Skip to content

MOMENTUM 3 IDE Clinical Study Protocol

Thoratec Corporation MOMENTUM 3, Multi-center Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing MCS Therapy With HeartMate 3™ IDE Clinical Study Protocol

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02224755
Acronym
HM3™
Enrollment
1028
Registered
2014-08-25
Start date
2014-09-02
Completion date
2019-03-26
Last updated
2022-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Refractory Left Ventricular Heart Failure

Keywords

Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Assist Device, Ventricular Dysfunction, Cardiomyopathy, Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Disease, Heart-assist devices, Thoratec Corporation

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HM3 LVAS by demonstrating non-inferiority to the HMII LVAS (HMII) when used for the treatment of advanced, refractory, left ventricular heart failure.

Detailed description

The HM3 LVAS is intended to provide hemodynamic support in patients with advanced, refractory left ventricular heart failure; either for short term support, such as a bridge to cardiac transplantation (BTT) or myocardial recovery, or as long term support, such as destination therapy (DT). The HM3 is intended for use inside or outside the hospital.

Interventions

Implantation of HeartMate 3 LVAD to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HeartMate 3 LVAS by demonstrating non-inferiority to the HMII LVAS (HMII) when used for the treatment of advanced, refractory, left ventricular heart failure

DEVICEHeartMate II LVAS

Implantation of the commercially approved HeartMate II LVAD which is the standard treatment for advanced heart failure

Sponsors

Thoratec Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject or legal representative has signed Informed Consent Form (ICF) 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. BSA ≥ 1.2 m2 4. NYHA Class III with dyspnea upon mild physical activity, or NYHA Class IV 5. LVEF ≤ 25% 6. a) Inotrope dependent OR b) CI \< 2.2 L/min/m2, while not on inotropes and subjects must also meet one of the following: * On Optimal Medical Management (OMM), based on current heart failure practice guidelines for at least 45 out of the last 60 days and are failing to respond * Advanced Heart Failure for at least 14 days AND dependent on intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) for at least 7 days 7. Females of child bearing age must agree to use adequate contraception

Exclusion criteria

1. Etiology of heart failure (HF) due to or associated with uncorrected thyroid disease, obstructive cardiomyopathy, pericardial disease, amyloidosis or restrictive cardiomyopathy 2. Technical obstacles which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator 3. Existence of ongoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) other than IABP 4. Positive pregnancy test if of childbearing potential 5. Presence of mechanical aortic valve that will not be either converted to a bioprosthesis or oversewn at the time of LVAD implant 6. History of any organ transplant 7. Platelet count \< 100,000 x 103/L (\< 100,000/ml) 8. Psychiatric disease/disorder, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair compliance with the study protocol and LVAS management 9. History of confirmed, untreated AAA \> 5 cm in diameter within 6 months of enrollment 10. Presence of an active, uncontrolled infection 11. Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other peri/post-operative therapy the investigator will require based upon the patients' health status 12. Presence of any one of the following risk factors for indications of severe end organ dysfunction or failure: 1. An INR ≥ 2.0 not due to anticoagulation therapy 2. Total bilirubin \> 43 umol/L (2.5 mg/dl), shock liver, or biopsy proven liver cirrhosis 3. History of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) defined by FEV1/FVC \< 0.7, and FEV1 \<50% predicted 4. Fixed pulmonary hypertension with a most recent PVR ≥ 8 Wood units that is unresponsive to pharmacologic intervention 5. History of stroke within 90 days prior to enrollment, or a history of cerebrovascular disease with significant (\> 80%) uncorrected carotid stenosis 6. Serum creatinine ≥ 221 umol/L (2.5 mg/dl) or the need for chronic renal replacement therapy 7. Significant peripheral vascular disease (PVD) accompanied by rest pain or extremity ulceration 13. Patient has moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction during pump implant 14. Pre albumin \< 150 mg/L (15mg/dL) or Albumin \< 30g/L (3 g/dL) (if only one available) ; pre albumin \< 150 mg/L (15mg/dL) and Albumin \< 30g/L (3 g/dL) (if both available) 15. Planned Bi-VAD support prior to enrollment 16. Patient has known hypo or hyper coagulable states such as disseminated intravascular coagulation and heparin induced thrombocytopenia 17. Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect the study 18. Any condition other than HF that could limit survival to less than 24 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Term Primary End PointThe first 294 randomized Subjects will be followed for 6 months or to outcome (transplant, explant, or death), whichever occurs first.Survival at 6 months free of disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score \> 3) or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device
Long Term Primary End PointThe first 366 randomized Subjects will be followed for 24 months or to outcome (transplant, explant, or death), whichever occurs first.Survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score \> 3) or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue ScaleBaseline to 24 monthsQuality of life as measured by the visual analogue scale from the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. The patient rates their current state of health with the visual analogue scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary ScoreBaseline to 24 monthsQuality of Life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and fewer heart failure symptoms.
Six Minute Walk TestBaseline to 24 monthsFunctional status as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test. The Six Minute Walk Test measures the distance a patient is able to walk during 6 minutes without running or jogging.
Powered Secondary End Point: Pump Replacement at Two YearsAs they occur up to 24 months or to Outcome, whichever occurs firstIn addition to powering the study on the primary endpoints for PMA approval, the study will pre-specify a powered secondary endpoint to evaluate incidence of pump replacements at 24 months. HeartMate II is the control.
RehospitalizationsFrom initial discharge to two years post-implantRate of all cause rehospitalization
Adverse Event RatesTwo years post-implantEvents-per-patient-year (EPPY) for anticipated adverse events as defined in the study protocol
New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationBaseline to 24 monthsFunctional status as measured by NYHA classification. NYHA class categorizes patients by the severity of their heart failure symptoms. As the class increases, the degree of symptoms is more severe indicating worse functional status. Class I indicates no limitation of physical activity. Class II indicates slight limitation of physical activity. Class IIIA indicates marked limitation of physical activity where less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina pain. Class IIIB indicates marked limitation of physical activity where mild physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina pain. Class IV indicates inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total ScoreBaseline to 24 monthsQuality of Life as measured by EuroQoL 5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) total score. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has patients rate their quality of life across 5 categories of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scores from the 5 dimensions are summed for the total score which ranges from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating more problems and a worse quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited at 69 study sites in the United States from 2014 to 2016.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)
Patients randomized to HeartMate II LVAS (control device)
512
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)
Patients randomized to HeartMate 3 LVAS
516
Total1,028

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Randomization to Device ImplantWithdrawn prior to implant71
Two Year Follow up Post-implantDeath10398
Two Year Follow up Post-implantDevice explant or permanent deactivation33
Two Year Follow up Post-implantHeart transplant137119
Two Year Follow up Post-implantWithdrawn post-implant156

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Total
Age, Continuous60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
History of Atrial Fibrillation238 Participants215 Participants453 Participants
History of Stroke56 Participants50 Participants106 Participants
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator382 Participants352 Participants734 Participants
Inotropes423 Participants445 Participants868 Participants
Intended Goal of Support
Bridge to candidacy for transplantation
81 Participants86 Participants167 Participants
Intended Goal of Support
Bridge to transplantation
121 Participants113 Participants234 Participants
Intended Goal of Support
Destination therapy
310 Participants317 Participants627 Participants
INTERMACS profile
1
18 Participants11 Participants29 Participants
INTERMACS profile
2
146 Participants156 Participants302 Participants
INTERMACS profile
3
251 Participants272 Participants523 Participants
INTERMACS profile
4
82 Participants67 Participants149 Participants
INTERMACS profile
5-7 or not provided
15 Participants10 Participants25 Participants
Intra-aortic balloon pump79 Participants64 Participants143 Participants
Ischemic Cause of Heart Failure240 Participants216 Participants456 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group
Asian
3 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group
Black
120 Participants145 Participants265 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group
Other
18 Participants21 Participants39 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race or ethnic group
White
367 Participants342 Participants709 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
93 Participants105 Participants198 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
419 Participants411 Participants830 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
103 / 50598 / 515
other
Total, other adverse events
235 / 505261 / 515
serious
Total, serious adverse events
466 / 505483 / 515

Outcome results

Primary

Long Term Primary End Point

Survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score \> 3) or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device

Time frame: The first 366 randomized Subjects will be followed for 24 months or to outcome (transplant, explant, or death), whichever occurs first.

Population: First 366 randomized Subjects

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Long Term Primary End Point106 Participants
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Long Term Primary End Point151 Participants
p-value: <0.001Farrington-Manning risk difference
Primary

Short Term Primary End Point

Survival at 6 months free of disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score \> 3) or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device

Time frame: The first 294 randomized Subjects will be followed for 6 months or to outcome (transplant, explant, or death), whichever occurs first.

Population: First 294 randomized Subjects

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Short Term Primary End Point109 Participants
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Short Term Primary End Point131 Participants
p-value: <0.001Farrington-Manning risk difference
Secondary

Adverse Event Rates

Events-per-patient-year (EPPY) for anticipated adverse events as defined in the study protocol

Time frame: Two years post-implant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesStroke0.18 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRight Heart Failure0.23 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesArterial Non-CNS Thromboembolism0.02 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesBleeding0.95 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesCardiac Arrhythmia0.45 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHepatic Dysfunction0.04 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHypertension0.08 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesMajor Infection0.82 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesMyocardial Infarction0.01 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHemorrhagic Stroke0.07 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesIschemic Stroke0.11 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesDebilitating Stroke0.07 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesOther Neurological Event0.08 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesPericardial Fluid Collection0.07 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesPsychiatric Episode0.07 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRenal Dysfunction0.08 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRespiratory Failure0.17 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRVAD0.03 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesVenous Thromboembolism0.04 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesWound Dehiscence0.02 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesSuspected Device Thrombosis0.12 events per patient year
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHemolysis0.01 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesDebilitating Stroke0.04 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesWound Dehiscence0.01 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesOther Neurological Event0.09 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesArterial Non-CNS Thromboembolism0.01 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRVAD0.03 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesBleeding0.61 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesPericardial Fluid Collection0.04 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesCardiac Arrhythmia0.37 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHemolysis0.01 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHepatic Dysfunction0.03 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesPsychiatric Episode0.08 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHypertension0.07 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesVenous Thromboembolism0.04 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesMajor Infection0.82 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRenal Dysfunction0.11 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesMyocardial Infarction0.01 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesStroke0.08 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesSuspected Device Thrombosis0.01 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesHemorrhagic Stroke0.03 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRespiratory Failure0.19 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesIschemic Stroke0.04 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Adverse Event RatesRight Heart Failure0.27 events per patient year
Secondary

EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score

Quality of Life as measured by EuroQoL 5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) total score. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire has patients rate their quality of life across 5 categories of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scores from the 5 dimensions are summed for the total score which ranges from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating more problems and a worse quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

Population: Analysis population only includes patients still ongoing on LVAD support at the specified time periods who completed the assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total ScoreBaseline11.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score6 months8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score24 months9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total ScoreBaseline11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score6 months8.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQoL 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) Total Score24 months8.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Secondary

EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale

Quality of life as measured by the visual analogue scale from the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. The patient rates their current state of health with the visual analogue scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

Population: Analysis population only includes patients still ongoing on LVAD support at the specified time periods who completed the assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue ScaleBaselline48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale6 months74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale24 months75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue ScaleBaselline50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale6 months76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale24 months76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Secondary

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score

Quality of Life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and fewer heart failure symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

Population: Analysis population only includes patients still ongoing on LVAD support at the specified time periods who completed the assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary ScoreBaseline40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score6 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score24 months68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary ScoreBaseline39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score6 months70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score24 months69 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Secondary

New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification

Functional status as measured by NYHA classification. NYHA class categorizes patients by the severity of their heart failure symptoms. As the class increases, the degree of symptoms is more severe indicating worse functional status. Class I indicates no limitation of physical activity. Class II indicates slight limitation of physical activity. Class IIIA indicates marked limitation of physical activity where less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina pain. Class IIIB indicates marked limitation of physical activity where mild physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or angina pain. Class IV indicates inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

Population: Analysis population only includes patients still ongoing on LVAD support at the specified time periods who completed the assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationClass I or II at Baseline0 Participants
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationClass I or II at 6 Months310 Participants
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationClass I or II at 24 Months176 Participants
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationClass I or II at Baseline0 Participants
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationClass I or II at 6 Months340 Participants
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)New York Heart Association (NYHA) ClassificationClass I or II at 24 Months219 Participants
Secondary

Powered Secondary End Point: Pump Replacement at Two Years

In addition to powering the study on the primary endpoints for PMA approval, the study will pre-specify a powered secondary endpoint to evaluate incidence of pump replacements at 24 months. HeartMate II is the control.

Time frame: As they occur up to 24 months or to Outcome, whichever occurs first

Population: All subjects who underwent implant with the assigned device

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Powered Secondary End Point: Pump Replacement at Two Years57 Participants
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Powered Secondary End Point: Pump Replacement at Two Years12 Participants
Comparison: Based on data in the Sponsor's device tracking database, 7% of patients with the HeartMate II LVAS receive a pump replacement by 24 months. The expected proportion of patients with the HeartMate 3 LVAS to receive a pump replacement by 24 months was assumed to be 3%. We estimated that to demonstrate superiority of HeartMate 3 to HeartMate II with a power of 80% and α = 0.05 (2-sided), a total of 1028 patients (514 per arm) were required using the Fisher's exact test.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.11, 0.38]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Rehospitalizations

Rate of all cause rehospitalization

Time frame: From initial discharge to two years post-implant

Population: Analysis population only includes Subjects who were discharged on LVAD support from the implant hospitalization

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Rehospitalizations2.47 events per patient year
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Rehospitalizations2.26 events per patient year
Secondary

Six Minute Walk Test

Functional status as measured by the Six Minute Walk Test. The Six Minute Walk Test measures the distance a patient is able to walk during 6 minutes without running or jogging.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

Population: Analysis population only includes patients still ongoing on LVAD support at the specified time periods who completed the assessment. Patients unable to walk due to heart failure symptoms were assigned a distance of zero.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Six Minute Walk TestBaseline129 metersStandard Deviation 156
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Six Minute Walk Test6 months327 metersStandard Deviation 136
HeartMate II (Intent-to-Treat)Six Minute Walk Test24 months361 metersStandard Deviation 337
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Six Minute Walk TestBaseline136 metersStandard Deviation 160
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Six Minute Walk Test6 months310 metersStandard Deviation 142
HeartMate 3 (Intent-to-Treat)Six Minute Walk Test24 months323 metersStandard Deviation 156

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026