS for at least six months.

Exclusion criteria

* Have non-specific white matter abnormalities and metabolic or infectious etiologies for white matter abnormalities. This is indicative of not having a true diagnosis of MS. * Patients on IV DMT will not be included in the study. * Non-English speaking patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)Baseline, 3 months, 6 monthsObjective measures included: (A) pharmacy refill data provided by site coordinators for 12 months prior to study entry and for 6 months post-study entry and (B) the MEMS cap, an EM device (MEMS, AARDEX) that captures each time the patient discards a needle from their injection or opens their pill bottle. Adherence information from MEMS caps is downloaded and stored on a secured web-platform (medAmigo™). These data were used to compile drug-dosing history data and to calculate medication adherence during the course of the study.
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsMultiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MSTAQ): Assesses missed doses, side effects and barriers of taking DMTs, and behavioral coping strategies used (e.g., icing the injection site, taking pain medication) over the past four weeks. We adapted the MSTAQ to include both oral and injectable medications. We used a standardized scoring algorithm (0-100), where higher scores reflected higher numbers of missed doses, side effects, barriers, or behavioral coping strategies. Subjects completed only the barriers items, and the parent completed all items.
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MoriskyBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsMorisky Adherence Scale (Morisky): A widely used 8-item patient-/parent-reported measure with documented reliability and validity. Total scores range from 0 to 8.The following scoring algorithm was used: 8 = high adherence, 6-7 = medium adherence, and \<6=low adherence.
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsParental involvement in DMT administration (Parental Involvement): Percentage of time the parent reported (1) reminding the child to take her/his DMT; (2) being present when the child took her/his DMT; and (3) administering the child's DMT.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsPediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL): A 23-item tool with subscales for physical, social, emotional, and school functioning. The PedsQL has documented reliability and validity, and has been used in a large number of pediatric quality-of-life studies. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsMultiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ): Neurocognitive Functioning will be assessed using the informant-report version of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ). This 15-item tool has documented high test-retest stability, predictive validity, and construct validity. Informant reports are documented to be reliably correlated with cognitive dysfunction and be less biased by patient depression. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with a higher score indicating worse cognitive functioning.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Well-Beingbaseline, three months, and six monthsAutonomy and Environmental Mastery subscale scores (Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being) will be compared at baseline, three months, and six months between the two study arms.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were assigned to a study arm after completion of the enrollment visit. Thus, any participants who consented but did not complete the enrollment visit were not assigned to a study arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Behavioural Intervention/Feedback
The behavioral interventionist will contact the patient and parent by email and telephone to schedule a telephone call to review the downloaded adherence information and discuss barriers experienced by the patient/parent using a standard script. The behavioral feedback will be administered three times: at 1-, 2- and 3-months post-baseline. Motivational Interview
25
Video Attention Control
The patients in this arm of the study will be emailed a link to an educational video about Pediatric MS and therapy for MS at three time points: 1-, 2-, and 3-months post-baseline. Video Attention Control
27
Total52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBehavioural Intervention/FeedbackVideo Attention ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
25 Participants27 Participants52 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous16.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.81
15.76 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52
16.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
13 participants16 participants29 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
12 participants11 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
13 participants10 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants17 participants29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants11 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)

Objective measures included: (A) pharmacy refill data provided by site coordinators for 12 months prior to study entry and for 6 months post-study entry and (B) the MEMS cap, an EM device (MEMS, AARDEX) that captures each time the patient discards a needle from their injection or opens their pill bottle. Adherence information from MEMS caps is downloaded and stored on a secured web-platform (medAmigo™). These data were used to compile drug-dosing history data and to calculate medication adherence during the course of the study.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)Pharmacy refill adherence0.95 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected)Standard Deviation 0.12
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)MEMs cap adherence0.81 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected)Standard Deviation 0.22
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)Pharmacy refill adherence0.86 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected)Standard Deviation 0.2
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)MEMs cap adherence0.82 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected)Standard Deviation 0.18
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)Pharmacy refill adherence0.85 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected)Standard Deviation 0.22
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)MEMs cap adherence0.66 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected)Standard Deviation 0.32
Primary

Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky

Morisky Adherence Scale (Morisky): A widely used 8-item patient-/parent-reported measure with documented reliability and validity. Total scores range from 0 to 8.The following scoring algorithm was used: 8 = high adherence, 6-7 = medium adherence, and \<6=low adherence.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MoriskyParent Morisky6.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MoriskyPatient Morisky5.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MoriskyPatient Morisky6.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MoriskyParent Morisky6.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MoriskyPatient Morisky5.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MoriskyParent Morisky6.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Primary

Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ

Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MSTAQ): Assesses missed doses, side effects and barriers of taking DMTs, and behavioral coping strategies used (e.g., icing the injection site, taking pain medication) over the past four weeks. We adapted the MSTAQ to include both oral and injectable medications. We used a standardized scoring algorithm (0-100), where higher scores reflected higher numbers of missed doses, side effects, barriers, or behavioral coping strategies. Subjects completed only the barriers items, and the parent completed all items.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ barriers50.12 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ side effects50.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.63
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQPatient MSTAQ barriers48.88 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.22
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ behavioural coping strategies49.64 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.58
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ missed doses0.06 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ missed doses0.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ behavioural coping strategies49.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.28
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ side effects49.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.58
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ barriers48.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQPatient MSTAQ barriers50.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.57
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQPatient MSTAQ barriers50.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ barriers49.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.74
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ missed doses0.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ side effects49.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.63
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQParent MSTAQ behavioural coping strategies49.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.76
Primary

Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement

Parental involvement in DMT administration (Parental Involvement): Percentage of time the parent reported (1) reminding the child to take her/his DMT; (2) being present when the child took her/his DMT; and (3) administering the child's DMT.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent administer36.27 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 41.33
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent remind44.61 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 38.83
BaselineChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent present65.20 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 37.11
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent administer32.81 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 41.95
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent present55.21 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 39.26
3-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent remind37.50 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 37.9
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent administer30.10 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 40.82
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent present57.14 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 39.53
6-month Follow upChange in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental InvolvementParent remind33.16 Percentage of timeStandard Deviation 34.76
Secondary

Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ

Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ): Neurocognitive Functioning will be assessed using the informant-report version of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ). This 15-item tool has documented high test-retest stability, predictive validity, and construct validity. Informant reports are documented to be reliably correlated with cognitive dysfunction and be less biased by patient depression. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with a higher score indicating worse cognitive functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Population: The number analyzed may differ from the overall number analyzed when not all participants completed each measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ17.90 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.42
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ17.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.41
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ20.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Secondary

Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL

Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL): A 23-item tool with subscales for physical, social, emotional, and school functioning. The PedsQL has documented reliability and validity, and has been used in a large number of pediatric quality-of-life studies. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

Population: The number analyzed may differ from the overall number analyzed when not all participants completed each measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL physical functioning82.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.85
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL social functioning82.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.56
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL school functioning68.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.27
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL social functioning83.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.85
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL emotional functioning71.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.52
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL emotional functioning73.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.61
BaselineQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL physical functioning80.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.32
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL social functioning84.27 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.74
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL physical functioning76.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.6
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL emotional functioning73.23 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.03
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL school functioning68.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.24
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL physical functioning81.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.95
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL emotional functioning69.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.44
3-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL social functioning80.63 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.34
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL physical functioning79.21 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL physical functioning80.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.34
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL social functioning82.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.36
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLPatient: PedsQL emotional functioning66.63 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL school functioning68.27 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.75
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL emotional functioning72.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.09
6-month Follow upQuality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQLParent: PedsQL social functioning84.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.06
Other Pre-specified

Well-Being

Autonomy and Environmental Mastery subscale scores (Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being) will be compared at baseline, three months, and six months between the two study arms.

Time frame: baseline, three months, and six months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026