Skip to content

A Comparative Evaluation of the Performance and Fit of Pediatric Face Masks

A Comparative Evaluation of the Performance and Fit of Pediatric Face Masks

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02224612
Enrollment
96
Registered
2014-08-25
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2019-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Pediatric Face Masks, children

Brief summary

Compare the fit of two pediatric face masks in children.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label comparative observational study to be conducted in up to two (2) facilities with the healthy and non-healthy Subjects (4-12 years of age). The usage of face masks is common practice within hospitals, and masks may be evaluated outside of clinical facilities as well.

Interventions

DEVICEMedline Pediatric Face Masks

Medline Face Masks, which are single use disposable masks were evaluated on children. The mask was worn for 2-3 minutes for EtCO2 and respiration assessments and physical fit assessment.

DEVICEKC Childs Mask

KC Childs Mask, which are single use disposable masks were evaluated on children. The mask was worn for 2-3 minutes for EtCO2 and respiration assessments and physical fit assessment.

Sponsors

Medline Industries
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 4 to 12 years of age * conscious

Exclusion criteria

* able to wear a mask * no previous allergic reactions to face masks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Carbon Dioxide LevelsBaseline and 2 minutesETCO2 will be assessed by a capnographer when wearing each pediatric face mask. Results are the difference between masks in change from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Fit of Pediatric Face Masks.ImmediatePhysical fit will be determined by a reviewer after the mask is put on. The fit will be based on a several fit parameters to compare the difference in the score between the two masks. The total fit score was calculated by summing the nose to chine coverage score (0 = No, 1=Yes) and gap score (0=No apparent gap, flush to face on one or both sides, 1=Slight gap, not flush to face but can see cheeks only, 2=Moderate gap, can see mouth. , 3=Large gap, mask loose fitting all around face (chin, sides, nose, etc.) to arrive a total score with 0 indicating best fit and 4 indicating worst fit.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Respiration RatesBaseline and 2 minutesChange from Baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Statistical analysis projected ninety-nine (99) Subjects were needed to assess mask equivalence, however only 96 subjects were enrolled at the facility.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Partipants
All subjects were randomized to all interventions -- Medline Pediatric Face Mask and KC Childs
96
Total96

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Partipants
Age, Customized
10-12 years
32 Participants
Age, Customized
4-5 years
19 Participants
Age, Customized
6-9 years
45 Participants
EtCO2
KC Mask
40.8 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
EtCO2
Medline Mask
40.7 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
96 participants
Respiration Rate
KC Mask
19.0 breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3
Respiration Rate
Medline Mask
19.3 breaths per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 960 / 96
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 960 / 96
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 960 / 96

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Carbon Dioxide Levels

ETCO2 will be assessed by a capnographer when wearing each pediatric face mask. Results are the difference between masks in change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and 2 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medline Pediatric Face MaskChange From Baseline in Carbon Dioxide Levels-0.07 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.56
KC Childs MaskChange From Baseline in Carbon Dioxide Levels-0.79 mmHgStandard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Physical Fit of Pediatric Face Masks.

Physical fit will be determined by a reviewer after the mask is put on. The fit will be based on a several fit parameters to compare the difference in the score between the two masks. The total fit score was calculated by summing the nose to chine coverage score (0 = No, 1=Yes) and gap score (0=No apparent gap, flush to face on one or both sides, 1=Slight gap, not flush to face but can see cheeks only, 2=Moderate gap, can see mouth. , 3=Large gap, mask loose fitting all around face (chin, sides, nose, etc.) to arrive a total score with 0 indicating best fit and 4 indicating worst fit.

Time frame: Immediate

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medline Pediatric Face MaskPhysical Fit of Pediatric Face Masks.Medline Mask.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Medline Pediatric Face MaskPhysical Fit of Pediatric Face Masks.KC Mask.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Respiration Rates

Change from Baseline

Time frame: Baseline and 2 minutes

Population: Respiration Rate

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Medline Pediatric Face MaskChange From Baseline in Respiration RatesMedline Mask-1.14 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 0.41
Medline Pediatric Face MaskChange From Baseline in Respiration RatesKC Mask-1.0 Breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026