Skip to content

A Clinical Study of Two Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatments Used With Normal Oral Hygiene

A Randomized Clinical Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatments Used With Normal Oral Hygiene

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02221349
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-08-20
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2020-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Keywords

Sensitivity

Brief summary

This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of normal oral hygiene with two different marketed dentifrices, on longer term dentinal hypersensitivity response following use of potassium oxalate desensitizers.

Interventions

Professionally applied (liquid) and self applied (gel)

DRUGSodium fluoride paste

Toothpaste used by subject

Toothpaste used by subject

Sponsors

Procter and Gamble
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Be at least 18 years of age * Provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form * Complete a confidentiality disclosure agreement * Be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee * Have at least one tooth with a Schiff sensitivity score of at least 1 in response to the air challenge.

Exclusion criteria

* Self-reported pregnancy or nursing * Severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession * Active treatment of periodontitis * Fixed facial orthodontic appliances * A history of kidney stones * Known allergies to the following ingredients; aqua, glycerin, cellulose gum, dipotassium oxalate, carbomer, sodium hydroxide, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate * Any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study * An inability to undergo any study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Air Challenge60 daysThe Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows: 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subjects responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale60 daysVisual Analog Scale (VAS) - subjects are asked to look at a VAS and designate the level of hypersensitivity they experienced as a result of the thermal and water challenges using a continuum scale of 0 = No tooth pain up to 100 = Worst tooth pain ever experienced.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oxalate Liquid & Gel Plus SnF2 Paste
Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Stannous fluoride paste, self applied Potassium oxalate: Professionally applied (liquid) and self applied (gel) Stannous fluoride paste: Toothpaste used by subject
15
Oxalate Liquid & Gel Plus NaF Paste
Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Potassium oxalate gel, self applied Sodium fluoride paste, self applied Potassium oxalate: Professionally applied (liquid) and self applied (gel) Sodium fluoride paste: Toothpaste used by subject
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalOxalate Liquid & Gel Plus NaF PasteOxalate Liquid & Gel Plus SnF2 Paste
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants15 Participants15 Participants
Age, Continuous43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.52
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.97
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian Oriental
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
21 Participants11 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multi-Racial
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants14 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 140 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 140 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Air Challenge

The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows: 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subjects responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Thirty (30) subjects received study products and were measured at the Baseline visit. Twenty-Nine (29) subjects completed the study thus, one subject dropped from the study prior to Day 60 and was not analyzed for the 60 day measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxalate Liquid & Gel Plus SnF2 PasteChange From Baseline Air Challenge-1.643 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Oxalate Liquid & Gel Plus NaF PasteChange From Baseline Air Challenge-1.500 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.906
Secondary

Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - subjects are asked to look at a VAS and designate the level of hypersensitivity they experienced as a result of the thermal and water challenges using a continuum scale of 0 = No tooth pain up to 100 = Worst tooth pain ever experienced.

Time frame: 60 days

Population: Thirty (30) subjects received study products. Twenty-Nine (29) subjects completed the study thus, one subject dropped from the study prior to Day 60 and was not analyzed for the 60 day measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxalate Liquid & Gel Plus SnF2 PasteChange From Baseline Visual Analog Scale-29.82 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.65
Oxalate Liquid & Gel Plus NaF PasteChange From Baseline Visual Analog Scale-24.67 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026