Premature Ejaculation
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of IX-01 in men with lifelong premature ejaculation.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* In stable (≥ 6 months) heterosexual relationship * Have life-long (primary) premature ejaculation * Have premature ejaculation confirmed by Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) less than or equal to (≤) 1 minute on ≥ 75% attempts at sexual intercourse * Meet other aspects of the International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) definition for lifelong premature ejaculation (PE), including inability to delay ejaculation on all or nearly all vaginal penetrations and negative personal consequences such as distress, bother and frustration * Willing to attempt intercourse at least 4 times during run-in period and at least 8 more times during double-blind part of the study * Not planning pregnancy with his partner and he is willing to use contraception (unless not of child-bearing potential, e.g., surgically sterilised) * Willing to limit use of alcohol on days in which they take study drug (not more than three drinks, where one drink is defined as a 12 ounce (oz), 360 milliliter (mL) bottle of beer, a 5 oz (150 mL) glass of wine, or a 1½ oz (45 mL distilled spirits) * Capable of giving written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* An Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) value ≥ 2 minutes during run-in period * Less than (\<) 4 attempts at sexual intercourse during run-in (screening may be extended or patient may be rescreened if there are extenuating circumstances) * A rating of control of ejaculation as fair, good, or very good on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) questionnaire prior to study * Co-existing Erectile Dysfunction - International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) erectile function domain \< 22 during run-in * Concomitant use of Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, intracavernosal injections, penile implants, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI's) or Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SSNRI's), tricyclic antidepressants (for example (e.g.) clomipramine), monoamine oxidase inhibitors, alpha blockers, 5 alpha reductase inhibitors (including propecia for hair loss), topical anaesthetics, and/or tramadol * History (last 6 months) of use of Botox or similar product to treat premature ejaculation * Unwilling to stop other treatments for premature ejaculation (including but not limited to pharmacological, herbal, multiple condoms, psychosexual treatment, prior masturbation) * Other sexual disorder of patient or partner that could interfere with results * Current active sexually transmitted disease * Major medical condition of patient that could interfere with ability to have sexual activity and or require hospital treatment * Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2 * Participation in a clinical drug trial anytime during the 30 days prior to screening * Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or hepatitis B * History of clinically significant prostate disease * History of myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, coronary artery angioplasty, unstable angina, clinically evident congestive heart failure, cardiac pacemaker, or cerebrovascular accident * Cardiac arrhythmia: significant cardiac arrhythmia shown on Electrocardiogram (ECG), or a known or suspected history of significant cardiac arrhythmias within last six months * History of congenital QT prolongation and/ corrected QT (QTc) interval \> 450 milliseconds (msec) using the Bazett formula * Mean systolic cuff blood pressure (BP) \> 140 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), as assessed by up to three measurements taken in sequence within 5-10 minutes of last measure * Mean diastolic cuff BP \> 90 mmHg, as assessed by up to three measurements taken in sequence within 5-10 minutes of the last measure * Major psychiatric disease or risk of suicidal tendency as assessed by clinical evaluation and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and Columbia Suicide Assessment * PHQ-9 questionnaire total score \> 9 and/or score \> 0 for question 9 of PHQ-9, and/or suicidal ideation or behavior as assessed by Columbia Suicide Assessment * Clinically significant abnormal laboratory function test results (including liver enzymes \> 2 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) or bilirubin \> 1.5 x ULN) * Taking Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inducers, or moderate and potent CYP3A4 inhibitors
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | IX-01 versus placebo. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred. Outcome measured proportion of patients with at least a 2.5-fold increase in geometric mean IELT over the last 4 weeks of treatment as compared to baseline. Proportion of participants adjusted for baseline IELT, country and site |
| Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time) | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | IX-01 versus placebo |
| Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer) scored as 0 to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4) |
| Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress | Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline | Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | Baseline to 8 weeks | Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worse answer) to 4 (best answer). |
| Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale | Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks) | 7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better(2) or much better (3)\] on this 7 point scale |
| Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire | Baseline to 8 weeks | Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | Baseline to 8 weeks | Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure | Baseline to 8 weeks | Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Each of the PEP questions is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer) |
| Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment | Baseline to last 4 weeks on treatment | 'Baseline' time period defined as Day -28 - Day 0. 'Last 4 Weeks' time period defined as the 28 days prior to last time subject took study drug and after Day 14. Analysis excludes two subjects from ITT population: #010-012 (placebo) and #888-018 (active). Adjusted for treatment, baseline IELT, baseline percentage, country and site. |
| Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events | Start of Treatment to end of study (approximately 10 weeks) | Number of participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event |
| Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | Baseline to 8 weeks | Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer) |
Countries
Australia, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 Two to four 200 mg capsules administered orally, 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
IX-01 | 58 |
| Placebo Two to four capsules administered orally, 1-6 hours prior to sexual activity
Placebo | 30 |
| Total | 88 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Drug: IX-01 | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 43 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 43 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 10 Participants | 12 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 48 Participants | 76 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 6 Participants | 11 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 48 Participants | 69 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 11 participants | 18 participants | 7 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 47 participants | 70 participants | 23 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 58 Participants | 88 Participants | 30 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 56 | 9 / 30 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 56 | 0 / 30 |
Outcome results
Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)
IX-01 versus placebo. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Population: Efficacy data set excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) | 2.1 No units for fold change |
| Placebo | Mean Fold Change in Geometric Mean Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) | 1.1 No units for fold change |
Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment
'Baseline' time period defined as Day -28 - Day 0. 'Last 4 Weeks' time period defined as the 28 days prior to last time subject took study drug and after Day 14. Analysis excludes two subjects from ITT population: #010-012 (placebo) and #888-018 (active). Adjusted for treatment, baseline IELT, baseline percentage, country and site.
Time frame: Baseline to last 4 weeks on treatment
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment | 37.6 percentage of attempts |
| Placebo | Change in Percentage of Intercourse Attempts Lasting Longer Than 1 Minute From Baseline to Last 4 Weeks on Treatment | 13.5 percentage of attempts |
Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Number of participants with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event
Time frame: Start of Treatment to end of study (approximately 10 weeks)
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Incidence of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events | 9 participants |
Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP question on control of timing is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from very poor (this is the worst answer) scored as 0 to very good (this is the best answer scored as 4)
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation | 0.42 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Mean Change in Score on Control of Timing of Ejaculation | -0.03 units on a scale |
Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress
Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress | 0.63 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Mean Change in Score on Ejaculation-related Personal Distress | 0.03 units on a scale |
Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time)
IX-01 versus placebo
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time) | 3.6 No units for fold change |
| Placebo | Mean Fold Change in Arithmetic IELT (Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time) | 1.8 No units for fold change |
Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale
7 point scale ranging from much worse (-3) to much better (3). The proportion refers to the proportion of patients who had the best 2 possible responses \[better(2) or much better (3)\] on this 7 point scale
Time frame: Baseline to the end of treatment (approximately 8 weeks)
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale | Better/Much Better | 0.17 proportion of participants |
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale | Any Improvement | 0.44 proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale | Better/Much Better | 0 proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants Rating Their PE as Better or Much Better, on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale | Any Improvement | 0.13 proportion of participants |
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
Reported in electronic diary and based on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). PEP is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | 0.56 adjusted proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Control Over Ejaculation During Sexual Intercourse on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | 0.36 adjusted proportion of participants |
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire | 0.60 adjusted proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Distress on the Premature Ejaculation Profile ( PEP) Questionnaire | 0.36 adjusted proportion of participants |
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Scale ranges from 'extremely' (0) to 'not at all' (4). An increase in score from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | 0.60 adjusted proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Ejaculation-related Interpersonal Difficulty on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | 0.48 adjusted proportion of participants |
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire
Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worse answer) to 4 (best answer).
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | 0.53 adjusted proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 1 Category of Improvement in Satisfaction With Sexual Intercourse, on the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) Questionnaire | 0.30 adjusted proportion of participants |
Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure
Reported in e-diary. Based on Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP). Each of the PEP questions is scored on a 5 point scale with the scores ranging from 0 (worst answer) to 4 (best answer)
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure | 0.17 proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants With ≥ 2 Category Increase in Control and ≥ 1 Category Decrease in Personal Distress on a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure | 0 proportion of participants |
Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT)
Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) was defined as the time from the initiation of sexual intercourse (penetration) until ejaculation occurred. Outcome measured proportion of patients with at least a 2.5-fold increase in geometric mean IELT over the last 4 weeks of treatment as compared to baseline. Proportion of participants adjusted for baseline IELT, country and site
Time frame: Last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline
Population: Intent to treat, excluding outliers
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug: IX-01 | Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) | 0.31 Proportion of participants |
| Placebo | Proportion of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 2.5 Fold Increase in Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time (IELT) | 0.07 Proportion of participants |