Skip to content

Evaluation of the PelvicSim Simulator for Training in Intrauterine Device Insertions

Evaluation of the PelvicSim Simulator for Training in Intrauterine Device Insertions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02220205
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-08-19
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2017-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraceptive Devices, Intrauterine, Education, Medical

Keywords

IUD, training, simulation

Brief summary

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a very effective, long-acting method of contraception. In order to make them accessible to women, health care providers must be trained to insert them. Physicians, physician assistant, and nurse practitioners often learn how to do so by first learning about IUDs, then practicing on a model that the IUD manufacturer provides. Educators have recently been using more sophisticated models to teach clinical skills such as surgical procedures. We are investigating whether these models may be more useful in teaching IUD insertion.

Interventions

OTHERPelvicSim
DEVICEManufacturer model

Sponsors

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* First-year residents in obstetrics and gynecology or family medicine, or student in physician assistant or nurse practitioner training programs * Trainees who have performed \<5 intrauterine device insertions * Trainees who plan to provide intrauterine devices in their clinical practice

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial PracticeBefore and immediately after initial practice on assigned simulator (same day), and three months after initial practiceParticipants were filmed performing 3 IUD insertions each, for three IUDs available in the US. They then practiced on an assigned simulator for 30 minutes, and were re-recorded immediately afterwards. Three months after initial practice, they returned and performed the insertions again. Sets of insertions were scored using a checklist. Participants earned up to 86 points for performing various elements of IUC insertion correctly: sounding the uterus (14 points), and loading as well as inserting the copper device (24 points), levonorgestrel 52mg device (26 points), and levonorgestrel 13.5mg device (22 points). Higher scores were better.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertionBaseline to three monthsParticipants were given questionnaires at the initial study visit and at a three-month follow-up visit that assessed their comfort with IUD insertion using a modified Likert scale.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

One participant voluntarily withdrew from the study due to time constraints which precluded completion of the study visit. Therefore, 60 participants enrolled and were randomized, and 59 completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PelvicSim
Participants randomized to this arm practice IUD insertion on the PelvicSim for 30 minutes. PelvicSim
29
Manufacturer Model
Participants randomized to this arm practice IUD insertion on models provided by the IUD manufacturer for 30 minutes. Manufacturer model
30
Total59

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPelvicSimManufacturer ModelTotal
Age, Continuous26 years28 years27 years
Occupation
Intern
8 participants12 participants20 participants
Occupation
Nurse practitioner student
21 participants18 participants39 participants
Prior IUD insertions performed
0
23 exams28 exams51 exams
Prior IUD insertions performed
>=1
6 exams2 exams8 exams
Prior pelvic exams
0
10 exams5 exams15 exams
Prior pelvic exams
>10
7 exams9 exams16 exams
Prior pelvic exams
1-5
10 exams10 exams20 exams
Prior pelvic exams
6-10
2 exams6 exams8 exams
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants30 participants59 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants26 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Insertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial Practice

Participants were filmed performing 3 IUD insertions each, for three IUDs available in the US. They then practiced on an assigned simulator for 30 minutes, and were re-recorded immediately afterwards. Three months after initial practice, they returned and performed the insertions again. Sets of insertions were scored using a checklist. Participants earned up to 86 points for performing various elements of IUC insertion correctly: sounding the uterus (14 points), and loading as well as inserting the copper device (24 points), levonorgestrel 52mg device (26 points), and levonorgestrel 13.5mg device (22 points). Higher scores were better.

Time frame: Before and immediately after initial practice on assigned simulator (same day), and three months after initial practice

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PelvicSimInsertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial PracticePre-simulation61.5 Percent of tasks performed correctly
PelvicSimInsertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial PracticePost-simulation82.5 Percent of tasks performed correctly
PelvicSimInsertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial PracticeThree month visit65.5 Percent of tasks performed correctly
Manufacturer ModelInsertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial PracticePre-simulation67.5 Percent of tasks performed correctly
Manufacturer ModelInsertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial PracticePost-simulation83 Percent of tasks performed correctly
Manufacturer ModelInsertion Score Before and Immediately After Initial Practice (Same Day), and 3 Months After Initial PracticeThree month visit67.5 Percent of tasks performed correctly
Secondary

Percent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertion

Participants were given questionnaires at the initial study visit and at a three-month follow-up visit that assessed their comfort with IUD insertion using a modified Likert scale.

Time frame: Baseline to three months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PelvicSimPercent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertionCopper IUD89.3 Percent change in comfort
PelvicSimPercent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertion52mg levonorgestrel IUD92.9 Percent change in comfort
PelvicSimPercent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertion13.5mg levonorgestrel IUD89.3 Percent change in comfort
Manufacturer ModelPercent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertionCopper IUD96.7 Percent change in comfort
Manufacturer ModelPercent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertion52mg levonorgestrel IUD100 Percent change in comfort
Manufacturer ModelPercent Change in Comfort Placing IUDs From Pre- to Post-insertion13.5mg levonorgestrel IUD100 Percent change in comfort

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026