Skip to content

An Open Label Extension Study of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P) in Children and Adults With Dravet or Lennox-Gastaut Syndromes

An Open Label Extension Study to Investigate the Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P; CBD) in Children and Adults With Inadequately Controlled Dravet or Lennox-Gastaut Syndromes.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02224573
Acronym
GWPCARE5
Enrollment
681
Registered
2014-08-25
Start date
2015-06-11
Completion date
2020-09-24
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy, Dravet Syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

Keywords

Cannabidiol, CBD, GWP42003-P, GWPCARE5

Brief summary

To investigate the potential antiepileptic effects of cannabidiol (GWP42003-P) in children and adults with Dravet or Lennox-Gastaut syndromes.

Detailed description

This is a multi-center, open-label extension study for participants with Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome who have previously participated in double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies of GWP42003-P (Core Studies: GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]). The first participant was enrolled into the open-label extension study after the Data Safety Monitoring Committee reviewed the safety data from Part A of study GWEP1332.

Interventions

Sponsors

GW Research Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: • Participant has completed the treatment phase of their Core Studies: GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Participant is currently using or has in the past used recreational or medicinal cannabis, or synthetic cannabinoid-based medications (including Sativex®) within the 3 months prior to study entry other than the investigational medicinal product (IMP) received during the Core Study and are unwilling to abstain for the duration for the study. * Any history of suicidal behavior or any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Visit 1. * Participant has been part of a clinical trial involving an IMP during the inter-study period. * Female participant is of child bearing potential or male participant's partner is of child bearing potential, unless willing to ensure that they or their partner use highly effective contraception, for example, hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices/hormone-releasing systems, bilateral tubal occlusion, vasectomized partner or sexual abstinence, during the study and for 3 months thereafter (however, a male condom should not be used in conjunction with a female condom). * Participant has significantly impaired hepatic function at the 'End of Treatment' visit of their Core Study or at Visit 1 if re-assessed: i) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); ii) ALT or AST \>3 × ULN and (total bilirubin \[TBL\] \>2 × ULN or international normalized ratio \[INR\] \>1.5); iii) ALT or AST \>3 × ULN with the presence of fatigue, nausea, vomiting, right upper quadrant pain or tenderness, fever, rash, and/or eosinophilia (\>5%). This criterion must be confirmed prior to entering the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment Groupup to Week 260TEAEs, defined as AEs that started, or worsened in severity or seriousness, following the first dose of investigational medicinal product in this study, are reported. Any AEs that continued from the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) were only classified as treatment emergent if they worsened in this study.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseup to Week 260Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. bpm = beats per minute; DBP = Diastolic Blood Pressure; mmHg = millimeters of mercury; SBP = Systolic Blood Pressure. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Body Mass Index (BMI)up to Week 260BMI is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseup to Week 260Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. msec = milliseconds; QTcB = corrected QT interval with Bazett's correction. The time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseup to Week 260The C-SSRS questionnaire is a brief, standardized measure that uniquely assesses the essential information (behavior, ideation, lethality, and severity) and distinguishes between suicidal occurrences and non-suicidal self-injury.
Mean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upup to Week 260The Cannabis Withdrawal Scale is a 19-item scale administered to participants (18 years and above), with each item (withdrawal symptom) measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (0 = Not at all; 5 = Moderately; 10 = Extremely). Total score, calculated as the sum of the 19 item sub-scores ranging from 0-190 are reported. Higher scores indicate more withdrawal symptoms and an increased negative impact to quality of life. The participant or participant's caregiver was asked to record the extent to which each withdrawal symptom was experienced in the last 24 hours and also to rate the negative impact on normal daily activities. L24S = Last 24 Hours Score; NIS = Negative Impact on Normal Daily Activity Score. The End of Treatment visit occurred after a maximum of 260 weeks of treatment. The End of Taper occurred up to 10 days after the End of Treatment visit. The Safety Call and Safety Follow-up occurred 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, after the End of Taper.
Mean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upup to Week 260The PCWS was administered to participants aged 4 to 17 (inclusive) that was developed from the 19-item validated CWS (adults) to assess mood, behavioral, and physical symptoms associated with cannabis. The total score, calculated as the sum of 10 items (rated on a 4-point scale: 0 = none; 1 = a little bit; 2 = quite a bit; 3 = a lot) ranging from 0-30 are reported. Higher scores indicate more withdrawal symptoms and an increased negative impact to quality of life. The End of Treatment visit occurred after a maximum of 260 weeks of treatment. The participant or participant's caregiver was asked to record the extent to which each withdrawal symptom was experienced in the last 24 hours and also to rate the negative impact on normal daily activities. The End of Taper occurred up to 10 days after the End of Treatment visit. The Safety Call and Safety Follow-up occurred 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, after the End of Taper.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Valuesup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hemoglobin Levelsup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hematocrit Valuesup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volumeup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobinup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophilsup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)up to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterolup to week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and Bilirubinup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine Clearance (Schwartz) and Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault)up to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. mL/min/1.73 m\^2 = millilitres per minute per 1.73 meters squared. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl Transferaseup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Albumin and Proteinup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prolactinup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin Timeup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratioup to Week 260Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Levelsup to Week 260IGF-1 levels in serum were analyzed as part of the clinical laboratory testing in participants. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (S/CGIC) ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260The S/CGIC allows participants and caregivers to rate the participant's overall condition on a scale of 1 to 7 (1 = Very Much Improved, and 7 = Very Much Worse). The combined caregiver and participant summary used either the caregiver or participant version if only one version was completed, or the caregiver version when both the caregiver and participant versions were completed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Percent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyBaseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, Week 253 to 264, and Last 12 WeeksTotal seizures included the sum of all seizures (tonic-clonic, tonic, atonic, clonic, myoclonic, countable partial, other partial, and absence seizures) recorded by the participant or caregiver. Change from Baseline was calculated as the percentage change from Baseline for each 12-week period. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.
Percent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Drop Seizure Frequency in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeBaseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, and Last 12 WeeksDrop seizures are defined as the subset of tonic-clonic, tonic, or atonic seizures. Change from Baseline was calculated as the percentage change from Baseline for each 12-week period. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. The outcome was reported for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome participants only. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.
Percent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet SyndromeBaseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, Week 253 to 264, and Last 12 WeeksConvulsive seizures are defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures. Change from Baseline was calculated as the percentage change from Baseline for each 12-week period. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. The outcome was reported for Dravet Syndrome participants only. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.
Number of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Baseline; At last 12 weeksStatus epilepticus is defined as any seizure lasting for 30 minutes or longer. The number of convulsive seizures greater than 30 minutes in duration and the number of non-convulsive seizures greater than 30 minutes in duration were collected weekly. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. mins = minutes. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Matrix Reasoning T ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WPPSI-IV Matrix Reasoning T Score was used to measure abstract reasoning. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of abstract reasoning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in abstract reasoning. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT) Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test-4th edition was used to test vocabulary. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 0-83; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate a higher level of language performance. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in language performance. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) ScoresBaseline; up to Week 260The QOLCE is a parent-reported questionnaire that evaluates health-related QOL in children aged 2-18 years old. It contains 76 items with 16 subscales covering 7 domains (physical activities, social activities, cognition, emotional well-being, behavior, general health, and general QOL). All items in the questionnaire are rated on a 5-point or 6-point categorical scale. Based on the responses to the items in each domain, scores for 16 subscales are derived. Score range from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate highest level of functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study is defined as the Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Visual Perception Standard Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260Visual Perception Standard scale was used to measure visual motor functioning. The raw score i.e., the sum of the correct responses was measured on a 6-standard score range. Score range of 70-79 indicated low, 80-89 indicated below average, 90-109 indicated average, 110-119 indicated above average, 120-129 indicated high, and \>129 indicated very high visual motor functioning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in visual motor functioning. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in a Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY)-2 Word Generation Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY)-2 Word Generation Scale was used to measure verbal fluency. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was converted to a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of verbal fluency. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in verbal fluency. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment QOL in Epilepsy Scores (QOLIE-31-P) in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeBaseline; up to Week 260The QOLIE-31-P is a survey of health-related QOL for adults with epilepsy. It is comprised of 38 questions about health daily activities and evaluates how much distress the participant feels about problems and worries related to epilepsy. The questionnaire consists of 7 subscales (energy, mood, daily activities, cognition, medication effects, seizure worry, and overall QOL). Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better QOL. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. The outcome was reported for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome participants only.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresBaseline; up to Week 260The Vineland-II is an individually administered instrument for assessing adaptive behaviors. It consists of 4 adaptive behavior domains (1 = low; 5 = high) and a maladaptive behavior domain (1 = clinically significant; 3 = average), and an overall Adaptive Behavior Composite Score. Standard scores (population mean = 100, SD = 15, range = 20 to 160) are produced for the domain and composite scores, and scaled scores (called v-scale scores, with a population mean = 15, SD = 3, range = 1 to 24) are produced for the subscale scores. Higher scores indicate better functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Number of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 48, 104, 156, 208, and End of Treatment (up to Week 260 based on when the participant discontinued treatment)Inpatient hospitalizations due to epilepsy were recorded by the investigator. The timing of the End of Treatment varied per participant based on when the participant discontinued IMP.
Number of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresBaseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, Week 253 to 264, and Last 12 WeeksTotal seizures included the sum of all seizures (tonic-clonic, tonic, atonic, clonic, myoclonic, countable partial, other partial, and absence seizures) recorded by the participant or caregiver.
Number of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Up to Week 260The SGICSD and CGICSD are comprised of the following questions rated on a 3-point scale for each seizure type. The CGICSD score is used to assess the average duration of the participant's seizures (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment) and the SGICSD score is used to assess the average duration of seizures (comparing condition now to condition before treatment). Scores range from 1 to 3 (1 = Decrease in average duration; 3 = Increase in average duration).
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Coding Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WAIS Coding Scale was used to measure processing speed. The raw score i.e., sum of correct substitutions was measured in the range of 0-16. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Visual Scanning Completion Time Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260D-KEFS Visual Scanning Completion Time Scale was used to measure visual attention and processing speed. The cognitive assessment battery items are age-specific, used to measure a variety of functions for both children and adults. The items were administered by an experienced psychometrician to a sub-group of sites that had the expertise to conduct the test. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the visual scanning trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to convert into a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in cognitive function.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number Sequencing Completion Time Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260D-KEFS Number Sequencing Completion Time Scale was used to measure processing speed. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the number sequencing trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to convert into a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Letter Sequencing Completion Time Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260D-KEFS Letter Sequencing Completion Time Scaled was used to measure processing speed. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the letter sequencing trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number-letter Switching Completion Time Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260D-KEFS Number-letter Switching Completion Time Scale was used to measure cognitive flexibility, task-set switching, and general executive functioning. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the number-letter switching trial was measured in the range of 0-240; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in cognitive function. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Motor Speed Completion Time Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260D-KEFS Motor Speed Completion Time Scale was used to measure motor speed. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the motor speed trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better motor speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Both Hands Z Score)Baseline; up to Week 260Purdue Pegboard test was used to measure fine motor dexterity of both hands. The raw score was calculated as the total number of pegs in 30 seconds; higher scores indicated higher level of motor dexterity. The raw score was converted to a Z-score ranging from 0-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of motor dexterity. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as Z-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor dexterity. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Dominant Hand Z Score)Baseline; up to Week 260Purdue Pegboard test was used to measure fine motor dexterity of the dominant hand. The raw score was calculated as the total number of pegs in 30 seconds; higher scores indicated higher level of motor dexterity. The raw score was converted to a Z-score ranging from 0-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of motor dexterity. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as Z-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor dexterity. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Non Dominant Hand Z Score)Baseline; up to Week 260Purdue Pegboard test was used to measure fine motor dexterity of the non dominant hand. The raw score was calculated as the total number of pegs in 30 seconds; higher scores indicated higher level of motor dexterity. The raw score was converted to a Z-score ranging from 0-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of motor dexterity. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as Z-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor dexterity. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WAIS Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 0-16. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WAIS Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 0-16. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 2-8. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 2-8. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)-II Vocabulary T ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WAIS-II Vocabulary T Score was used to estimate general intellectual ability based on fund of information and verbal intelligence. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80 using the WASI assessment manual; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of intelligence. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in intelligence. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WASI-II Matrix Reasoning T ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WASI-II Matrix Reasoning T Score was used to estimate general intellectual ability based abstract reasoning. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80 using the WASI assessment manual; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of abstract reasoning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in abstract reasoning. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Coding Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WISC Coding Scale was used to measure processing speed in children aged 6-16 years 11 months, with scores ranging from 0 to 119. Higher scores indicate better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WISC Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 0-18; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WISC Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 0-18; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WISC Longest Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 2-8; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WISC Longest Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 2-10; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Preschool & Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)-IV Bug Search T ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WPPSI-IV Bug Search T Score was used to measure processing speed and complex attention. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of attention. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in attention. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.
Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Receptive Vocabulary T ScoreBaseline; up to Week 260WPPSI-IV Receptive Vocabulary T Score was used to measure fund of information. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of intelligence. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in intelligence. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants who completed the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P (Core Studies: GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) were eligible for enrollment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dravet Syndrome
Participants with Dravet Syndrome who completed double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies of GWP42003-P (Core Studies: GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], and GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\]) were titrated up to 10 to 20 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) GWP42003-P using a recommended titration schedule during the Titration Period. Participants continued at this dose during the Maintenance Period. The maximum dose participants could receive was 30 mg/kg/day.
315
Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
Participants with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome who completed double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies of GWP42003-P (Core Studies: GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\] and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) were titrated up to 10 to 20 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) GWP42003-P using a recommended titration schedule during the Titration Period. Participants continued at this dose during the Maintenance Period. The maximum dose participants could receive was 30 mg/kg/day.
366
Total681

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Taper PhaseAdverse Event11
Taper PhaseCompleted Incorrect Number of Taper Days10
Taper PhaseHospitalization/Dose Reduction10
Taper PhaseWithdrawn by participants or parent/guardian03
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event2638
Treatment PhaseBegan Commercial Product10
Treatment PhaseCaregiver Asked to Stop Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP)01
Treatment PhaseContinued Compassionate Use10
Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy158
Treatment PhaseLack of Efficacy per Participant/Caregiver33
Treatment PhaseLack of Efficiency21
Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up21
Treatment PhaseMet Withdrawal Criteria57
Treatment PhaseParticipant Did Not Return for Visits01
Treatment PhaseParticipant Discontinued IMP01
Treatment PhaseParticipant Moved20
Treatment PhaseParticipant with Protocol-Excluded Treatment01
Treatment PhasePlaced in Group Home01
Treatment PhasePursued Other Trials10
Treatment PhaseRefused Medication11
Treatment PhaseStarted on Other IMP10
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Participant or Parent/Guardian6248
Treatment PhaseWithdrawn by the Investigator2311

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDravet SyndromeTotalLennox-Gastaut Syndrome
Age, Continuous9.737 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4434
13.053 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.212
15.906 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5392
Age, Customized
Adolescents (12-17 years)
90 Participants179 Participants89 Participants
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 years)
9 Participants129 Participants120 Participants
Age, Customized
Children (2-11 years)
216 Participants373 Participants157 Participants
Race
American Indian/Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
Anglo-Indian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
Arab
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race
Asian
6 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Race
Biracial
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race
Black/African American
10 Participants25 Participants15 Participants
Race
Caucasian and African American
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race
Caucasian/Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race
Eurasian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
Hispanic/Caucasian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race
Indian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race
Latino
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Race
Mulatto
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
North African
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
Not Applicable (As per country-specific data protection law.
15 Participants16 Participants1 Participants
Race
South American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
Unknown
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race
White and Black Caribbean
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
White/Caucasian
269 Participants594 Participants325 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants16 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants25 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
29 Participants45 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
269 Participants594 Participants325 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
159 Participants327 Participants168 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
156 Participants354 Participants198 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
6 / 31512 / 366
other
Total, other adverse events
292 / 315338 / 366
serious
Total, serious adverse events
133 / 315157 / 366

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-up

The Cannabis Withdrawal Scale is a 19-item scale administered to participants (18 years and above), with each item (withdrawal symptom) measured on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (0 = Not at all; 5 = Moderately; 10 = Extremely). Total score, calculated as the sum of the 19 item sub-scores ranging from 0-190 are reported. Higher scores indicate more withdrawal symptoms and an increased negative impact to quality of life. The participant or participant's caregiver was asked to record the extent to which each withdrawal symptom was experienced in the last 24 hours and also to rate the negative impact on normal daily activities. L24S = Last 24 Hours Score; NIS = Negative Impact on Normal Daily Activity Score. The End of Treatment visit occurred after a maximum of 260 weeks of treatment. The End of Taper occurred up to 10 days after the End of Treatment visit. The Safety Call and Safety Follow-up occurred 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, after the End of Taper.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants (18 years and above) with available Cannabis Withdrawal Scale score were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upL24S, End of Taper9.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.64
Dravet SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upL24S, Post-Taper Safety Call3.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.72
Dravet SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upL24S, Safety Follow-Up2.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Dravet SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upNIS, End of Taper9.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.03
Dravet SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upNIS, Post-Taper Safety Call16.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.79
Dravet SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upNIS, Safety Follow-Up5.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.24
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upNIS, Post-Taper Safety Call1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upL24S, End of Taper4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upNIS, End of Taper5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.96
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upL24S, Post-Taper Safety Call0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upNIS, Safety Follow-Up1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.82
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Cannabis Withdrawal Scale Score at End of Taper (EOT), the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upL24S, Safety Follow-Up4.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.27
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Albumin and Protein

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Albumin and ProteinAlbumin-0.2 grams (g)/LStandard Deviation 3.43
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Albumin and ProteinProtein-1.2 grams (g)/LStandard Deviation 5.83
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Albumin and ProteinAlbumin-0.9 grams (g)/LStandard Deviation 3.31
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Albumin and ProteinProtein-2.0 grams (g)/LStandard Deviation 5.75
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlkaline phosphatase-40.9 Units/LStandard Deviation 88.18
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAspartate aminotransferase4.0 Units/LStandard Deviation 26.14
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlanine aminotransferase7.0 Units/LStandard Deviation 39.24
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseGamma glutamyl transferase8.7 Units/LStandard Deviation 42.35
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseGamma glutamyl transferase4.9 Units/LStandard Deviation 45.65
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlkaline phosphatase-40.1 Units/LStandard Deviation 73.62
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAlanine aminotransferase9.5 Units/LStandard Deviation 43.96
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Gamma Glutamyl TransferaseAspartate aminotransferase2.8 Units/LStandard Deviation 26.62
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Body Mass Index (BMI)

BMI is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Body Mass Index (BMI)0.42 kilograms per meters squared (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 2.701
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Body Mass Index (BMI)0.05 kilograms per meters squared (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 5.863
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine Clearance (Schwartz) and Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault)

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. mL/min/1.73 m\^2 = millilitres per minute per 1.73 meters squared. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine Clearance (Schwartz) and Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault)Creatinine Clearance, Schwartz,0.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 4.41
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine Clearance (Schwartz) and Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault)Creatinine Clearance, Cockcroft-Gault0.0 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine Clearance (Schwartz) and Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault)Creatinine Clearance, Schwartz,0.0 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine Clearance (Schwartz) and Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault)Creatinine Clearance, Cockcroft-Gault-0.6 mL/min/1.73 m^2Standard Deviation 5.94
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and Bilirubin

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and BilirubinCreatinine, Jaffe7.0 micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 9.32
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and BilirubinCreatinine, enzymatic3.8 micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 8.83
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and BilirubinBilirubin0.48 micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.339
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and BilirubinCreatinine, Jaffe7.1 micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 10.86
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and BilirubinCreatinine, enzymatic4.0 micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 9.44
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Creatinine (Jaffe), Creatinine (Enzymatic), and BilirubinBilirubin0.45 micromoles per Liter (µmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.626
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin0.10 picograms (pg)Standard Deviation 1.482
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin-0.15 picograms (pg)Standard Deviation 1.926
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume-1.0 femtoliters (fL)Standard Deviation 5.1
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume-1.3 femtoliters (fL)Standard Deviation 5.01
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hematocrit Values

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hematocrit Values-0.0105 percentage of RBCs in whole blood (L/L)Standard Deviation 0.02938
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hematocrit Values-0.0110 percentage of RBCs in whole blood (L/L)Standard Deviation 0.02983
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hemoglobin Levels

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hemoglobin Levels-1.6 grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 9.08
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Hemoglobin Levels-2.4 grams per Liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 11.14
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Levels

IGF-1 levels in serum were analyzed as part of the clinical laboratory testing in participants. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Levels-0.28 nanomoles (nmol)/LStandard Deviation 12.701
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) Levels1.10 nanomoles (nmol)/LStandard Deviation 15.97
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsBasophils0.00 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.041
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsLymphocytes-0.31 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.988
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsWhite blood cells-0.52 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.531
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsMonocytes-0.05 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.276
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsEosinophils-0.02 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.159
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsNeutrophils-0.16 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.041
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsPlatelets5.4 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 64.84
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsNeutrophils0.05 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 1.878
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsPlatelets5.0 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 70.47
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsWhite blood cells-0.09 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 2.052
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsBasophils0.01 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.04
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsEosinophils-0.02 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.165
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsLymphocytes-0.14 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.778
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Platelets, White Blood Cells, Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and NeutrophilsMonocytes0.01 10^9 cells/LStandard Deviation 0.245
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prolactin

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prolactin0.43 µInternational Units/millilitre (µIU/mL)Standard Deviation 132.613
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prolactin10.43 µInternational Units/millilitre (µIU/mL)Standard Deviation 230.439
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio-0.012 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0784
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio-0.010 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0736
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin Time

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin Time-0.08 secondsStandard Deviation 0.74
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Prothrombin Time-0.09 secondsStandard Deviation 0.706
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Values

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Values-0.068 10^12 cells per Liter (L)Standard Deviation 0.3297
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Red Blood Cells (RBCs) Values-0.059 10^12 cells per Liter (L)Standard Deviation 0.3424
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolSodium-0.4 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.25
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolPotassium-0.06 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.372
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolBlood urea nitrogen-0.08 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.571
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolGlucose-0.06 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.026
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolCalcium-0.050 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.1148
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolHDL cholesterol0.06 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.372
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolCalcium-0.054 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.1218
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolSodium-0.8 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.7
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolGlucose0.06 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.288
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolPotassium-0.08 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.407
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolHDL cholesterol0.12 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.32
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Sodium, Potassium, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Glucose, Calcium, and High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) CholesterolBlood urea nitrogen0.00 millimoles per Liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 1.555
Primary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Eosinophils/WBCs-0.10 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 2.064
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Monocytes/WBCs-0.05 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 3.125
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Lymphocytes/WBCs-1.32 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 12.396
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Neutrophils/WBCs1.47 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 12.982
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Basophils/WBCs0.08 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 0.284
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Neutrophils/WBCs1.27 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 12.245
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Basophils/WBCs0.12 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 0.287
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Eosinophils/WBCs-0.24 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 2.104
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Lymphocytes/WBCs-1.32 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 11.193
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in the Percentage of Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils in White Blood Cells (WBCs)Monocytes/WBCs0.18 percentage in WBCsStandard Deviation 2.6
Primary

Mean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-up

The PCWS was administered to participants aged 4 to 17 (inclusive) that was developed from the 19-item validated CWS (adults) to assess mood, behavioral, and physical symptoms associated with cannabis. The total score, calculated as the sum of 10 items (rated on a 4-point scale: 0 = none; 1 = a little bit; 2 = quite a bit; 3 = a lot) ranging from 0-30 are reported. Higher scores indicate more withdrawal symptoms and an increased negative impact to quality of life. The End of Treatment visit occurred after a maximum of 260 weeks of treatment. The participant or participant's caregiver was asked to record the extent to which each withdrawal symptom was experienced in the last 24 hours and also to rate the negative impact on normal daily activities. The End of Taper occurred up to 10 days after the End of Treatment visit. The Safety Call and Safety Follow-up occurred 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, after the End of Taper.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants (4 to 17 years) with available Pediatric Cannabis Withdrawal Scale score were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upEnd of Treatment4.0 scores on a scale
Dravet SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upEnd of Taper2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.77
Dravet SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upPost-Taper Safety Call2.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Dravet SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upSafety Follow-Up1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upSafety Follow-Up1.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upEnd of Treatment6.0 scores on a scale
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upPost-Taper Safety Call2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Pediatric Cannabinoid Withdrawal Scale (PCWS) Score at the End of Treatment, the End of Taper, the Post-Taper Safety Call, and at Safety Follow-upEnd of Taper2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Primary

Mean Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (S/CGIC) Score

The S/CGIC allows participants and caregivers to rate the participant's overall condition on a scale of 1 to 7 (1 = Very Much Improved, and 7 = Very Much Worse). The combined caregiver and participant summary used either the caregiver or participant version if only one version was completed, or the caregiver version when both the caregiver and participant versions were completed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only those participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (S/CGIC) Score3.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (S/CGIC) Score2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment Group

TEAEs, defined as AEs that started, or worsened in severity or seriousness, following the first dose of investigational medicinal product in this study, are reported. Any AEs that continued from the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) were only classified as treatment emergent if they worsened in this study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupContusion15 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupEar infection35 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupWeight decreased21 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupDiarrhoea135 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAlanine aminotransferase increased37 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupInfluenza37 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAspartate aminotransferase increased38 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupFatigue39 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupGamma-glutamyltransferase increased32 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupUrinary tract infection19 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupDecreased appetite99 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupConstipation20 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupConvulsion79 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPharyngitis streptococcal26 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupSomnolence87 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupUpper respiratory tract infection78 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupStatus epilepticus47 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupGastroenteritis viral15 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupLethargy21 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupTotal participants affected by any TEAE306 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupHeadache18 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupOtitis media21 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupSedation16 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupNasopharyngitis78 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupDrooling11 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupBronchitis15 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAbnormal behaviour34 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupNausea16 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupInsomnia16 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupViral upper respiratory tract infection11 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupIrritability26 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupSinusitis38 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAggression20 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupGastroenteritis16 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAgitation9 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupVomiting63 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupCough42 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupFall22 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupNasal congestion13 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPneumonia35 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupLaceration8 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPneumonia aspiration4 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPyrexia124 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupHypoxia2 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupRhinorrhoea20 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupHypoxia21 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupTotal participants affected by any TEAE353 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupDiarrhoea140 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupVomiting107 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupConstipation43 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupNausea32 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPyrexia126 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupFatigue38 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupUpper respiratory tract infection104 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupNasopharyngitis58 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupSinusitis49 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPneumonia51 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupEar infection50 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupInfluenza45 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupUrinary tract infection51 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPharyngitis streptococcal27 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupGastroenteritis viral30 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupOtitis media22 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupBronchitis23 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupViral upper respiratory tract infection20 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupGastroenteritis7 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupFall23 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupLaceration35 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupContusion25 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupWeight decreased61 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAlanine aminotransferase increased30 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAspartate aminotransferase increased19 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupGamma-glutamyltransferase increased20 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupDecreased appetite93 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupConvulsion141 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupSomnolence107 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupStatus epilepticus42 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupLethargy34 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupHeadache26 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupSedation27 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupDrooling21 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAbnormal behaviour23 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupInsomnia40 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupIrritability29 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAggression30 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupAgitation19 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupCough63 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupNasal congestion46 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupRhinorrhoea19 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Occurring in ≥5% of Participants in Any Treatment GroupPneumonia aspiration22 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-dose

Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. bpm = beats per minute; DBP = Diastolic Blood Pressure; mmHg = millimeters of mercury; SBP = Systolic Blood Pressure. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting SBP < -20 mmHg59 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting SBP > 20 mmHg96 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting DBP < -10 mmHg139 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting DBP > 10 mmHg166 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-dosePulse Rate < -15 bpm176 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-dosePulse Rate > 15 bpm150 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseWeight ≤ -7 %47 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseWeight ≥ 7%213 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseWeight ≥ 7%223 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting SBP < -20 mmHg88 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-dosePulse Rate < -15 bpm192 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting SBP > 20 mmHg120 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseWeight ≤ -7 %106 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting DBP < -10 mmHg176 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-dosePulse Rate > 15 bpm179 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in the Indicated Vital Sign Values From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study at Any Time Post-doseSitting DBP > 10 mmHg191 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-dose

Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. msec = milliseconds; QTcB = corrected QT interval with Bazett's correction. The time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 450 msec, Baseline13 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 450 msec, any time post-dose62 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 480 msec, Baseline2 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 480 msec, any time post-dose10 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 500 msec, Baseline2 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 500 msec, any time post-dose7 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 500 msec, Baseline2 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 450 msec, Baseline21 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 480 msec, any time post-dose40 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 450 msec, any time post-dose120 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 500 msec, any time post-dose20 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values at the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study and at Any Time Post-doseQTcB > 480 msec, Baseline4 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)

Status epilepticus is defined as any seizure lasting for 30 minutes or longer. The number of convulsive seizures greater than 30 minutes in duration and the number of non-convulsive seizures greater than 30 minutes in duration were collected weekly. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. mins = minutes. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.

Time frame: Baseline; At last 12 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data are analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; Yes14 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; Yes21 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; No277 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; Yes14 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; No270 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; Yes13 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; No276 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; No277 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; No352 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; Yes14 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; Yes7 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; No352 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; No356 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; Yes17 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Over the 4-week Baseline; No349 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Convulsive and Non-convulsive Seizures Greater Than 30 Minutes in Duration (Status Epilepticus)Non-Convulsive SE: Last 12 Weeks; Yes11 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-dose

The C-SSRS questionnaire is a brief, standardized measure that uniquely assesses the essential information (behavior, ideation, lethality, and severity) and distinguishes between suicidal occurrences and non-suicidal self-injury.

Time frame: up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal ideation, Day 10 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal behavior, Day 11 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseAny suicidality, any time post-dose1 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal behavior, any time post-dose1 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal ideation, any time post-dose1 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseComplete suicidality, any time post-dose0 participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseAny suicidality, Day 11 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseComplete suicidality, any time post-dose0 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseAny suicidality, Day 11 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseAny suicidality, any time post-dose2 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal ideation, Day 11 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal ideation, any time post-dose2 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal behavior, Day 10 participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Questions Regarding Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Using the Children's Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Day 1 and at Any Time Post-doseSuicidal behavior, any time post-dose0 participants
Primary

Percent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet Syndrome

Convulsive seizures are defined as tonic-clonic, tonic, clonic, or atonic seizures. Change from Baseline was calculated as the percentage change from Baseline for each 12-week period. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. The outcome was reported for Dravet Syndrome participants only. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, Week 253 to 264, and Last 12 Weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet SyndromeWeek 49 to 60-52.9 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet SyndromeWeek 97 to 108-64.3 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet SyndromeWeek 145 to 156-69.4 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet SyndromeWeek 205 to 216-72.3 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet SyndromeWeek 253 to 264-55.6 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Participants With Dravet SyndromeLast 12 weeks-40.0 percentage change
Primary

Percent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Drop Seizure Frequency in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

Drop seizures are defined as the subset of tonic-clonic, tonic, or atonic seizures. Change from Baseline was calculated as the percentage change from Baseline for each 12-week period. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. Data for change from Baseline at pre-randomization of the Core Study are presented; however, the time frame represents the duration for which participants were enrolled in GWEP1415. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. The outcome was reported for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome participants only. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, and Last 12 Weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Drop Seizure Frequency in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeWeek 49 to 60-59.4 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Drop Seizure Frequency in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeWeek 97 to 108-69.4 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Drop Seizure Frequency in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeWeek 145 to 156-70.8 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Drop Seizure Frequency in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeWeek 205 to 216-68.7 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Drop Seizure Frequency in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeLast 12 weeks-59.4 percentage change
Primary

Percent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure Frequency

Total seizures included the sum of all seizures (tonic-clonic, tonic, atonic, clonic, myoclonic, countable partial, other partial, and absence seizures) recorded by the participant or caregiver. Change from Baseline was calculated as the percentage change from Baseline for each 12-week period. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study (GWEP1332A \[NCT02091206\], GWEP1332B \[NCT02091375\], GWEP1424 \[NCT02224703\], GWEP1414 \[NCT02224560\], and GWEP1423 \[NCT02224690\]) is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. Last 12 weeks is equal to the last 12 weeks' data for each participant irrespective of time in study.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, Week 253 to 264, and Last 12 Weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 205 to 216-81.5 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 145 to 156-79.8 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 253 to 264-70.0 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyLast 12 weeks-55.2 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 49 to 60-65.8 percentage change
Dravet SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 97 to 108-71.3 percentage change
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyLast 12 weeks-51.9 percentage change
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 49 to 60-58.9 percentage change
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 97 to 108-66.4 percentage change
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 145 to 156-65.3 percentage change
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromePercent Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Total Seizure FrequencyWeek 205 to 216-78.4 percentage change
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in a Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY)-2 Word Generation Scaled Score

Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY)-2 Word Generation Scale was used to measure verbal fluency. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was converted to a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of verbal fluency. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in verbal fluency. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in a Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY)-2 Word Generation Scaled Score-1.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.414
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in a Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment (NEPSY)-2 Word Generation Scaled Score3.39 Score on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Visual Scanning Completion Time Scaled Score

D-KEFS Visual Scanning Completion Time Scale was used to measure visual attention and processing speed. The cognitive assessment battery items are age-specific, used to measure a variety of functions for both children and adults. The items were administered by an experienced psychometrician to a sub-group of sites that had the expertise to conduct the test. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the visual scanning trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to convert into a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in cognitive function.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Visual Scanning Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Visual Scanning Completion Time Scaled Score-0.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.577
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Letter Sequencing Completion Time Scaled Score

D-KEFS Letter Sequencing Completion Time Scaled was used to measure processing speed. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the letter sequencing trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Letter Sequencing Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Letter Sequencing Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Motor Speed Completion Time Scaled Score

D-KEFS Motor Speed Completion Time Scale was used to measure motor speed. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the motor speed trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better motor speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Motor Speed Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Motor Speed Completion Time Scaled Score-1.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.309
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number-letter Switching Completion Time Scaled Score

D-KEFS Number-letter Switching Completion Time Scale was used to measure cognitive flexibility, task-set switching, and general executive functioning. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the number-letter switching trial was measured in the range of 0-240; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in cognitive function. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number-letter Switching Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number-letter Switching Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number Sequencing Completion Time Scaled Score

D-KEFS Number Sequencing Completion Time Scale was used to measure processing speed. The raw score i.e., total time in seconds for completing the number sequencing trial was measured in the range of 0-150; higher scores indicated worse functioning. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to convert into a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number Sequencing Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in D-KEFS Number Sequencing Completion Time Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT) Scaled Score

Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test-4th edition was used to test vocabulary. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 0-83; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate a higher level of language performance. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in language performance. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT) Scaled Score-31.00 T scoreStandard Deviation 56.569
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (EOWPVT) Scaled Score-31.00 T scoreStandard Deviation 53.74
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Both Hands Z Score)

Purdue Pegboard test was used to measure fine motor dexterity of both hands. The raw score was calculated as the total number of pegs in 30 seconds; higher scores indicated higher level of motor dexterity. The raw score was converted to a Z-score ranging from 0-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of motor dexterity. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as Z-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor dexterity. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Both Hands Z Score)1.26 Z ScoreStandard Deviation 3.272
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Both Hands Z Score)9.55 Z ScoreStandard Deviation 21.07
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Dominant Hand Z Score)

Purdue Pegboard test was used to measure fine motor dexterity of the dominant hand. The raw score was calculated as the total number of pegs in 30 seconds; higher scores indicated higher level of motor dexterity. The raw score was converted to a Z-score ranging from 0-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of motor dexterity. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as Z-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor dexterity. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Dominant Hand Z Score)1.16 Z ScoreStandard Deviation 3.192
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Dominant Hand Z Score)9.23 Z ScoreStandard Deviation 18.083
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Non Dominant Hand Z Score)

Purdue Pegboard test was used to measure fine motor dexterity of the non dominant hand. The raw score was calculated as the total number of pegs in 30 seconds; higher scores indicated higher level of motor dexterity. The raw score was converted to a Z-score ranging from 0-19; higher scores indicate a higher level of motor dexterity. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as Z-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in motor dexterity. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Non Dominant Hand Z Score)1.31 Z ScoreStandard Deviation 3.329
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Purdue Pegboard Fine Motor Speed (Non Dominant Hand Z Score)10.21 Z ScoreStandard Deviation 21.852
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) Scores

The QOLCE is a parent-reported questionnaire that evaluates health-related QOL in children aged 2-18 years old. It contains 76 items with 16 subscales covering 7 domains (physical activities, social activities, cognition, emotional well-being, behavior, general health, and general QOL). All items in the questionnaire are rated on a 5-point or 6-point categorical scale. Based on the responses to the items in each domain, scores for 16 subscales are derived. Score range from 0 to 100. Higher score indicate highest level of functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study is defined as the Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) Scores3.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.61
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) Scores6.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.87
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) Scores

The Vineland-II is an individually administered instrument for assessing adaptive behaviors. It consists of 4 adaptive behavior domains (1 = low; 5 = high) and a maladaptive behavior domain (1 = clinically significant; 3 = average), and an overall Adaptive Behavior Composite Score. Standard scores (population mean = 100, SD = 15, range = 20 to 160) are produced for the domain and composite scores, and scaled scores (called v-scale scores, with a population mean = 15, SD = 3, range = 1 to 24) are produced for the subscale scores. Higher scores indicate better functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only those participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills: Domestic Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization: Coping Skills Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication Domain Standard Score-3.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.75
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization Domain Standard Score-3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.38
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills: Community Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMotor Skills: Gross Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication: Written Subdomain v-Scale Score-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMotor Skills: Fine Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills Domain Standard Score-5.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.68
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMotor Skills Domain Standard Score-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.62
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills: Personal Subdomain v-Scale Score-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresAdaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score-3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.09
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization: Interpersonal Relationships Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMaladaptive Behavior Index: Internalizing Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication: Expressive Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMaladaptive Behavior Index: Externalizing Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization: Play and Leisure Time Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMaladaptive Behavior Index v-Scale Score-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication: Receptive Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMaladaptive Behavior Index v-Scale Score-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication: Receptive Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication: Expressive Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication: Written Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresCommunication Domain Standard Score-1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills: Personal Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills: Domestic Subdomain v-Scale Score-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills: Community Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresDaily Living Skills Domain Standard Score-3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization: Interpersonal Relationships Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization: Play and Leisure Time Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization: Coping Skills Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresSocialization Domain Standard Score-3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.29
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMotor Skills: Gross Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMotor Skills: Fine Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMotor Skills Domain Standard Score-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.23
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresAdaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score-2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.07
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMaladaptive Behavior Index: Internalizing Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, Second Edition (Vineland-II) ScoresMaladaptive Behavior Index: Externalizing Subdomain v-Scale Score-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Visual Perception Standard Scaled Score

Visual Perception Standard scale was used to measure visual motor functioning. The raw score i.e., the sum of the correct responses was measured on a 6-standard score range. Score range of 70-79 indicated low, 80-89 indicated below average, 90-109 indicated average, 110-119 indicated above average, 120-129 indicated high, and \>129 indicated very high visual motor functioning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in visual motor functioning. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Visual Perception Standard Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scale
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Visual Perception Standard Scaled Score2.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.767
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Backward Scaled Score

WAIS Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 0-16. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.0 Score on a scale
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreWeek 480.0 Score on a scale
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreWeek 480.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreEnd of Treatment-0.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.378
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Forward Scaled Score

WAIS Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 0-16. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.0 Score on a scale
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreWeek 480.0 Score on a scale
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.808
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreWeek 48-0.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.258
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreEnd of Treatment0.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.268
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled Score

WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 2-8. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.00 Score on a scale
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreWeek 480.00 Score on a scale
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreWeek 480.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled ScoreEnd of Treatment0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled Score

WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured in the range of 2-8. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.0 Score on a scale
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreWeek 480.0 Score on a scale
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreBaseline0.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.642
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreWeek 480.25 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.258
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WAIS Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled ScoreEnd of Treatment-0.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.574
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WASI-II Matrix Reasoning T Score

WASI-II Matrix Reasoning T Score was used to estimate general intellectual ability based abstract reasoning. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80 using the WASI assessment manual; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of abstract reasoning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in abstract reasoning. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WASI-II Matrix Reasoning T Score-1.50 T ScoreStandard Deviation 3
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WASI-II Matrix Reasoning T Score-3.29 T ScoreStandard Deviation 5.376
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)-II Vocabulary T Score

WAIS-II Vocabulary T Score was used to estimate general intellectual ability based on fund of information and verbal intelligence. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80 using the WASI assessment manual; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of intelligence. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in intelligence. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)-II Vocabulary T Score0.00 T ScoreStandard Deviation 0
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)-II Vocabulary T Score-4.00 T ScoreStandard Deviation 12.247
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Coding Scaled Score

WAIS Coding Scale was used to measure processing speed. The raw score i.e., sum of correct substitutions was measured in the range of 0-16. The raw score was normed with a referenced score to calculate a scaled score (i.e., score on a scale) ranging from 1-19; higher scores indicated better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Coding Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Coding Scaled Score

WISC Coding Scale was used to measure processing speed in children aged 6-16 years 11 months, with scores ranging from 0 to 119. Higher scores indicate better processing speed. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in processing speed. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) Coding Scaled Score-0.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.817
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Preschool & Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)-IV Bug Search T Score

WPPSI-IV Bug Search T Score was used to measure processing speed and complex attention. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of attention. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in attention. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Preschool & Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)-IV Bug Search T ScoreBaseline0.0 T ScoreStandard Deviation 0
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in Wechsler Preschool & Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)-IV Bug Search T ScoreWeek 480.0 T Score
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Digit Span Backward Scaled Score

WISC Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 0-18; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Digit Span Backward Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.632
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Digit Span Forward Scaled Score

WISC Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 0-18; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Digit Span Forward Scaled Score0.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.787
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled Score

WISC Longest Digit Span Backward Scale was used to measure working memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 2-8; higher scores indicated better working memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in working memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Longest Digit Span Backward Scaled Score0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.265
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled Score

WISC Longest Digit Span Forward Scale was used to measure auditory memory. The raw score i.e., sum of correct trials was measured on a scale of 2-10; higher scores indicated better auditory memory. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as score on a scale. Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in auditory memory. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WISC Longest Digit Span Forward Scaled Score0.17 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.408
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Matrix Reasoning T Score

WPPSI-IV Matrix Reasoning T Score was used to measure abstract reasoning. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of abstract reasoning. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in abstract reasoning. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Matrix Reasoning T ScoreWeek 48-0.75 T ScoreStandard Deviation 6.994
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Matrix Reasoning T ScoreBaseline0.75 T ScoreStandard Deviation 6.994
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Matrix Reasoning T ScoreBaseline-19.0 T Score
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Receptive Vocabulary T Score

WPPSI-IV Receptive Vocabulary T Score was used to measure fund of information. The raw score i.e., the sum of correct responses was measured on a scale of 1-19 and converted to a T-score ranging from 20-80; T-scores are standard scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of intelligence. Change from the pre-randomization Baseline of the core study to the End of Treatment are reported as as T-score (i.e., score on a scale). Negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement in intelligence. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: ITT Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment in WPPSI-IV Receptive Vocabulary T Score-1.00 T Score
Secondary

Mean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment QOL in Epilepsy Scores (QOLIE-31-P) in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

The QOLIE-31-P is a survey of health-related QOL for adults with epilepsy. It is comprised of 38 questions about health daily activities and evaluates how much distress the participant feels about problems and worries related to epilepsy. The questionnaire consists of 7 subscales (energy, mood, daily activities, cognition, medication effects, seizure worry, and overall QOL). Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better QOL. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study is defined as Baseline of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies with GWP42003-P. The only data presented from the Core Studies in this report are the comparison of the Extension Study data with the Baseline data at pre-randomization of the Core Study. The outcome was reported for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome participants only.

Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dravet SyndromeMean Change From the Pre-randomization Baseline of the Core Study to the End of Treatment QOL in Epilepsy Scores (QOLIE-31-P) in Participants With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.33
Secondary

Number of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)

The SGICSD and CGICSD are comprised of the following questions rated on a 3-point scale for each seizure type. The CGICSD score is used to assess the average duration of the participant's seizures (comparing their condition now to their condition before treatment) and the SGICSD score is used to assess the average duration of seizures (comparing condition now to condition before treatment). Scores range from 1 to 3 (1 = Decrease in average duration; 3 = Increase in average duration).

Time frame: Up to Week 260

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data are analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic-Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration89 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic-Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration17 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration39 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration8 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration41 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration4 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Atonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration26 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Atonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration6 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Myoclonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration48 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Myoclonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration14 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Countable Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration34 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Countable Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration8 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Other Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration25 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Other Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration6 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Absence Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration42 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Absence Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration9 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Absence Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration3 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic-Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration101 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Myoclonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration72 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic-Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration24 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Other Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration29 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration132 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Myoclonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration4 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Tonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration18 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Absence Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration83 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration38 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Countable Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration41 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Clonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration3 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Other Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration0 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Atonic Seizures; End of TreatmentDecrease in average duration98 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Countable Partial Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration5 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Changes in the Average Duration of Seizure Subtypes as Assessed by the Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change in Seizure Duration (S/CGICSD)Atonic Seizures; End of TreatmentIncrease in average duration10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous Visit

Inpatient hospitalizations due to epilepsy were recorded by the investigator. The timing of the End of Treatment varied per participant based on when the participant discontinued IMP.

Time frame: Week 48, 104, 156, 208, and End of Treatment (up to Week 260 based on when the participant discontinued treatment)

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 485 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 1563 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitEnd of Treatment16 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 2080 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 1044 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitEnd of Treatment17 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 489 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 1049 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 1560 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Participants With Inpatient Hospitalizations Due to Epilepsy Since the Previous VisitWeek 2080 Participants
Secondary

Number of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total Seizures

Total seizures included the sum of all seizures (tonic-clonic, tonic, atonic, clonic, myoclonic, countable partial, other partial, and absence seizures) recorded by the participant or caregiver.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 49 to 60, Week 97 to 108, Week 145 to 156, Week 205 to 216, Week 253 to 264, and Last 12 Weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 205 to 2167 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 145 to 15648 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 253 to 2642 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresLast 12 Weeks153 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 49 to 60108 Participants
Dravet SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 97 to 10873 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresLast 12 Weeks188 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 49 to 60169 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 97 to 108148 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 145 to 156128 Participants
Lennox-Gastaut SyndromeNumber of Treatment Responders With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Total SeizuresWeek 205 to 21612 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026