Skip to content

Effectiveness of a Computerised Prompt for Primary and Secondary Care Physicians to Refer or Refer Back Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Effectiveness of a Computerised Prompt for Primary and Secondary Care Physicians to Refer or Refer Back Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02229110
Enrollment
2779
Registered
2014-08-29
Start date
2013-10-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

type 2 diabetes mellitus, e-Health, allocation of care, clinical inertia, quality of care, patient satisfaction

Brief summary

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus can receive care in the general practice or at the outpatient clinic. In the region of Amersfoort in The Netherlands, primary care practices and the hospital are connected through Diamuraal to organize the diabetes care in that region. They work in the same electronic medical record, and patients can request access to their own record (called a patient web portal). They set up Diamuraal guidelines, based on the guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners and Internists, on where the patient care needs to be allocated (primary or secondary care), depending on the amount of specific care a patient needs. Despite guidelines, not all patients are treated in the correct place. Our hypotheses is that when we improve triage we can cause a major shift from treatment in secondary care to primary care and from primary care to self-care by using the patient web portal. Furthermore, patients who needs extra attention due to problems with their diabetes or complications can receive this extra attention due to increased e-consultation between primary care and secondary care and if necessary actually can, during a short time, be treated by an internist. We hope to achieve this by introducing a signal in the electronic medical record. This signal allocates patients according to the guidelines and warns a physician if their patients is not treated according to that guideline. The health care provider can then discuss this situation with his patient. We believe that this leads to shift in allocation of care, in which optimal care is provided and patients are made more aware of their situation which hopefully leads to better self-management and satisfaction.

Interventions

OTHERSignal

Automatic signal in the electronic medical record

Sponsors

UMC Utrecht
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus * health care provider work within Diamuraal setting

Exclusion criteria

\- none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The number of participants with change in allocation of care after interventionOne yearOne of the following: 1. shift from primary care to secondary care 2. shift from secondary care to primary care 3. continuation of treatment in primary care but with addition of e-consultation with secondary care 4. continuation of treatment in primary care but with replacement of one or more office visits in self-control

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assembly of reasons by health care providers for not following the guidelinesOne year
Change in quality of diabetes careOne yearMeasured with Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes scoring system (QuED) containing scores for biomedical data (HbA1c, blood pressure, lipids, medication regimen, number of measurements)
Change in diabetes treatment satisfactionOne yearMeasured with the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ): six questions on satisfaction with treatment regimen and two questions on perceived frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia.
Number of participants who meet their treatment goalsOne yearMeasured in number of goals that are met

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026