Skip to content

Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus Versus Conventional Treatment

Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus Versus Convention Off-midline Bas Com Cleft Lift Procedure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02222298
Enrollment
300
Registered
2014-08-21
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus

Brief summary

Video assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) is a new endoscopic minimally invasive treatment. In an attempt to validate the effectiveness of the VAAPS, the investigators have designed a comparative study between the conventional and the minimally invasive treatment. Two surgical procedures were evaluated: VAAPS (Experimental group) and conventional excision with a Bascom out-midline closure (Control group).

Interventions

A 5-phases' technique. The 1st phase is to insert the endoscope through the external opening (orifice). In the patients that had more than one opening the lower pit is used for access. The 2nd phase is to identify the sinus cavity and its lateral tracks. The endoscope is advanced along the pathway using slow movements, left/right and up/down. These manoeuvres and the saline solution, used as distension medium, allow the sinus cavity to accommodate the endoscope. Additionally mechanical adhesiolysis with the forceps grasping could be useful. The 3rd phase is to identify the presence of hair and its removal. The 4th phase phase is to obtain complete ablation of sinus cavity. The sinus cavity and its lateral tracks are destroyed with the electrode under continuous direct vision. The 5th phase is to obtain the accurate cleaning of sinus cavity. The saline solution flow allows the elimination of any necrotic material. A Volkmann spoon could be useful to complete the cleaning.

PROCEDUREBascom Cleft lift procedure

Sponsors

Federico II University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus

Exclusion criteria

* Absence of consent to the study * Acute abscess

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infectionat 30 days after surgeryWound infection was defined as redness and/or oedema of the skin and/or discharge.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recurrenceat 1 year after surgeryrecurrence was defined when symptoms of the disease recurred after an interval following complete wound healing.
return at workup to 30 days after surgery
Painup to 30 days after surgeryA vas-score scale (0-10) will be used
satisfactionup to six months after surgerya Vas-score scale (0-10) and a SF\_36 model will be used

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026