Skip to content

IX-01 Effect on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) and Patient Reported Outcomes in Men With Premature Ejaculation (PE)

An 8-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effect of IX-01 on Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) and Patient Reported Outcomes in Men With Lifelong Premature Ejaculation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02232425
Enrollment
88
Registered
2014-09-05
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2020-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Premature Ejaculation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of IX-01 in men with lifelong premature ejaculation.

Interventions

DRUGIX-01
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Carelon Research
CollaboratorOTHER
Novotech (Australia) Pty Limited
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
ICON plc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
PHT Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ixchelsis Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* In stable (≥ 6 months) heterosexual relationship * Have life-long (primary) premature ejaculation * Have premature ejaculation confirmed by Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) less than or equal to (≤) 1 minute on ≥ 75% attempts at sexual intercourse * Meet other aspects of the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) definition for lifelong premature ejaculation (PE), including inability to delay ejaculation on all or nearly all vaginal penetrations and negative personal consequences such as distress, bother and frustration * Willing to attempt intercourse at least 4 times during run-in period and at least 8 more times during double-blind part of the study * Not planning pregnancy with his partner and he is willing to use contraception (unless not of child-bearing potential, e.g., surgically sterilised) * Willing to limit use of alcohol on days in which they take study drug (not more than three drinks, where one drink is defined as a 12 ounce (oz), 360 milliliter (mL) bottle of beer, a 5 oz (150 mL) glass of wine, or a 1½ oz (45 mL distilled spirits) * Capable of giving written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* An Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) value ≥ 2 minutes during run-in period * Less than (\<) 4 attempts at sexual intercourse during run-in (screening may be extended or patient may be rescreened if there are extenuating circumstances) * A rating of control of ejaculation as fair, good, or very good on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) questionnaire prior to study * Co-existing Erectile Dysfunction - International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) erectile function domain \< 22 during run-in * Concomitant use of Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, intracavernosal injections, penile implants, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI's) or Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SSNRI's), tricyclic antidepressants (for example (e.g.) clomipramine), monoamine oxidase inhibitors, alpha blockers, 5 alpha reductase inhibitors (including propecia for hair loss), topical anaesthetics, and/or tramadol * History (last 6 months) of use of Botox or similar product to treat premature ejaculation * Unwilling to stop other treatments for premature ejaculation (including but not limited to pharmacological, herbal, multiple condoms, psychosexual treatment, prior masturbation) * Other sexual disorder of patient or partner that could interfere with results * Current active sexually transmitted disease * Major medical condition of patient that could interfere with ability to have sexual activity and or require hospital treatment * Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2 * Participation in a clinical drug trial anytime during the 30 days prior to screening * Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or hepatitis B * History of clinically significant prostate disease * History of myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, coronary artery angioplasty, unstable angina, clinically evident congestive heart failure, cardiac pacemaker, or cerebrovascular accident * Cardiac arrhythmia: significant cardiac arrhythmia shown on Electrocardiogram (ECG), or a known or suspected history of significant cardiac arrhythmias within last six months * History of congenital QT prolongation and/ corrected QT (QTc) interval \> 450 milliseconds (msec) using the Bazett formula * Mean systolic cuff blood pressure (BP) \> 140 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), as assessed by up to three measurements taken in sequence within 5-10 minutes of last measure * Mean diastolic cuff BP \> 90 mmHg, as assessed by up to three measurements taken in sequence within 5-10 minutes of the last measure * Major psychiatric disease or risk of suicidal tendency as assessed by clinical evaluation and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and Columbia Suicide Assessment * PHQ-9 questionnaire total score \> 9 and/or score \> 0 for question 9 of PHQ-9, and/or suicidal ideation or behavior as assessed by Columbia Suicide Assessment * Clinically significant abnormal laboratory function test results (including liver enzymes \> 2 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) or bilirubin \> 1.5 x ULN) * Taking Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers, or moderate and potent CYP3A4 inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineIX-01 versus placebo. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineIntravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred. Outcome measured proportion of patients with at least a 2.5-fold increase in geometric mean IELT over the last 4 weeks of treatment as compared to baseline. Proportion of participants adjusted for baseline IELT, country and site
Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time)Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineIX-01 versus placebo
Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of EjaculationLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineReported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer) scored as 0 to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4)
Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal DistressLast 4 weeks of treatment compared to baselineBased on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) QuestionnaireBaseline to 8 weeksBased on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worse answer) to 4 (best answer).
Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) ScaleBaseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better(2) or much better (3)\] on this 7 point scale
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) QuestionnaireBaseline to 8 weeksReported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) QuestionnaireBaseline to 8 weeksReported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) MeasureBaseline to 8 weeksReported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Each of the PEP questions is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)
Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on TreatmentBaseline to last 4 weeks on treatment'Baseline' time period defined as Day -28 - Day 0. 'Last 4 Weeks' time period defined as the 28 days prior to last time subject took study drug and after Day 14. Analysis excludes two subjects from ITT population: #010-012 (placebo) and #888-018 (active). Adjusted for treatment, baseline IELT, baseline percentage, country and site.
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsStart of Treatment to end of study (approximately 10 weeks)Number of participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) QuestionnaireBaseline to 8 weeksReported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)

Countries

Australia, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Drug: IX-01
Two to four 200 mg capsules administered orally, 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity IX-01
58
Placebo
Two to four capsules administered orally, 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity Placebo
30
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event20
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up62
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject56

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDrug: IX-01TotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants12 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
48 Participants76 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
48 Participants69 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
11 participants18 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
47 participants70 participants23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants88 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 569 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 560 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)

IX-01 versus placebo. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred

Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

Population: Efficacy data set excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Drug: IX-01Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)2.1 No units for fold change
PlaceboMean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)1.1 No units for fold change
Secondary

Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment

'Baseline' time period defined as Day -28 - Day 0. 'Last 4 Weeks' time period defined as the 28 days prior to last time subject took study drug and after Day 14. Analysis excludes two subjects from ITT population: #010-012 (placebo) and #888-018 (active). Adjusted for treatment, baseline IELT, baseline percentage, country and site.

Time frame: Baseline to last 4 weeks on treatment

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Drug: IX-01Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment37.6 percentage of attempts
PlaceboChange in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment13.5 percentage of attempts
Secondary

Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Number of participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event

Time frame: Start of Treatment to end of study (approximately 10 weeks)

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events12 participants
PlaceboIncidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events9 participants
Secondary

Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation

Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer) scored as 0 to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4)

Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Drug: IX-01Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation0.42 units on a scale
PlaceboMean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation-0.03 units on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress

Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Drug: IX-01Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress0.63 units on a scale
PlaceboMean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress0.03 units on a scale
Secondary

Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time)

IX-01 versus placebo

Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Drug: IX-01Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time)3.6 No units for fold change
PlaceboMean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time)1.8 No units for fold change
Secondary

Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale

7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better(2) or much better (3)\] on this 7 point scale

Time frame: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) ScaleBetter/Much Better0.17 proportion of participants
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) ScaleAny Improvement0.44 proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) ScaleBetter/Much Better0 proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) ScaleAny Improvement0.13 proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire

Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)

Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire0.56 adjusted proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire0.36 adjusted proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire

Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire0.60 adjusted proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire0.36 adjusted proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire

Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire0.60 adjusted proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire0.48 adjusted proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire

Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worse answer) to 4 (best answer).

Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire0.53 adjusted proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire0.30 adjusted proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure

Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Each of the PEP questions is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)

Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure0.17 proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure0 proportion of participants
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)

Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred. Outcome measured proportion of patients with at least a 2.5-fold increase in geometric mean IELT over the last 4 weeks of treatment as compared to baseline. Proportion of participants adjusted for baseline IELT, country and site

Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline

Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Drug: IX-01Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)0.31 Proportion of participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)0.07 Proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026