Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Burn pain, lidocaine, donor site pain, Narcotic use
Brief summary
Burn pain is known to be one the most severe forms of acute pain often requiring large amounts of narcotics in addition to other adjuvants. Topical lidocaine is effective for controlling pain in various settings including dressing changes of burns. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of topical lidocaine in decreasing pain scores and narcotic requirements when applied to donor graft sites while at the same time not interfering with the standard of care TheraBond dressing. During this study the investiagtors will be monitoring for evidence of delayed wound healing, and surgical site infection.
Detailed description
Pain from burns is a severe form of acute pain that requires aggressive use of opioids. Even with the implementation of multiple modalities for analgesia, pain from skin debridements and grafting procedures remains a challenge to control. Local anesthetics have been used for pain relief in burn patients previously as a topical gel or IV infusion and have been found to significantly reduce medication consumption, without apparent adverse effects on wound healing. Lidocaine actually has potent anti-inflammatory effects which could be advantageous on wounds. In addition, topical application of lidocaine to wounds result in different degrees of systemic absorption. High concentrations of lidocaine have potential for central nervous system (seizures (\>5mg/L)) and cardiovascular toxicity (arrhythmias (\>9mg/L)). Plasma concentration of lidocaine depend upon drug dose, rate of absorption, patient weight, physical status and thickness of skin harvested. A prior study where up to 6.7mg/kg of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was sprayed on donor graft sites found that systemic lidocaine levels were far below toxic levels at their peak (average level of 1.4, with maximum level at 2.2). In this study the levels peaked between 30 and 60 minutes and systemic levels of lidocaine were detectable 6 hours following application of the solution. Studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of systemic lidocaine administered via IV infusions in reducing perioperative pain scores.Topical lidocaine is effective as a topical anesthetic in multiple clinical trials however only two studies to date has shown that topical lidocaine applied to skin-harvest sites produces an analgesic effect, reduces narcotic requirements while not affecting wound healing or causing toxic blood concentrations. In both these studies systemic intravenous lidocaine levels were monitored and were found to be significantly below toxic limits. The use of topical lidocaine on donor sites is still not widely used, partly for fear the lidocaine will interfere with wound healing and/or dressing adherence. No study to date has demonstrated lidocaine solution to be effective on burn sites when used in conjunction with TheraBond silver foam dressing. TheraBond is an absorbent, atraumatic dressing coated with ionic silver that is routinely used on donor sites at the University of Florida. This study will also offer additional supporting evidence that topical lidocaine is effective in post operative pain management of donor skin sites and should be more widely utilized. In addition, this study will serve as a stepping stone for analyzing different local anesthetic solutions in the future and the potential for reapplication to surgical sites. The purpose of this study is to offer the medical community data on a simple and relatively cheap adjuvant that can be utilized to help reduce the amount of post-operative pain and narcotic requirement in burn patients requiring skin grafts.
Interventions
Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of lidocaine 2% in isotonic saline (Solution A) sprayed on the donor site of the grafted skin prior to emergence from general anesthesia. A total maximum of 7mg/kg of lidocaine solution will be available for administration. Prior to spraying of the Solution A, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.
Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of isotonic saline (Solution B) sprayed over the donor site. Prior to spraying of the Solution B, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients who have suffered second to third degree burns requiring a single split thickness skin graft surgery. * Donor sites will be between 3-15% TBSA.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who have history of chronic pain, * opioid abuse history, * major renal and/or liver dysfunction, * history of seizures or major neurologic deficiencies, * allergy to local anesthetics, * reported allergy to hydromorphone, * pregnancy, or * currently have other injuries that significantly contribute to pain (i.e. multi-trauma patients) will be excluded from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Change | 24 hours | Improvement of pain perception for those receiving lidocaine vs those that do not. Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain. |
| Pain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records) | Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op | Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours | Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op | This was an intention to treat analysis. records and improvement was change from immediate post-op to 24 hours post-op (pain at 24 hours minus pain immediate postop) Assessment. Hydromorphone was quantified as morphine milligram equivelents (MME). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Lidocaine Treatment Group Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of lidocaine 2% in isotonic saline (Solution A) sprayed on the donor site of the grafted skin prior to emergence from general anesthesia. A total maximum of 7mg/kg of lidocaine solution will be available for administration. Prior to spraying of the Solution A, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.
Lidocaine: Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of lidocaine 2% in isotonic saline (Solution A) sprayed on the donor site of the grafted skin prior to emergence from general anesthesia. A total maximum of 7mg/kg of lidocaine solution will be available for administration. Prior to spraying of the Solution A, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care. | 16 |
| Placebo Treatment Group Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of isotonic saline (Solution B) sprayed over the donor site. Prior to spraying of the Solution B, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care.
Placebo: Subjects in this group will receive a nonpyrogenic solution of isotonic saline (Solution B) sprayed over the donor site. Prior to spraying of the Solution B, the donor site will be soaked with epinephrine soaked towels as per routine burn care. The site will then be covered with TheraBond dressing as per standard burn care. | 12 |
| Total | 28 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Lidocaine Treatment Group | Placebo Treatment Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 43.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1 | 44.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7 | 43.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 15 Participants | 11 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 16 participants | 12 participants | 28 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 1 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 22 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 16 | 0 / 12 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 5 / 16 | 3 / 12 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 5 / 16 | 2 / 12 |
Outcome results
Pain Change
Improvement of pain perception for those receiving lidocaine vs those that do not. Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain.
Time frame: 24 hours
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine Treatment Group | Pain Change | -3.8 units on a scale |
| Placebo Treatment Group | Pain Change | -4.0 units on a scale |
Pain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records)
Pain will be measured by the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain.
Time frame: Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op
Population: This was an intention to treat analysis. Pain was measured with self reported pain from electronic health records and improvement was change from immediate post-op to 24 hours post-op (pain at 24 hours minus pain immediate postop) Assessment
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine Treatment Group | Pain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records) | -2.1 units on a scale |
| Placebo Treatment Group | Pain Change in 24 Hours (Self Reported Pain From Electronic Health Records) | -4.0 units on a scale |
Change in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours
This was an intention to treat analysis. records and improvement was change from immediate post-op to 24 hours post-op (pain at 24 hours minus pain immediate postop) Assessment. Hydromorphone was quantified as morphine milligram equivelents (MME).
Time frame: Immediate post-op to 24 hours post op
Population: This was an intention to treat analysis. records and improvement was change from immediate post-op to 24 hours post-op (pain at 24 hours minus pain immediate postop) Assessment. There were n=3 in lidocaine group with no medication doses reported.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine Treatment Group | Change in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours | 0.4 milligram morphine equivalents (MME) |
| Placebo Treatment Group | Change in Hydromorphone in 24 Hours | 4.7 milligram morphine equivalents (MME) |