Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Brief summary
Disease modifying therapies (DMT) are widely used for children and adolescents with MS. Nonetheless, many pediatric patients continue to relapse and therefore require changes in therapy. We designed this research study to learn more about medication use in children and adolescents with MS. We are also interested in learning what a behavioral feedback intervention can tell us about adherence to medicine. Finally, we hope this research project will inform the way we provide clinical care for children and adolescents with MS.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adolescent boys/girls who are 10 to 17 years 11 months old; * Have a diagnosis of MS, as per revised McDonald diagnostic criteria and International Pediatric MS Study Group criteria; * Prescribed with an oral or injectable disease-modifying therapy for MS for at least six months.
Exclusion criteria
* Have non-specific white matter abnormalities and metabolic or infectious etiologies for white matter abnormalities. This is indicative of not having a true diagnosis of MS. * Patients on IV DMT will not be included in the study. * Non-English speaking patients
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure) | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | Objective measures included: (A) pharmacy refill data provided by site coordinators for 12 months prior to study entry and for 6 months post-study entry and (B) the MEMS cap, an EM device (MEMS, AARDEX) that captures each time the patient discards a needle from their injection or opens their pill bottle. Adherence information from MEMS caps is downloaded and stored on a secured web-platform (medAmigo™). These data were used to compile drug-dosing history data and to calculate medication adherence during the course of the study. |
| Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MSTAQ): Assesses missed doses, side effects and barriers of taking DMTs, and behavioral coping strategies used (e.g., icing the injection site, taking pain medication) over the past four weeks. We adapted the MSTAQ to include both oral and injectable medications. We used a standardized scoring algorithm (0-100), where higher scores reflected higher numbers of missed doses, side effects, barriers, or behavioral coping strategies. Subjects completed only the barriers items, and the parent completed all items. |
| Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | Morisky Adherence Scale (Morisky): A widely used 8-item patient-/parent-reported measure with documented reliability and validity. Total scores range from 0 to 8.The following scoring algorithm was used: 8 = high adherence, 6-7 = medium adherence, and \<6=low adherence. |
| Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | Parental involvement in DMT administration (Parental Involvement): Percentage of time the parent reported (1) reminding the child to take her/his DMT; (2) being present when the child took her/his DMT; and (3) administering the child's DMT. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL): A 23-item tool with subscales for physical, social, emotional, and school functioning. The PedsQL has documented reliability and validity, and has been used in a large number of pediatric quality-of-life studies. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning. |
| Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months | Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ): Neurocognitive Functioning will be assessed using the informant-report version of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ). This 15-item tool has documented high test-retest stability, predictive validity, and construct validity. Informant reports are documented to be reliably correlated with cognitive dysfunction and be less biased by patient depression. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with a higher score indicating worse cognitive functioning. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Well-Being | baseline, three months, and six months | Autonomy and Environmental Mastery subscale scores (Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being) will be compared at baseline, three months, and six months between the two study arms. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participants were assigned to a study arm after completion of the enrollment visit. Thus, any participants who consented but did not complete the enrollment visit were not assigned to a study arm.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Behavioural Intervention/Feedback The behavioral interventionist will contact the patient and parent by email and telephone to schedule a telephone call to review the downloaded adherence information and discuss barriers experienced by the patient/parent using a standard script. The behavioral feedback will be administered three times: at 1-, 2- and 3-months post-baseline.
Motivational Interview | 25 |
| Video Attention Control The patients in this arm of the study will be emailed a link to an educational video about Pediatric MS and therapy for MS at three time points: 1-, 2-, and 3-months post-baseline.
Video Attention Control | 27 |
| Total | 52 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Behavioural Intervention/Feedback | Video Attention Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 25 Participants | 27 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 16.32 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.81 | 15.76 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52 | 16.03 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 13 participants | 16 participants | 29 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 12 participants | 11 participants | 23 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 13 participants | 10 participants | 23 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 12 participants | 17 participants | 29 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 18 Participants | 16 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants | 11 Participants | 18 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 25 | 0 / 27 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 25 | 0 / 27 |
Outcome results
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure)
Objective measures included: (A) pharmacy refill data provided by site coordinators for 12 months prior to study entry and for 6 months post-study entry and (B) the MEMS cap, an EM device (MEMS, AARDEX) that captures each time the patient discards a needle from their injection or opens their pill bottle. Adherence information from MEMS caps is downloaded and stored on a secured web-platform (medAmigo™). These data were used to compile drug-dosing history data and to calculate medication adherence during the course of the study.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure) | Pharmacy refill adherence | 0.95 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected) | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure) | MEMs cap adherence | 0.81 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected) | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure) | Pharmacy refill adherence | 0.86 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected) | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure) | MEMs cap adherence | 0.82 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected) | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure) | Pharmacy refill adherence | 0.85 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected) | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Objective Measure) | MEMs cap adherence | 0.66 Proportion of doses (actual vs expected) | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky
Morisky Adherence Scale (Morisky): A widely used 8-item patient-/parent-reported measure with documented reliability and validity. Total scores range from 0 to 8.The following scoring algorithm was used: 8 = high adherence, 6-7 = medium adherence, and \<6=low adherence.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky | Parent Morisky | 6.28 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky | Patient Morisky | 5.93 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.74 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky | Patient Morisky | 6.00 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.82 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky | Parent Morisky | 6.40 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky | Patient Morisky | 5.94 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.91 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Morisky | Parent Morisky | 6.20 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.85 |
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ
Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MSTAQ): Assesses missed doses, side effects and barriers of taking DMTs, and behavioral coping strategies used (e.g., icing the injection site, taking pain medication) over the past four weeks. We adapted the MSTAQ to include both oral and injectable medications. We used a standardized scoring algorithm (0-100), where higher scores reflected higher numbers of missed doses, side effects, barriers, or behavioral coping strategies. Subjects completed only the barriers items, and the parent completed all items.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ barriers | 50.12 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.42 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ side effects | 50.03 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.63 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Patient MSTAQ barriers | 48.88 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.22 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ behavioural coping strategies | 49.64 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.58 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ missed doses | 0.06 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ missed doses | 0.07 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ behavioural coping strategies | 49.24 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.28 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ side effects | 49.48 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.58 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ barriers | 48.66 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Patient MSTAQ barriers | 50.40 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.57 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Patient MSTAQ barriers | 50.09 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ barriers | 49.31 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.74 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ missed doses | 0.07 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ side effects | 49.04 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.63 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSTAQ | Parent MSTAQ behavioural coping strategies | 49.33 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.76 |
Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement
Parental involvement in DMT administration (Parental Involvement): Percentage of time the parent reported (1) reminding the child to take her/his DMT; (2) being present when the child took her/his DMT; and (3) administering the child's DMT.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Population: Behavioural Intervention /Feedback and Video Attention Control Arms were combined to look at changes in adherence over time (baseline, 3-months and 6-months)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent administer | 36.27 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 41.33 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent remind | 44.61 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 38.83 |
| Baseline | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent present | 65.20 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 37.11 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent administer | 32.81 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 41.95 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent present | 55.21 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 39.26 |
| 3-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent remind | 37.50 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 37.9 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent administer | 30.10 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 40.82 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent present | 57.14 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 39.53 |
| 6-month Follow up | Change in Level of Adherence in Subjects (Parent- and Patient-Reported): Parental Involvement | Parent remind | 33.16 Percentage of time | Standard Deviation 34.76 |
Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ
Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ): Neurocognitive Functioning will be assessed using the informant-report version of the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Assessment Questionnaire (MSNQ). This 15-item tool has documented high test-retest stability, predictive validity, and construct validity. Informant reports are documented to be reliably correlated with cognitive dysfunction and be less biased by patient depression. Total scores range from 0 to 60 with a higher score indicating worse cognitive functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Population: The number analyzed may differ from the overall number analyzed when not all participants completed each measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ | 17.90 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.42 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ | 17.55 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.41 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): MSNQ | 20.24 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL): A 23-item tool with subscales for physical, social, emotional, and school functioning. The PedsQL has documented reliability and validity, and has been used in a large number of pediatric quality-of-life studies. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Population: The number analyzed may differ from the overall number analyzed when not all participants completed each measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL physical functioning | 82.23 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.85 |
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL social functioning | 82.35 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.56 |
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL school functioning | 68.24 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.27 |
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL social functioning | 83.56 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.85 |
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL emotional functioning | 71.15 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.52 |
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL emotional functioning | 73.04 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.61 |
| Baseline | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL physical functioning | 80.39 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.32 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL social functioning | 84.27 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.74 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL physical functioning | 76.69 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.6 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL emotional functioning | 73.23 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.03 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL school functioning | 68.13 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.24 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL physical functioning | 81.51 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.95 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL emotional functioning | 69.57 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.44 |
| 3-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL social functioning | 80.63 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.34 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL physical functioning | 79.21 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.64 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL physical functioning | 80.93 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.34 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL social functioning | 82.65 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.36 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Patient: PedsQL emotional functioning | 66.63 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL school functioning | 68.27 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.75 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL emotional functioning | 72.30 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.09 |
| 6-month Follow up | Quality of Life and Psychosocial Outcomes (Parent- and Patient-Reported): PedsQL | Parent: PedsQL social functioning | 84.72 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.06 |
Well-Being
Autonomy and Environmental Mastery subscale scores (Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being) will be compared at baseline, three months, and six months between the two study arms.
Time frame: baseline, three months, and six months