Skip to content

Diet as a Potential Treatment for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Low Osmolar Diet and Adjusted Water Intake for Vasopressin Suppression in ADPKD

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02225860
Enrollment
34
Registered
2014-08-26
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2017-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD)

Keywords

ADPKD, Copeptin, Vasopressin, Diet, Water

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn if dietary habits can affect vasopressin secretion in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Vasopressin increases the growth of kidney cysts and accelerates disease progression. Understanding how to control secretion of this hormone based on dietary habits may help to develop treatments to control this disease. The study will include about 60 patients from Tufts Medical Center. The study will last for 2 weeks. Blood and urine tests will be done 3 times during the study period. Subjects will be randomly assigned (by chance like flipping a coin), to one of two study groups. Group 1 will be given instructions to adjust their diet. This will include adjusting the amount of water, protein, and salt intake. Group 2 will have no adjustment of diet or water. The project has tremendous public health relevance, given the large numbers of people affected by autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and the substantial impact of the disease on morbidity, mortality, hospitalizations,dialysis or transplant, and societal costs of caring for those patients.

Detailed description

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease with an estimated 600,000 persons affected in the United States and 12.5 million persons worldwide. To date, no disease-modifying treatment has been approved for the treatment of ADPKD. Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is a key player in cyst enlargement and disease progression. It has been established that patients with ADPKD have higher levels of AVP as compared to healthy controls. Suppression, blockade or elimination of AVP slows cyst progression. AVP-V2 receptor inhibition controls disease progression in both animal models and humans, as does genetic elimination of vasopressin in the Polycystic Kidney (PCK) rat. This evidence indicates that AVP could be a promising target for therapeutic intervention. Unfortunately, the only clinically tested medication that blocks the AVP-V2 receptor (Tolvaptan) is associated with side effects including hypernatremia, hyperuricemia and elevated liver enzymes. An ideal therapeutic approach to target AVP in patients with ADPKD would be safe, easy to administer and could be adopted early in the disease process to prevent permanent kidney damage. High fluid intake presents one such possible treatment, and has been shown to suppress plasma levels of AVP, and slow cyst progression in an animal model of polycystic kidney disease. However, adherence to a high fluid intake diet is difficult to maintain in clinical practice. To address this adherence challenge, The investigators have developed a stepwise approach of combining a low osmolar diet (low protein and salt) with adjusted water intake, with the goal of lowering the amount of water intake needed to suppress AVP secretion. The major objective of this proposal is to evaluate whether this intervention can suppress vasopressin secretion in patients with early ADPKD. Vasopressin suppression will be assessed by measuring copeptin levels, which have been shown to be a reliable surrogate marker for the circulating AVP concentration. The rationale for this proposal is based on the fact that part of the difficulty in sustaining a low AVP level with daily water ingestion is the consumption of a diet that generates a large number of osmoles; high osmolar load stimulates vasopressin secretion to maintain water homeostasis. Hence, combining a low osmolar diet with adjusted water intake might prove to be sufficient to suppress vasopressin secretion in the clinical setting. The investigators propose the following: Specific Aim: To conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a low osmolar diet and high water intake intervention on vasopressin secretion, urine osmolality, and daily solute excretion in adult patients with ADPKD. The investigators hypothesize that a low osmolar diet combined with adjusted water intake will decrease serum copeptin level and total daily solute excretion in patients with ADPKD as compared to the control arm. To accomplish the research goals, the current proposal builds upon existing expertise at Tufts Medical Center in conducting controlled clinical trials in patients with ADPKD. The expected outcomes include the identification of a relevant, safe, easily tolerated and affordable intervention that can suppress vasopressin secretion in ADPKD patients early in the disease process; the proposed stepwise approach of combining a low osmolar diet and adjusted water intake carries the premise of lowering the amount of water needed to suppress AVP secretion and potentially slow the progression of this devastating disorder. The study long-term goal is to evaluate whether this therapeutic approach could be tolerated by patients over a longer period of time, and could impact clinical outcome measures such as kidney volume and kidney function progression.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDiet and water adjustment

The dietary intervention consisted of three elements: low sodium (1500 mg/day), low protein (daily protein dietary allowance of 0.8 gram/kg body weight), and low urea (avoidance of preservatives, food additives, bulking agents, and chewing gum). Protein was factored by measured body weight to mirror the estimated average requirement (EAR) of healthy adults which is set on a grams per kilogram basis

Sponsors

Tufts Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 to 60 years of age, who have ADPKD with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 60 ml/min/1.73m2 or above

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients on chronic use of medications known to affect AVP secretion (Serotonin Specific Reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), Opioids, Tricyclic Antidepressants (TCA) and Tolvaptan) 2. History of diseases influencing renal concentration capacity, such as, diabetes insipidus, adrenal or thyroid deficiencies, present or prior use of lithium, or kidney diseases other than ADPKD. 3. Baseline hyponatremia (Na below 135 mEq/l) 4. Inability to comply with dietary or fluid requirements 5. Have physical or cognitive impairments which prevent participation 6. Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean Serum Copeptin From Baseline (a Reflection of Endogenous Vasopressin Production) at Week 2Baseline to week 2The copeptin level will reflect the combined effect of low osmolar diet and adjusted water intake at week 2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Total Daily Urinary Solutes From Baseline to Week 2Baseline to week 2Total daily urinary solutes (this will serve as a surrogate for diet adherence and is known to be associated with lower vasopressin secretion). Total daily solutes is the total amount of osmoles detected in 24 hours urine collection.
Change in Mean Serum Copeptin Level From Baseline to Week 1baseline to week 1Mean serum copeptin level at week one which will reflect the effect of low osmolar diet alone.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Diet and Water Adjustment
Reduction in dietary salt and protein intake Diet and water adjustment
17
Control
Continue with usual diet
17
Total34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDiet and Water AdjustmentControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants17 Participants34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants17 participants34 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 17

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Mean Serum Copeptin From Baseline (a Reflection of Endogenous Vasopressin Production) at Week 2

The copeptin level will reflect the combined effect of low osmolar diet and adjusted water intake at week 2

Time frame: Baseline to week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diet and Water AdjustmentChange in Mean Serum Copeptin From Baseline (a Reflection of Endogenous Vasopressin Production) at Week 2-0.86 pmole/LStandard Deviation 1.3
ControlChange in Mean Serum Copeptin From Baseline (a Reflection of Endogenous Vasopressin Production) at Week 20.39 pmole/LStandard Deviation 1.2
Comparison: The analysis of the primary and secondary outcome was based on an intention to treat principle. Copeptin was measured in each subject at baseline and week 2 and the change from baseline to end point (delta) was calculated for all subjects. The delta copeptin between subjects in the intervention and control arms was compared with a two sample t test for independent groups. One sample t-tests of the delta were used to examine whether there was any change over time for each group separately.p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Mean Serum Copeptin Level From Baseline to Week 1

Mean serum copeptin level at week one which will reflect the effect of low osmolar diet alone.

Time frame: baseline to week 1

Population: At week 1, there was a nonsignificant (t-test) increase in plasma copeptin to 7.1 ±5.6 in the low osmolar diet group and to 6.1 ±5.5 in the control group. The change in mean plasma copeptin level between baseline and week1 was not statistically significant between groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diet and Water AdjustmentChange in Mean Serum Copeptin Level From Baseline to Week 10.9 pmol/LStandard Deviation 1.2
ControlChange in Mean Serum Copeptin Level From Baseline to Week 11.4 pmol/LStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Change in Total Daily Urinary Solutes From Baseline to Week 2

Total daily urinary solutes (this will serve as a surrogate for diet adherence and is known to be associated with lower vasopressin secretion). Total daily solutes is the total amount of osmoles detected in 24 hours urine collection.

Time frame: Baseline to week 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Diet and Water AdjustmentChange in Total Daily Urinary Solutes From Baseline to Week 2-120 mOsm/DayStandard Deviation 212
ControlChange in Total Daily Urinary Solutes From Baseline to Week 227 mOsm/DayStandard Deviation 79
Comparison: The analysis of the primary and secondary outcome was based on an intention to treat principle. Copeptin was measured in each subject at baseline and week 2 and the change from baseline to end point (delta) was calculated for all subjects. The delta copeptin between subjects in the intervention and control arms was compared with a two sample t test for independent groups. One sample t-tests of the delta were used to examine whether there was any change over time for each group separately.p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026