Skip to content

The Combiotic-Study

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of an Infant Formula Containing Synbiotics and Its Effects on the Incidence of Infectious Diseases in the Infant Gut : a Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Interventional Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02221687
Acronym
GOLFIII
Enrollment
540
Registered
2014-08-20
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2021-04-30
Last updated
2022-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Term Infants

Keywords

synbiotic formula, infant formula, diarrhea

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that a synbiotic formula, fed for the duration of the first year of life (infant and follow-on formula) reduces the incidence rate of episodes of infectious diarrhea in infants during the first year of life compared to a standard infant formula.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSynbiotic formula

Standard milk formula enriched with a prebiotic fiber and a probiotic strain

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTControl formula

Standard milk formula without pre and probiotic

Sponsors

Biofortis Mérieux NutriSciences
CollaboratorOTHER
HiPP GmbH & Co. Vertrieb KG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Weeks to 5 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy term infants * Female or male gender * Gestational age between 37 and 41 weeks completed (= 41 weeks + 6 days) * Age at time of V1 visit : 4 +/- 7 days * Birth weight between 2500 ans 4200g, with regular weight gain (≥ 150g / week) * Two legal representatives (parent(s) / guardian(s)) who are capable of and willing to comply with the protocol and have signed the informed consent in accordance with legal requirements. * at least one of the legal representatives is affiliated to with a social security scheme. Additionnaly , criteria of inclusion in one of the formula-fed groups or in the breast-fed group, respectively, are the following: * To be included in one of the formula arm, infants will have to be exclusively formula-fed (no breast milk meal) at the time of V1 visit (randomization). or * To be included in the breastfeeding arm, infants will have to be exclusively breast-fed (no more than one formula meal per day) at V1 visit (randomization) and its mother will have to be willing to pursue exclusive breastfeeding at least until the infant will be 4-month old.

Exclusion criteria

* Intensive care during at least the first 14 days of life * Neonatal health problems, such as: respiratory distress, asphyxia, hypoglycemia, sepsis, NEC (necrotizing enterocolitis),... * Clinical evidence of chronic illness or gastrointestinal disorders such as : GER (Gastrooesophageal Reflux), gastroenteritis,... * Known metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, lactose intolerance,.... * Known immune deficiency * Subjects recommended to receive formula with hydrolized protein (e.g. children with allergy risk) * Subject under oral antibiotic treatment at V1 visit * Participation in another biomedical study * Whose legal representatives have psychological or linguistic incapability to sign the informed consent form * Reasons to presume that parents are unable to meet the study plan requirements (e.g. impossibility to contact study representatives in case of emergency, drug addiction etc)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
(Cumulative) number of infectious diarrhea episodes per subject during the first year of life.one yearDifference between formula groups are evaluated via incidence rate based on number of subjects. In formula-fed infants, diarrhea is defined as three or more loose or watery stools in 24 hours with or without fever or vomiting (according to WHO and ESPGHAN definition). For breast-fed infants, a change in stool consistency versus previous stool consistency is more indicative of diarrhea than stool number. Diarrhea episode is considered as ended as soon as 2 consecutive non-watery stools are observed or no stools are observed in 24 hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis of fecal microbiota by molecular analysis from frozen stools in planned stool samples4 monthsLevels of total lactobacilli, Lactobacillus fermentum species (and if possible the strain CECT 5716 will be quantified too), total bifidobacteria, enterobacteriaceae, clostridium difficile
Analysis of fecal microbiota by molecular analysis from frozen stools in diarrhea samples1 yearlevels of potential pathogens causing diarrhea including rotavirus, norovirus, Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli (potential pathogenic bacteria will be screened only in case of negative testing for viruses on sample collected within 72 hours after beginning of the diarrhea episode);
Fecal pH and levels of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in planned stool samples4 monthsshort chain fatty acids (SCFA): acetate, propionate, butyrate;
Characteristics of bowel movements and stools4 months\- assessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents * average daily number of bowel movements; * (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) (using the validated scale for preterm and term infants proposed by Bekkali N, et al., 2009), and especially * average daily incidence of loose or watery stools (category A, subscale 'consistency' on Bekkali scale); * dominant stool color per visit
Characteristics of bowel movements during diarrhea episodes1 year\- assessed through a diary filled in by parents during diarrhea episodes * average daily number of bowel movements per diarrhea episode; * average duration (number of days) of diarrhea episodes; * total number of days with diarrhea, within the first year of age (between V1 and V5); * (average daily) Infant Stool Form scores consistency (4-point scale), amount (4-point scale) and color (6 categories) per diarrhea episode.
Levels of fecal IgA and fecal calprotectin in planned stool samples4 months
Number and duration of infectious diseases3 yearsEspecially: otitis media, infections of upper and lower respiratory tract and of urinary tract;
Suitability for daily use4 monthsAssessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents \- average daily consumption: drinking amounts and formula acceptance;
Adverse events (AE)4 monthsAssessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents \- Number of events, number of subjects showing adverse events, intensity and relationship of AE.
Number and duration of fever episodes;3 years
Number and duration of antibiotic treatment.3 years
Infants growth measured by anthropometric measurements4 weeksweight, size, head circumference;
Child's behavior4 monthsAssessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents \- Average sleep duration and crying duration per 24 hours;
Minor gastrointestinal disorders (digestive tolerance)4 monthsAssessed through a 3-day diary filled in by parents \- average daily vomiting, regurgitation/reflux, flatulence, constipation (according to WHO definition);

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Microbiota results1 yearPhyla and families of bacteria in planned stools using 16S taxonomical metasequencing compared to the control formula in a sub-group of 96 infants only
Urinary D-Lactate and creatinine4 weeksTo assess change in the urinary lactate and creatinine (in a subgroup of 96 infants only) via ratio after 3 months of consumption of the supplemented infant formula, compared to the control formula

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026