Skip to content

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Versus Blind Corticosteroid Injection for Trochanteric Bursitis

Prospective, Randomized Trial of Ultrasound Guided and Blind Corticosteroid Injection for Trochanteric Bursitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02221817
Enrollment
80
Registered
2014-08-20
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2021-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bursitis

Brief summary

Trochanteric bursitis is a common condition, effecting 20% of the population. \\Most with trochanteric bursitis experience chronic intermittent or continuous hip pain at and around the greater trochanter. The cause of trochanteric bursitis is believed to be a result of inflammation of the bursa, though this has not been confirmed. Accordingly, the use of corticosteroid injections has been shown to provide considerable relief. However, routine blind injections, those performed without the aid of imaging, such as fluoroscopy, have shown limited success in the appropriate needle placement. Fortunately, blind injections have yielded positive results in majority of the cases. Additionally, the use of fluoroscopy has not shown to improve clinical outcome for trochanter bursa injections. Although the use of fluoroscopy has not shown positive benefit, other modes of imaging, such as ultrasound have not been studied and may be more useful. Fluoroscopy allows for bony-landmark based injections. Ultrasound allows for direct visualization of the soft tissue structures such as the bursa and has gained significant support for use in musculoskeletal injections. This prospective blinded study's aim is to evaluate, if any, the benefit of an ultrasound guided injection and whether ultrasound should be routinely used during trochanter bursa injections.

Interventions

PROCEDURETrochanter bursa injections
DEVICEUltrasound

Sponsors

West Virginia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of trochanteric bursitis 2. 18 years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained 3. Signed Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergy to triamcinolone or bupivicaine 2. Coagulopathy 3. Active Infection 4. Currently diagnosed with cognitive impairment, or exhibits any characteristic, that would limit study candidate's ability to assess pain relief or complete study assessments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain Intensity Measured on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)3 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability Measured on Becks Disability ScaleBaseline, 2 weeks, 3 month
Adverse Effects2 weeks, 3 month
Pain Improvement2 weeks, 3 monthsPercent improvement

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was ended and the PI has left the institution. The numbers presented are what was initially entered by the research team. From data available, 80 participants were enrolled on the study; no information about those participants could be located. No other data could be located and it cannot be determined which arm the 80 participants were enrolled in or if they completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Blind
Trochanter injection Trochanter bursa injections
0
Ultrasound
Trochanter injection Trochanter bursa injections Ultrasound
0
Total0

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Intensity Measured on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Time frame: 3 month

Population: The study was ended and the PI has left the institution. No results information is available, all efforts were to made to retrieve results information, but were unsuccessful. No study data is available.

Secondary

Adverse Effects

Time frame: 2 weeks, 3 month

Population: The study was ended and the PI has left the institution. No results information is available, all efforts were to made to retrieve results information, but were unsuccessful. No study data is available.

Secondary

Disability Measured on Becks Disability Scale

Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 3 month

Population: The study was ended and the PI has left the institution. No results information is available, all efforts were to made to retrieve results information, but were unsuccessful. No study data is available.

Secondary

Pain Improvement

Percent improvement

Time frame: 2 weeks, 3 months

Population: The study was ended and the PI has left the institution. No results information is available, all efforts were to made to retrieve results information, but were unsuccessful. No study data is available.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026