Skip to content

Comparison of Loop-tip Cook Medical® Wire Versus Traditional Endoscopic Technique

Comparison of Loop-tip Cook Medical® Wire vs Traditional Endoscopic Technique Cannulation in the Prevention of Post-ercp Pancreatitis and Biliary Tree Access in High-risk Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02232451
Acronym
loop
Enrollment
320
Registered
2014-09-05
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2014-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complications of Surgical and Medical Care: General Terms

Keywords

loop, ERCP, cannulation, biliary, wire

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test a new guide-wire (loop-tip wire) with a loop in the tip for the prevention of PEP and biliary tree access, in post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients.

Detailed description

Selective cannulation of common bile duct (CBD) by insertion of a guide-wire seems to be associated with fewer complication and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate than the conventional biliary tree access with contrast injection even if results are conflicting. The aim of our study is to test a new guide-wire (loop-tip wire) with a loop in the tip for the prevention of PEP and biliary tree access, in PEP high-risk patients. Type of study: Multicentric, prospective and randomized trial Patients: PEP high-risk patients underwent ERCP for benign biliary pathology Number of patients: 320 patients (160 for each group) Aim: Primary end point: The evaluation of the incidence of PEP . Secondary end point: The evaluation of CBD percentage cannulation.

Interventions

DEVICEERCP with loop tip wire

Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with guide wire (loop-tip) for CBD cannulation

DEVICEERCP for cannulation

Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography with traditional technique for CBD cannulation

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* high risk patients for post-ERCP pancreatitis

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 yrs * allergy to the contrast medium * previous surgery * neoplastic bilio-pancreatic disease * previous EBS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The evaluation of the incidence of PEPloop20216

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The evaluation of CBD percentage cannulation.loop20216

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026