Skip to content

Alogliptin Tablets Specified Drug-use Survey Type 2 Diabetic Patients Receiving Combination Therapy With a Hypoglycemic Agent (e.g., Insulin Preparations or Rapid-acting Insulin Secretagogues)

Alogliptin (Nesina) Tablets Specified Drug-use Survey Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Combination Therapy With Hypoglycemic Drug (Insulin Preparation or Rapid-acting Insulin Secretagogues, Etc)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02221284
Enrollment
964
Registered
2014-08-20
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2019-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Pharmacological therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of alogliptin tablets (Nesina Tablets) in type 2 diabetic patients who have had an inadequate response to hypoglycemic agents (e.g., insulin preparations or rapid-acting insulin secretagogues)\* in addition to dietary/exercise therapy. Participants will receive alogliptin as part of routine medical care. \* Patients receiving these hypoglycemic agents (excluding α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidines, sulfonylureas, and biguanides) were excluded from existing specified drug-use surveys for alogliptin tablets.

Detailed description

This survey was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term use of alogliptin tablets (Nesina Tablets) in type 2 diabetic patients who have had an inadequate response to hypoglycemic agents (e.g., insulin preparations or rapid-acting insulin secretagogues) in addition to dietary/exercise therapy. Participants will receive alogliptin as part of routine medical care. For adults, 25 mg of alogliptin is usually administered orally once daily.

Interventions

DRUGAlogliptin

Alogliptin tablets

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Type 2 diabetic patients meeting the following criteria are included in this survey: Patients who have had an inadequate response to the following medications/therapies: • Use of one hypoglycemic agent such as insulin preparations and rapid-acting insulin secretagogues, excluding other types of hypoglycemic agents (e.g., α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidines, sulfonylureas, and biguanides)\*, in addition to dietary/exercise therapy \* For use of alogliptin tablets in combination with these agents, a specified drug-use survey is currently ongoing.

Exclusion criteria

-Type 2 diabetic patients who meet any of the following criteria are excluded from this survey: Patients with contraindications for alogliptin tablets 1. Those with severe ketosis, in a state of diabetic coma or precoma, or with type 1 diabetes mellitus \[Quickly rectifying hyperglycemia with administration of intravenous fluid or insulin is essential in these patients; therefore, administration of alogliptin tablets is not appropriate.\] 2. Those with severe infections, before or after surgery, or with serious trauma \[Controlling blood glucose with an injection of insulin is desirable for these patients; therefore, administration of alogliptin tablets is not appropriate.\] 3. Those with a history of hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients of alogliptin tablets

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse ReactionsUp to Month 12Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)The reported data were number of participants who achieved specified HbA1c Level (\< 7.0% and \<6.0%) during this study.
Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Blood Glucose Level)Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)The reported data were change from baseline in fasting blood glucose level.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at final assessment point (up to Month 12) relative to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment Ratio [HOMA-R])Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)The reported data were change from baseline in HOMA-R. HOMA-R measures insulin resistance, calculated by fasting insulin (μU/mL) multiplied by fasting glucose (mg/dL), and divided by a constant (405). A higher score indicates higher insulin resistance.
Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function [HOMA-β])Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)The reported data were change from baseline in HOMA-β. HOMA-β measures as following; HOMA-β = fasting insulin (μU/mL) ×360/{fasting glucose (mg/dL) - 63}.
Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Insulin Level)Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)The reported data were change from baseline in fasting insulin level.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 196 investigative sites in Japan, from 30 June 2014 to 30 June 2017. Data reports overall population, since data not collected separately per arm as specified in protocol.

Pre-assignment details

Enrolled participants had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetic mellitus and an inadequate response to hypoglycemic agents in addition to dietary/exercise therapy. Participants received interventions as part of routine medical care. Data reports overall population, since data not collected separately per arm as specified in protocol.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alogliptin + Insulin
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months, along with insulin preparation within 3 months prior to the start of alogliptin treatment or during the alogliptin treatment period. Participants received interventions as part of routine medical care.
573
Alogliptin + Glinide
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months, along with rapid-acting insulin secretagogue (Glinide) within 3 months prior to the start of alogliptin treatment or during the alogliptin treatment period. Participants received interventions as part of routine medical care.
166
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 Inhibitor
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months, along with SGLT-2 inhibitor within 3 months prior to the start of alogliptin treatment or during the alogliptin treatment period. Participants received interventions as part of routine medical care.
102
Alogliptin + Other
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months, along without insulin preparations, glinide, or SGLT-2 inhibitor within 3 months prior to the start of alogliptin treatment or during the alogliptin treatment period. Participants received interventions as part of routine medical care.
62
Total903

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCase Report Forms Uncollected56
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAlogliptin + OtherAlogliptin + InsulinAlogliptin + GlinideAlogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorTotal
Age, Continuous61.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.31
65.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.27
67.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.71
61.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.72
65.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.65
BMI25.90 kg/meter (m)^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.312
24.40 kg/meter (m)^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.037
24.22 kg/meter (m)^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.515
26.71 kg/meter (m)^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.38
24.69 kg/meter (m)^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.065
Concomitant Allergic Condition
Had Concomitant Allergic Condition
3 Participants20 Participants5 Participants3 Participants31 Participants
Concomitant Allergic Condition
Had No Concomitant Allergic Condition
59 Participants553 Participants161 Participants99 Participants872 Participants
Concomitant Cardiac Disease
Had Concomitant Cardiac Disease
8 Participants106 Participants12 Participants6 Participants132 Participants
Concomitant Cardiac Disease
Had No Concomitant Cardiac Disease
54 Participants467 Participants154 Participants96 Participants771 Participants
Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus
Had Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus
18 Participants249 Participants43 Participants37 Participants347 Participants
Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus
Had No Concomitant Diabetes Mellitus
44 Participants324 Participants123 Participants65 Participants556 Participants
Concomitant Heart Failure
Had Concomitant Heart Failure
1 Participants27 Participants0 Participants1 Participants29 Participants
Concomitant Heart Failure
Had No Concomitant Heart Failure
61 Participants546 Participants166 Participants101 Participants874 Participants
Concomitant Hepatic Disorder
Had Concomitant Hepatic Disorder
11 Participants106 Participants19 Participants18 Participants154 Participants
Concomitant Hepatic Disorder
Had No Concomitant Hepatic Disorder
51 Participants467 Participants147 Participants84 Participants749 Participants
Concomitant Hyperlipidemia
Had Concomitant Hyperlipidemia
33 Participants312 Participants98 Participants64 Participants507 Participants
Concomitant Hyperlipidemia
Had No Concomitant Hyperlipidemia
29 Participants261 Participants68 Participants38 Participants396 Participants
Concomitant Hypertension
Had Concomitant Hypertension
36 Participants326 Participants103 Participants61 Participants526 Participants
Concomitant Hypertension
Had No Concomitant Hypertension
26 Participants247 Participants63 Participants41 Participants377 Participants
Concomitant Hyperuricaemia
Had Concomitant Hyperuricaemia
2 Participants51 Participants21 Participants9 Participants83 Participants
Concomitant Hyperuricaemia
Had No Concomitant Hyperuricaemia
60 Participants522 Participants145 Participants93 Participants820 Participants
Concomitant Malignant Tumor
Had Concomitant Malignant Tumor
3 Participants25 Participants6 Participants0 Participants34 Participants
Concomitant Malignant Tumor
Had No Concomitant Malignant Tumor
59 Participants548 Participants160 Participants102 Participants869 Participants
Concomitant Renal Disorder
Had Concomitant Renal Disorder
13 Participants161 Participants27 Participants29 Participants230 Participants
Concomitant Renal Disorder
Had No Concomitant Renal Disorder
49 Participants412 Participants139 Participants73 Participants673 Participants
Concomitant Stroke-Related Disease
Had Concomitant Stroke-Related Disease
1 Participants53 Participants9 Participants3 Participants66 Participants
Concomitant Stroke-Related Disease
Had No Concomitant Stroke-Related Disease
61 Participants520 Participants157 Participants99 Participants837 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Grade 1
4 Participants25 Participants7 Participants5 Participants41 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Grade 2
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Normal
36 Participants404 Participants94 Participants63 Participants597 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Unknown
21 Participants140 Participants62 Participants29 Participants252 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (Cr)
Moderate
0 Participants17 Participants3 Participants1 Participants21 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (Cr)
Moderate or Severe
0 Participants19 Participants3 Participants1 Participants23 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (Cr)
Normal or Mild
42 Participants431 Participants94 Participants78 Participants645 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (Cr)
Severe
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (Cr)
Unknown
20 Participants123 Participants69 Participants23 Participants235 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (eGFR)
Mild
22 Participants235 Participants38 Participants38 Participants333 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (eGFR)
Moderate
4 Participants118 Participants28 Participants18 Participants168 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (eGFR)
Moderate or Severe
4 Participants130 Participants29 Participants18 Participants181 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (eGFR)
Normal
16 Participants85 Participants30 Participants23 Participants154 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (eGFR)
Normal or Mild
38 Participants320 Participants68 Participants61 Participants487 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (eGFR)
Severe
0 Participants12 Participants1 Participants0 Participants13 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction (eGFR)
Unknown
20 Participants123 Participants69 Participants23 Participants235 Participants
Drinking Habits
No
39 Participants377 Participants92 Participants57 Participants565 Participants
Drinking Habits
Unknown
9 Participants86 Participants25 Participants22 Participants142 Participants
Drinking Habits
Yes
14 Participants110 Participants49 Participants23 Participants196 Participants
Duration of Diagnosis of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (Years)7.45 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.831
14.24 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.858
9.03 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.058
6.57 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.911
12.26 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.458
Healthcare Category
Inpatient
5 Participants34 Participants5 Participants1 Participants45 Participants
Healthcare Category
Outpatient
57 Participants539 Participants161 Participants101 Participants858 Participants
Height162.4 Centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.02
160.0 Centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
160.2 Centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12
164.3 Centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.38
160.6 Centimeters (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.78
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)8.78 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.053
8.44 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.662
7.60 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.051
7.66 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.379
8.21 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.612
Medical Complications
Had Medical Complications
48 Participants504 Participants148 Participants81 Participants781 Participants
Medical Complications
Had No Medical Complications
14 Participants69 Participants18 Participants21 Participants122 Participants
Medical History
Had Medical History
12 Participants125 Participants28 Participants5 Participants170 Participants
Medical History
Had No Medical History
47 Participants411 Participants123 Participants95 Participants676 Participants
Medical History
Unknown
3 Participants37 Participants15 Participants2 Participants57 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
Class I
1 Participants15 Participants0 Participants0 Participants16 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
Class II
0 Participants9 Participants0 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
Unknown
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Predisposition to Hypersensitivity
Had No Predisposition to Hypersensitivity
56 Participants508 Participants141 Participants98 Participants803 Participants
Predisposition to Hypersensitivity
Had Predisposition to Hypersensitivity
4 Participants33 Participants11 Participants3 Participants51 Participants
Predisposition to Hypersensitivity
Unknown
2 Participants32 Participants14 Participants1 Participants49 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
62 Participants573 Participants166 Participants102 Participants903 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants257 Participants67 Participants35 Participants385 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants316 Participants99 Participants67 Participants518 Participants
Smoking Classification
Current Smoker
16 Participants64 Participants31 Participants15 Participants126 Participants
Smoking Classification
Ex-Smoker
10 Participants103 Participants45 Participants19 Participants177 Participants
Smoking Classification
Never Smoked
25 Participants289 Participants65 Participants43 Participants422 Participants
Smoking Classification
Unknown
11 Participants117 Participants25 Participants25 Participants178 Participants
Waist Circumference (Female)
< 90 cm
1 Participants25 Participants13 Participants2 Participants41 Participants
Waist Circumference (Female)
>= 90 cm
1 Participants15 Participants3 Participants2 Participants21 Participants
Waist Circumference (Female)
Unknown
24 Participants217 Participants51 Participants31 Participants323 Participants
Waist Circumference (Male)
< 85 cm
1 Participants15 Participants12 Participants2 Participants30 Participants
Waist Circumference (Male)
>= 85 cm
5 Participants22 Participants17 Participants9 Participants53 Participants
Waist Circumference (Male)
Unknown
30 Participants279 Participants70 Participants56 Participants435 Participants
Weight68.32 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.248
62.57 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.91
62.45 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.141
72.37 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.654
64.11 Kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.667

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 5730 / 1660 / 1020 / 62
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 5732 / 1660 / 1020 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 5730 / 1660 / 1020 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Up to Month 12

Population: Safety Analysis Set; The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Alogliptin + InsulinPercentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions5.41 Percentage of Participants
Alogliptin + GlinidePercentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions1.20 Percentage of Participants
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorPercentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions0.98 Percentage of Participants
Alogliptin + OtherPercentage of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Reactions0.00 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at final assessment point (up to Month 12) relative to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)

Population: Efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed study and had available efficacy data at baseline and post baseline. Efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in Alogliptin + Insulin, Alogliptin + Glinide and Alogliptin + SGLT-2 inhibitor groups and data for Alogliptin + Other were not collected as specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + InsulinChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.66 PercentStandard Deviation 1.622
Alogliptin + GlinideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.49 PercentStandard Deviation 0.94
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.60 PercentStandard Deviation 1.102
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Blood Glucose Level)

The reported data were change from baseline in fasting blood glucose level.

Time frame: Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)

Population: Efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed study and had available efficacy data at baseline and post baseline. Efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in Alogliptin + Insulin, Alogliptin + Glinide and Alogliptin + SGLT-2 inhibitor groups and data for Alogliptin + Other were not collected as specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + InsulinChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Blood Glucose Level)-16.4 Milligram (mg)/deciliter (dL)Standard Deviation 65.96
Alogliptin + GlinideChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Blood Glucose Level)-32.0 Milligram (mg)/deciliter (dL)Standard Deviation 42
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Blood Glucose Level)-18.7 Milligram (mg)/deciliter (dL)Standard Deviation 35.86
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Insulin Level)

The reported data were change from baseline in fasting insulin level.

Time frame: Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)

Population: Efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed study and had available efficacy data at baseline and post baseline. Efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in Alogliptin + Insulin, Alogliptin + Glinide and Alogliptin + SGLT-2 inhibitor groups and data for Alogliptin + Other were not collected as specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + InsulinChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Insulin Level)-3.08 Micro Units per Milliliter (μU/mL)Standard Deviation 3.414
Alogliptin + GlinideChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Insulin Level)2.26 Micro Units per Milliliter (μU/mL)Standard Deviation 4.948
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Fasting Insulin Level)0.40 Micro Units per Milliliter (μU/mL)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function [HOMA-β])

The reported data were change from baseline in HOMA-β. HOMA-β measures as following; HOMA-β = fasting insulin (μU/mL) ×360/{fasting glucose (mg/dL) - 63}.

Time frame: Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)

Population: Efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed study and had available efficacy data at baseline and post baseline. Efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in Alogliptin + Insulin, Alogliptin + Glinide and Alogliptin + SGLT-2 inhibitor groups and data for Alogliptin + Other were not collected as specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + InsulinChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function [HOMA-β])12.32 Percentage of beta cell functionStandard Deviation 17.286
Alogliptin + GlinideChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function [HOMA-β])33.38 Percentage of beta cell functionStandard Deviation 19.851
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function [HOMA-β])15.40 Percentage of beta cell function
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment Ratio [HOMA-R])

The reported data were change from baseline in HOMA-R. HOMA-R measures insulin resistance, calculated by fasting insulin (μU/mL) multiplied by fasting glucose (mg/dL), and divided by a constant (405). A higher score indicates higher insulin resistance.

Time frame: Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)

Population: Efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed study and had available efficacy data at baseline and post baseline. Efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in Alogliptin + Insulin, Alogliptin + Glinide and Alogliptin + SGLT-2 inhibitor groups and data for Alogliptin + Other were not collected as specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alogliptin + InsulinChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment Ratio [HOMA-R])-2.58 HOMA-R ScoreStandard Deviation 2.17
Alogliptin + GlinideChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment Ratio [HOMA-R])-0.25 HOMA-R ScoreStandard Deviation 2.094
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorChange From Baseline in Laboratory Test Values (Homeostasis Model Assessment Ratio [HOMA-R])0.00 HOMA-R Score
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)

The reported data were number of participants who achieved specified HbA1c Level (\< 7.0% and \<6.0%) during this study.

Time frame: Baseline, and final assessment point (up to Month 12)

Population: Efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed study and had available efficacy data at baseline and post baseline. Efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in Alogliptin + Insulin, Alogliptin + Glinide and Alogliptin + SGLT-2 inhibitor groups and data for Alogliptin + Other were not collected as specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alogliptin + InsulinNumber of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)HbA1c Level < 7.0%161 Participants
Alogliptin + InsulinNumber of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)HbA1c Level < 6.0%22 Participants
Alogliptin + GlinideNumber of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)HbA1c Level < 7.0%87 Participants
Alogliptin + GlinideNumber of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)HbA1c Level < 6.0%10 Participants
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorNumber of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)HbA1c Level < 7.0%55 Participants
Alogliptin + SGLT-2 InhibitorNumber of Participants Achieving Specified HbA1c Level (< 7.0% and <6.0%)HbA1c Level < 6.0%7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026