Skip to content

Trial of an Online Multimedia Program to Boost Coping & Function for Prostate Cancer Survivors (PROGRESS)

Randomized Clinical Trial of an Online Multimedia Program to Boost Coping & Function for Prostate Cancer Survivors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02224482
Acronym
PROGRESS
Enrollment
431
Registered
2014-08-25
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2021-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test how well an online program designed to help prostate cancer survivors cope with changes caused by their cancer or treatment works compared to standard print educational materials from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Detailed description

This study involves the development and evaluation of a comprehensive and innovative multimedia program designed to facilitate the post-treatment transition into survivorship. The design of the intervention, the PRostate Cancer Online Guide and Resources for Electronic Survivorship Service (PROGRESS), is theoretically based on the team's Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing Model. PROGRESS focuses on promoting adaptive coping within four key post-treatment domains: 1) Physical Dysfunction (e.g., physical symptoms); 2) Emotional Well- Being (e.g., fear of recurrence); 3) Interpersonal Concerns (e.g., sexual intimacy issues); and 4) Practical Barriers (e.g., medical follow-up challenges). Content for these domains are organized in a virtual resource center and will consist of: 1) provision of related information through text, graphics, voice overs, and animation; 2) videos of health care experts answering frequently asked questions; 3) videos of prostate cancer survivors describing their experiences and modeling competencies and coping strategies; and 4) skills training to improve communication between prostate cancer survivors and family and healthcare providers. Program content has been developed through literature and evidence-based content review, expert input, and input from multi-ethnic survivor focus groups. To ensure adequate and appropriate program content and optimal functionality, an iterative process of review, revision, and user and usability testing has been employed. Intervention efficacy will be evaluated through a two-arm, prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 600 patients (200 from Fox Chase Cancer Center, 200 from the Cancer Institute of New Jersey, and 200 from Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) will complete the study. Data will be collected at baseline, and at 1-, 3- and 6- months follow-up. The primary outcome variable will be use of adaptive coping, and secondary outcome variables will include use of maladaptive coping, disease-specific quality of life, vitality/energy, physical quality of life, cancer-related intrusive thoughts, emotional quality of life, fear of recurrence, bother from physical dysfunctions, satisfaction with communication in medical interactions, satisfaction with cancer-related with family/friends, marital problems, and practical concerns . A theory-based test of mediators of intervention effects (i.e., self-efficacy for the survivorship phase, confidence in ability to manage symptoms related to prostate cancer, perceived information utility), and moderators (i.e., demographics, comorbid conditions, monitoring style, affect) will also be performed. The proposed research will be the first Randomized Controlled Trial to evaluate a comprehensive and highly disseminable and self-sustaining intervention for facilitating post-treatment adaptation among early-stage Pca survivors. In addition, use of and usability, accessibility, and satisfaction with PROGRESS will be assessed.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPROGRESS

PROGRESS is a multimedia website designed to help prostate cancer survivors.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Received a diagnosis of localized disease confined to the prostate, with no regional lymph node or distant metastasis (stages T1, T1a, T1b, T2, T2a, T2b; T2c \[3\]); * Within one year completion of either radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy(external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy); * Have access to a personal computer with Internet access (either in home or at a community center); * 18 years of age or older; * Able to communicate in English * Able to give consent

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to use a computer * Unable to communicate in English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adaptive CopingChange in coping from baseline to six monthsAdaptive coping was measured with the Cancer Coping Questionnaire. The total score from the Cancer Coping Questionnaire is a mean scale. There were a total of 14 items, each with a Likert-type 4-point scale, with 1 being the minimum value and 4 being the maximum value. A higher score indicated greater coping ability (i.e., better outcome).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Functioning - Urinary IrritationChange from baseline to six monthsThis will be measured using the Urinary Irritation Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had four items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less urinary irritation (i.e., better outcome).
Physical Functioning - BowelChange from baseline to six monthsThis will be measured using the Bowel Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had six items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less bowel problems (i.e., better outcome).
Physical Functioning - Urinary IncontinenceChange from baseline to six monthsThis will be measured using the Urinary Incontinence Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had four items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less urinary incontinence (i.e., better outcome).
Interpersonal Concerns - Medical InteractionsChange from baseline to six monthsSatisfaction with communication in medical interactions will be assessed with the medical interactions scale from the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES): difficulty communicating with the medical team, and problems obtaining information from the medical team. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 4. A higher score means patients had worse medical interactions (i.e., worse outcome).
Interpersonal Concerns - Marital InteractionsChange from baseline to six monthsSatisfaction with marital communication will be assessed from the marital problems scale from the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 4. A higher score means more marital problems (i.e., worse outcome).
Physical Functioning - Sexual FunctioningChange from baseline to six monthsThis will be measured using the Sexual Functioning Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had six items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less sexual problems (i.e., better outcome).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Print materials
214
Intervention Group
PROGRESS PROGRESS: PROGRESS is a multimedia website designed to help prostate cancer survivors.
217
Total431

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlIntervention GroupTotal
Age, Continuous63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
63.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
63.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Prostate cancer treatment completed
Other (multiple treatments)
31 Participants24 Participants55 Participants
Prostate cancer treatment completed
Radiation Only
50 Participants59 Participants109 Participants
Prostate cancer treatment completed
Surgery Only
131 Participants130 Participants261 Participants
PSA at diagnosis (ng/ml)8.6 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
14.0 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49
11.4 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
51 Participants40 Participants91 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
143 Participants160 Participants303 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
18 Participants17 Participants35 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
214 participants217 participants431 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
214 Participants217 Participants431 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2140 / 217
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2140 / 217
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2140 / 217

Outcome results

Primary

Adaptive Coping

Adaptive coping was measured with the Cancer Coping Questionnaire. The total score from the Cancer Coping Questionnaire is a mean scale. There were a total of 14 items, each with a Likert-type 4-point scale, with 1 being the minimum value and 4 being the maximum value. A higher score indicated greater coping ability (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Change in coping from baseline to six months

Population: Data provided for participants with six month data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlAdaptive Coping-0.089 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.559
Intervention GroupAdaptive Coping-0.013 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.602
p-value: 0.9634Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Interpersonal Concerns - Marital Interactions

Satisfaction with marital communication will be assessed from the marital problems scale from the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 4. A higher score means more marital problems (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Change from baseline to six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlInterpersonal Concerns - Marital Interactions-0.042 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.956
Intervention GroupInterpersonal Concerns - Marital Interactions0.182 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.358
p-value: 0.7593Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Interpersonal Concerns - Medical Interactions

Satisfaction with communication in medical interactions will be assessed with the medical interactions scale from the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES): difficulty communicating with the medical team, and problems obtaining information from the medical team. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 4. A higher score means patients had worse medical interactions (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Change from baseline to six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlInterpersonal Concerns - Medical Interactions-0.311 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.783
Intervention GroupInterpersonal Concerns - Medical Interactions-0.531 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.554
p-value: 0.7061Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Physical Functioning - Bowel

This will be measured using the Bowel Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had six items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less bowel problems (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Change from baseline to six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPhysical Functioning - Bowel1.479 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.33
Intervention GroupPhysical Functioning - Bowel3.119 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.847
p-value: 0.7938Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Physical Functioning - Sexual Functioning

This will be measured using the Sexual Functioning Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had six items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less sexual problems (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Change from baseline to six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPhysical Functioning - Sexual Functioning4.793 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.829
Intervention GroupPhysical Functioning - Sexual Functioning3.046 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.402
p-value: 0.6765Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Physical Functioning - Urinary Incontinence

This will be measured using the Urinary Incontinence Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had four items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less urinary incontinence (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Change from baseline to six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPhysical Functioning - Urinary Incontinence9.240 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.671
Intervention GroupPhysical Functioning - Urinary Incontinence10.750 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.933
p-value: 0.5214Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Physical Functioning - Urinary Irritation

This will be measured using the Urinary Irritation Scale from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC 26-SF), a 26 item shortened version of EPIC, a 61 item questionnaire for assessing urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal dysfunction and distress/bother in prostate cancer patients. The scale had four items, each with a Likert-type 4- or 5-item scale, with 1 being the minimum and 4 or 5 being the maximum. These scores were then recoded to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating less urinary irritation (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Change from baseline to six months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPhysical Functioning - Urinary Irritation10.063 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Intervention GroupPhysical Functioning - Urinary Irritation7.979 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.66
p-value: 0.4875Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026