Skip to content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Neupro® (Rotigotine) and L-dopa Combination Therapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

A Multi-center Noninterventional Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Neupro® (Rotigotine Transdermal Patch) and Levodopa Combination Therapy in Patients With Parkinson's Disease (NEUPART)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02227355
Acronym
NEUPART
Enrollment
195
Registered
2014-08-28
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2016-07-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

Parkinson's Disease, Neupro®, Rotigotine, Transdermal patch, NEUPART, Levodopa, Noninterventional, Combination therapy

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Rotigotine and Levodopa combination therapy for younger and older patients with Parkinson's Disease under real life conditions. Effects on ability to perform activities of daily living, sleep, medication dose and other factors will be assessed.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

PRA Health Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The following selection criteria must be followed for patients entering the Noninterventional Study (NIS): * The decision by the treating physician to prescribe Rotigotine transdermal patch is made before participating in the NIS due to a clinical therapeutic indication (e.g., because of intolerance and/or ineffectiveness of another dopamine agonist) * The patient is either male or female and over 18 years of age * A Patient Data Consent form is signed and dated by the patient or by the legal representative * The patient has idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, has not received Rotigotine within 28 days prior to the Baseline Visit and is willing to participate in questionnaire based assessments * The patient is receiving L-dopa as monotherapy or a combination therapy composed of L-dopa and a dopamine agonist other than Rotigotine * The patient has been on L-dopa therapy for at least 6 months and is responding to initial L-dopa therapy * The patient has a Hoehn and Yahr stage score of 1 to 4.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients will be excluded from the study if they have participated in a clinical study of a medication or a medical device within 3 months prior to Baseline or if they are participating in a clinical study at the time of inclusion or have already participated in the current study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline to end of the Observational Period in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II (UPDRS Part II) total scoreBaseline to end of Observational Period (6 months)The UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) consists of 13 items, each to be scored between 0 (normal/none) and 4 (highest level of severity). The sum score is calculated as the sum of the 13 individual scores (13 questions=52 points maximum; the higher the sum score, the greater degree of disability).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline to end of the Observational Period in L-dopa doseBaseline to end of Observational Period (6 months)
Change from Baseline to end of the Observation Period in Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS-2) total scoreBaseline to end of Observational Period (6 months)The PDSS-2 is a 15 item scale that is used to assess sleep and nocturnal disability in Parkinson's Disease. It is designed for interviewer-administered completion or self-completion by patients. Patients are asked to rate how often during the past week he/she slept well or experienced various symptoms of sleep disability. Each of the 15 items are to be scored between 0 (never) to 4 (very often) with the total score ranging from 0 to 60; the higher the sum score, the greater the degree of impairment.
Response at the end of the Observation Period defined as 20 % decrease in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II (UPDRS Part II) total scoreEnd of the Observation Period (Month 6)The UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) consists of 13 items, each to be scored between 0 (normal/none) and 4 (highest level of severity). The sum score is calculated as the sum of the 13 individual scores (13 questions = 52 points maximum); the higher the sum score, the greater degree of disability.
Assessment at the end of the Observation Period in the score of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 2 (Global Rating of Change of Condition)End of the Observation Period (Month 6)CGI Item 2 (Global Rating of Change of Condition) requires the clinician to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. Scores range from 0 to 7 as follows: 0=not assessed, 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse.

Countries

France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026