Skip to content

Single-Agent Glasdegib In Patients With Myelofibrosis Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib

A Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized Safety And Efficacy Study Of Glasdegib (Pf-04449913) Versus Placebo In Patients With Myelofibrosis Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02226172
Enrollment
21
Registered
2014-08-27
Start date
2014-10-06
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2019-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Myelofibrosis; Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis; Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis

Keywords

Primary myelofibrosis, Secondary myelofibrosis, PMF, PET-MF, PPV-MF, Ruxolitinib resistant or intolerant, previously treated myelofibrosis, smoothened inhibitor, oral, single agent.

Brief summary

A lead-in cohort of \ 20 patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors enrolled to single-agent glasdegib to evaluate safety and tolerability. Following the lead-in, a phase 2, double blind, 2-arm study, randomized 2:1 to oral single-agent glasdegib versus placebo in 201 patients resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib.

Interventions

DRUGGlasdegib (PF-04449913)

Oral daily dose of glasdegib (PF-04449913) 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.

DRUGPlacebo

Oral daily dose of placebo 100 mg tablet in a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary MF (PMF) or secondary MF (PET-MF and PPV-MF) as per WHO 2008 criteria. * Lead-in cohort: resistant or intolerant to 1 or more Janus kinase inhibitors (licensed or experimental). * Randomized cohort: resistant or intolerant to prior ruxolitinib therapy. Documentation by the Investigator that the patient has exhausted available treatment options (eg, resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea, etc). * Spleen 5 cm below the inferior left costal margin as measured by manual palpation. * Active symptomatic MF as defined by the screening MPN-SAD patient-reported instrument requiring a severity score of at least 5 on one symptom, or a severity score of ≥ 3 on at least two of the symptoms (on a 0 to 10 scale). * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, 2, or 3. * Adequate organ function, demonstrated by the following laboratory values: 1. Absolute Neutrophil Count 75 x 10(9)/L; 2. Platelet count \>50 x 10(9)/L with no evidence of bleeding and not requiring platelet transfusions; 3. Serum creatinine \<1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or estimated creatinine clearance 60 mL/min (as calculated using the standard method of the institution); 4. Serum amylase or lipase \<1.5 x ULN; 5. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase values 3.0 x ULN (or 5x ULN in the case of patients with MF accompanied by hepatic extramedullary hematopoiesis, as manifested by any degree of hepatomegaly). 6. Total bilirubin values \<1.5 x ULN unless the bilirubin is principally unconjugated (in the context of hemolysis) or there is documented Gilbert's disease. 7. Serum electrolyte values \< Grade 2 (sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorous and magnesium), per CTCAE v.4.03. * Recovery to Grade 1 from all clinically significant adverse events related to prior MF therapy, including transplant-related toxicities. * More than 2 months out from allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant prior to randomization. * Must be able to undergo MRI of abdomen (spleen and liver). Patients who are contra indicated for MRI may be enrolled and evaluated by CT scan at the discretion of the Sponsor. * 18 years of age. * Male subjects able to father children and female patients of childbearing potential and at risk for pregnancy must agree to use two highly effective methods of contraception throughout the study and for 90 days after the last dose of assigned treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior treatment with a licensed or experimental smoothened inhibitor. * Randomized cohort only: Prior treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor other than ruxolitinib. * Other anti-cancer therapy up to 14 days prior to enrollment, with the exception of hydroxyurea, which can be given up to 4 days prior to enrollment. * Splenic irradiation 3 months prior to enrollment. * History of congenital long QT syndrome, or a baseline \>470 msec QTcF abnormality (average of the triplicate reading). * Evidence of significant cardiac disease, for example: symptomatic cardiac heart failure (CHF, NYHA class 3), complete bundle branch block, significant atrial or ventricular tachyarrhythmias and any unstable cardiac arrhythmias requiring medication. * History of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to enrollment. * Uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease, peptic ulcer disease or history of significant gastro intestinal bleeding within 6 months of enrollment. * Any condition requiring chronic use of moderate/high dose steroids (equivalent to 10 mg QD prednisone). * Hematopoietic growth factor receptor agonists (eg, erythropoietin (Epo), granulocyte colony stimulating factor, romiplostim, eltrombopag within 28 days of enrollment. * Currently active malignancy (other than MF). Prior malignancies are allowed so long as there is no evidence of disease recurrence within the last 2 years (with the exception of fully excised, non-complicated basal cell carcinoma which can have been active within the prior 2 years, and certain localized, non-invasive fully excised skin, cervical, breast, prostate or bladder tumors). * Prior history of chronic liver disease (eg, chronic alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, hemachromatosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis \[NASH\]). * Active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal or viral infection, including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, known human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome related illness. * Active graft versus host disease (GVHD) with other than grade 1 skin involvement or GVHD requiring immunosuppressive treatment. * Uncontrolled disseminated intravascular coagulation. * Current (including their administration within 3 days prior to study entry) use or anticipated need for food or drugs that are strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. * Current use or anticipated requirement for drugs that are known strong CYP3A4/5 inducers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT) Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized CohortWeek 24The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in CohortBaseline up to Week 131An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in CohortBaseline up to Week 131Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse event.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in CohortBaseline up to Week 131AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability; congenital anomaly.Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death. Only categories with at least 1 participant with event were reported.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in CohortBaseline up to Week 131Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN greater than (\>)1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN \>1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\*ULN,uric acid \>1.2\*ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in CohortBaseline up to Week 131Anemia (grade \[g\]1:\< LLN to 10 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\],g2:\<10 to 8g/dL,g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/millimeter\[mm\]\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (Absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count(g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin (g1:increase in hemoglobin level \>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2:increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g3: increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in CohortBaseline up to Week 131ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN,g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN,g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500, g4:\>500mg/dL);bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN);hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55,g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30,g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L);hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3, g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L);hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8, g4:\>8mg/dL);hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL); hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9,g3:\<0.9-0.7, g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3 2,g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2, g3:\<2-1, g4:\<1mg/dL).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥50% as Measured by MRI/CT Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized CohortWeek 24The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall TSS in the Randomized CohortWeeks 12, 24, 36 and 48The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Randomized CohortBaseline to end of treatmentThe double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Participant Reported Outcomes of Health Related Quality of Life and Health Status in the Randomised CohortBaseline to end of treatmentThe double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Median Duration of SVR in the Randomized CohortBaseline to end of treatmentThe double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Randomized CohortBaseline to end of treatmentThe double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Glasdegib PK Parameters in the Randomized CohortCycle 1, Day 15The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in CohortWeek 24MRI (CT scan may have been permitted if MRI was contraindicated) of the spleen and the liver was performed at baseline, then every 12 weeks while the participant was on treatment. The same method of assessment used at baseline was used for the duration of the trial to ensure consistency. Spleen volume was assessed by a central, independent blinded reader.
Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized CohortBaseline up to Week 131An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized CohortBaseline up to Week 131Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to Maximum Severity: Randomized CohortBaseline up to Week 131AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Randomized CohortBaseline up to Week 131Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN greater than (\>)1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\* ULN,uric acid \>1.2\* ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Randomized CohortBaseline up to Week 131Anemia g1:\< LLN to 10 g/dL, g2:\<10 to 8g/dL, g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count (g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3: \<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin(g1:increase in hemoglobin level\>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2: increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g3:increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Randomized CohortBaseline up to Week 131ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN, g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN);Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500,g4:\>500mg/dL); bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN); hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55, g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30, g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L); hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3,g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L); hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8,g4:\>8mg/dL); hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL);hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9, g3:\<0.9-0.7,g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3-2, g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2,g3:\<2-1,g4:\<1mg/dL).
Psychometric Validation of the MPN-SAD in the Randomised CohortBaseline to end of treatmentThe double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in CohortWeek 24The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in CohortWeeks 12, 24, 36 and 48The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in CohortBaseline to end of treatmentAnemia response was defined as transfusion-independent participants with a ≥20 gram per liter (g/L) increase in hemoglobin (Hb) level where baseline Hb level was \<100 g/L, or baseline transfusion-dependent patients becoming transfusion-independent post-baseline. Transfusion dependency before the start of study treatment was defined as transfusions of ≥6 units of packed red blood cells in the 12 weeks prior to start of study treatment, for a final pre-treatment Hb of \<85 g/L. In addition, the most recent transfusion episode must have occurred in the 28 days prior to study enrollment. Response in transfusion-dependent patients required absence of any packed red blood cell transfusions during any consecutive rolling 12-week interval during the treatment phase, capped by a Hb level of ≥85 g/L.
Maximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in CohortCycle 1, Day 15Cmax was the highest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cmin was the lowest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cavg was the average concentration at steady state estimated using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis.
Area Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in CohortCycle 1, Day 15AUCtau was the area under the glasdegib plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) estimated by non-compartmental PK analysis using the linear/log trapezoidal method.
Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in CohortCycle 1, Day 15Tmax was the time of the first occurrence of Cmax observed directly from the plasma concentration data.

Countries

Japan, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

In this study, 2 cohorts were involved lead-in and randomized cohort. Lead-in cohort was followed by randomized cohort. Though the drug was considered safe and tolerable in Myelofibrosis, but a key secondary efficacy outcome measure was not met. Therefore, continuation into the randomized cohort did not proceed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Glasdegib Lead-in
Glasdegib administered orally at a daily starting dose of 100 mg on a continuous regimen of 28-day cycles.
21
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event6
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyOther5
Overall StudyParticipant refused further follow-up4
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGlasdegib Lead-in
Age, Continuous69.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN greater than (\>)1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN \>1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\*ULN,uric acid \>1.2\*ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: All participants treated in the lead-in portion of the study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort21 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN,g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN,g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500, g4:\>500mg/dL);bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN);hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55,g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30,g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L);hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3, g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L);hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8, g4:\>8mg/dL);hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL); hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9,g3:\<0.9-0.7, g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3 2,g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2, g3:\<2-1, g4:\<1mg/dL).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: All participants treated in the lead-in portion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in CohortGrade 35 Participants
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Lead-in CohortGrade 41 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in Cohort

Anemia (grade \[g\]1:\< LLN to 10 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\],g2:\<10 to 8g/dL,g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/millimeter\[mm\]\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (Absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count(g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin (g1:increase in hemoglobin level \>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2:increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN,g3: increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: All participants treated in the lead-in portion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in CohortGrade 33 Participants
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03 Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Lead-in CohortGrade 42 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in Cohort

AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability; congenital anomaly.Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death. Only categories with at least 1 participant with event were reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: All participants treated in the lead-in portion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in CohortGrade 3 or 414 Participants
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03: Lead-in CohortGrade 51 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: All participants treated in the lead-in portion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in CohortAEs21 Participants
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in CohortSAEs5 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in Cohort

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (up to Week 131) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse event.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: All participants treated in the lead-in portion of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in CohortSAEs5 Participants
Glasdegib Lead-inNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Lead-in CohortAEs19 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Spleen Volume Reduction (SVR) ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)/Computed Tomography (CT) Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS included all participants in the randomized Phase 2 component of the study who were randomized with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization.

Secondary

Area Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort

AUCtau was the area under the glasdegib plasma concentration-time profile from time zero to the end of the dosing interval (24 hours) estimated by non-compartmental PK analysis using the linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

Population: PK Parameter Analysis Population

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Glasdegib Lead-inArea Under the Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Profile at the End of a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) in the Lead-in Cohort13150 ng·hr/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 50
Secondary

Glasdegib PK Parameters in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

Population: PK Parameter Analysis Population

Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

Population: FAS

Secondary

Maximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in Cohort

Cmax was the highest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cmin was the lowest plasma concentration of glasdegib observed directly from the plasma concentration data. Cavg was the average concentration at steady state estimated using non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

Population: PK Parameter Analysis Population - included all enrolled participants treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest and were dose compliant (at steady state for glasdegib ).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Glasdegib Lead-inMaximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in CohortCmax996.8 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45
Glasdegib Lead-inMaximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in CohortCmin191.9 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 68
Glasdegib Lead-inMaximum Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cmax), Minimum Glasdegib Plasma Concentration Observed Prior to the Next Dose (Cmin), and Average Observed Glasdegib Plasma Concentration (Cavg) in the Lead-in CohortCav548.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50
Secondary

Median Duration of SVR in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

Population: FAS

Secondary

Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in Cohort

The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

Population: Lead-in Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Glasdegib Lead-inMonthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in CohortMonthly mean change at Week 12-2.74 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.07
Glasdegib Lead-inMonthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in CohortMonthly mean change at Week 24-4.95 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
Glasdegib Lead-inMonthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in CohortMonthly mean change at Week 36-4.11 Score on a scale
Glasdegib Lead-inMonthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Total Symptom Score (TSS) in the Lead-in CohortMonthly mean change at Week 48-8.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.52
Secondary

Monthly Mean Change From Baseline in Overall TSS in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48

Population: FAS

Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

Abnormality: hematology: hemoglobin less than (\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelets \<0.5\*LLN \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN), white blood cell count(WBC) \<0.6\* LLN greater than (\>)1.5\* ULN,lymphocytes, total neutrophils\<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN, band Cells, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes \>1.2\*ULN, blast cells \>1.0\*ULN. Coagulation: activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin international ratio \>1.1\* ULN. Liver function: bilirubin \>1.5\*ULN, AST, ALT,lactate dehydrogenase,alkaline phosphatase \>3.0\*ULN, protein,albumin \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN. Renal:blood urea nitrogen,creatinine \>1.3\* ULN,uric acid \>1.2\* ULN.Electrolytes: sodium \<0.95\*LLN \>1.05\*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium \<0.9\* LLN \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate \<0.8\* LLN \>1.2\* ULN.Chemistry: glucose \<0.6\*LLN \>1.5\*ULN,creatine kinase \>2.0\*ULN, amylase,lipase \>1.5\*ULN.Urinalysis: protein, blood \>1.0\*ULN,red blood cells,WBC \>=20,epithelial cells \>=6,casts,granular casts,hyaline \>1,cellular casts,crystals\>=1,bacteria \>20.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled as the study was terminated early so, no data were collected to assess this outcome measure.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Chemistry Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

ALT/AST g1:\>ULN 3\*ULN, g2:\>3-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN); Alkaline Phosphatase (g1:\>ULN 2.5\*ULN, g2:\>2.5-5\*ULN, g3:\>5 20\*ULN, g4:\>20\*ULN);Creatinine (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 6\*ULN, g4:\>6\*ULN);hyperglycemia (g1:\>ULN-160,g2:\>160 250, g3:\>250 500,g4:\>500mg/dL); bilirubin(total) (g1:\>ULN-1.5\*ULN, g2:\>1.5-3\*ULN, g3:\>3 10\*ULN,g4:\>10\*ULN); hypoglycaemia (g1:\<LLN-55, g2:\<55-40, g3:\<40 30, g4:\<30mg/dL); hyperkalemia (g1:\>ULN-5.5,g2:\>5.5-6, g3:\>6 7,g4:\>7mmol/L); hypokalemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<LLN-3,g3:\<3 2.5, g4:\<2.5mmol/L); hypermagnesemia (g1:\>ULN-3,g3:\>3 8,g4:\>8mg/dL); hypocalcemia (g1:\<LLN-8,g2:\<8-7, g3:\<7-6, g4:\<6mg/dL); hypercalcemia (g1:\>ULN-11.5,g2:\>11.5-12.5, g3:\>12.5-13.5, g4:\>13.5mg/dL);hypomagnesemia (g1:\<LLN-1.2,g2:\<1.2-0.9, g3:\<0.9-0.7,g4:\<0.7mg/dL); hyponatremia (g1:\<LLN-130,g3:\<130-120, g4:\<120mmol/L);hypoalbuminemia (g1:\<LLN-3,g2:\<3-2, g3:\<2, g4:lifethreatening);hypophosphatemia (g1:\<LLN-2.5,g2:\<2.5-2,g3:\<2-1,g4:\<1mg/dL).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled as the study was terminated early so, no data were collected to assess this outcome measure.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities By Maximum Severity: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (Version 4.0) Grade 3 and Above Hematological Test Abnormalities: Randomized Cohort

Anemia g1:\< LLN to 10 g/dL, g2:\<10 to 8g/dL, g3:\<8g/dL, g4:lifethreatening); platelet (g1:\<LLN to 75\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<75\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 50\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3:\<50\*10\^3/mm\^3 to 25\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<25\*10\^3/mm\^3); lymphopenia (g1:\<LLN to 8\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<8\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<5\*10\^2 to 2\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<2\*10\^2/mm\^3);neutrophil (absolute) (g1:\<LLN to 15\*10\^2/mm\^3, g2:\<15\*10\^2 to 10\*10\^2/mm\^3, g3:\<10\*10\^2 to 5\*10\^2/mm\^3, g4:\<5\*10\^2/mm\^3); white blood cell count (g1:\<LLN to 3\*10\^3/mm\^3, g2:\<3\*10\^3 to 2\*10\^3/mm\^3, g3: \<2\*10\^3 to 1\*10\^3/mm\^3, g4:\<1\*10\^3/mm\^3); hemoglobin(g1:increase in hemoglobin level\>0 to 2 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g2: increase in hemoglobin level\>2 to 4g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN, g3:increase in hemoglobin level\>4 g/dL above ULN or above baseline if baseline is above ULN).

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled as the study was terminated early so, no data were collected to assess this outcome measure.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) According to Maximum Severity: Randomized Cohort

AE was untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AE were assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE Version 4.03.Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; within normal limits. Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5=death.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled as the study was terminated early so, no data were collected to assess this outcome measure.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment -Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled as the study was terminated early so, no data were collected to assess this outcome measure.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Treatment -Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Randomized Cohort

Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 131

Population: The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled as the study was terminated early so, no data were collected to assess this outcome measure.

Secondary

Participant Reported Outcomes of Health Related Quality of Life and Health Status in the Randomised Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

Population: FAS

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort

The MPN-SAD assessed the impact of 9 myelofibrosis symptoms, at their worst, over the past 7 days and over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 9 symptoms are early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, night sweats, pruritus, bone pain, pain below the ribs on the left-hand side, fatigue and shortness of breath. The TSS is the sum of the individual scores, excluding inactivity and shortness of breath. The TSS at Week 24 is the average of the daily total scores from the last 28 days of symptom scores immediately prior to Week 24. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Lead-in Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Glasdegib Lead-inPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SAD) at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort4.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in Cohort

Anemia response was defined as transfusion-independent participants with a ≥20 gram per liter (g/L) increase in hemoglobin (Hb) level where baseline Hb level was \<100 g/L, or baseline transfusion-dependent patients becoming transfusion-independent post-baseline. Transfusion dependency before the start of study treatment was defined as transfusions of ≥6 units of packed red blood cells in the 12 weeks prior to start of study treatment, for a final pre-treatment Hb of \<85 g/L. In addition, the most recent transfusion episode must have occurred in the 28 days prior to study enrollment. Response in transfusion-dependent patients required absence of any packed red blood cell transfusions during any consecutive rolling 12-week interval during the treatment phase, capped by a Hb level of ≥85 g/L.

Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

Population: Lead-in Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Glasdegib Lead-inPercentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in CohortTransfusion independent ≥20 g/L Hb increase5.9 Percentage of participants
Glasdegib Lead-inPercentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Lead-in CohortTransfusion dependent0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Anemia Response (Transfusion Dependent Versus Independent) in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

Population: FAS

Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort

MRI (CT scan may have been permitted if MRI was contraindicated) of the spleen and the liver was performed at baseline, then every 12 weeks while the participant was on treatment. The same method of assessment used at baseline was used for the duration of the trial to ensure consistency. Spleen volume was assessed by a central, independent blinded reader.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Lead-in Analysis Set - included all participants treated in the lead-in portion of the study. Only participants who remained on treatment at Week 24 underwent MRI/CT scan.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Glasdegib Lead-inPercentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥35% as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Computed Tomography Scan at Week 24 in the Lead-in Cohort0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving SVR ≥50% as Measured by MRI/CT Scan at Week 24 in the Randomized Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: FAS

Secondary

Psychometric Validation of the MPN-SAD in the Randomised Cohort

The double blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase of the study was not enrolled after the study was terminated early so no data were collected to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment

Population: FAS

Secondary

Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort

Tmax was the time of the first occurrence of Cmax observed directly from the plasma concentration data.

Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 15

Population: PK Parameter Analysis Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Glasdegib Lead-inTime to Reach Cmax (Tmax) in the Lead-in Cohort1.02 Hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026