Skip to content

Comparing Nasal Suction Devices in Children With Bronchiolitis: A Pilot Study

Comparing Nasal Suction Devices in Children With Bronchiolitis: A Pilot Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02219334
Enrollment
55
Registered
2014-08-18
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2020-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchiolitis

Keywords

Children, Nasal suction devices, Suctioning

Brief summary

The purpose of our study is to determine the safety, efficacy, length of stay and parental satisfaction of the NoseFrida in comparison to a suction device used in the hospital setting in patients with bronchiolitis admitted under observation status.

Detailed description

Bronchiolitis is a viral illness and a common cause for admission to the hospital. Most patients with bronchiolitis are managed at home. The indications of hospitalization are poor feeding (due to increased mucus production) and respiratory distress with and without hypoxia. The acute care setting is a common destination of patients with bronchiolitis. Patients are admitted to the acute care setting for respiratory monitoring, suctioning and poor oral intake. The management of bronchiolitis is mostly supportive which includes frequent feedings, nasal suctioning, intravenous fluids and oxygen if necessary. The patients admitted to the acute care setting receive frequent nasal suctioning by a suction device (NeoSucker) and deep suctioning as needed. Since young infants are nose breathers, the use of nasal suctioning helps to relieve nasal congestion/upper airway obstruction and assists with their ability to breathe and feed. Suctioning can be accomplished by the use of the bulb suction, nasal aspirators and/or suction catheters connected to pressure devices. The role of the type of suctioning device in the management of bronchiolitis has not been studied extensively. In our study, a nasal aspirator (developed in Sweden by an Ear, Nose and Throat specialist) by the brand name of NoseFrida will be compared to the NeoSucker, a suction catheter currently used in our hospital setting which requires both a nurse and a pressure device. Nasal suctioning is less traumatic and does not cause the discomfort, bleeding and rebound swelling that deep suctioning can. Upon admission, patients will be randomized to either the NoseFrida or NeoSucker group. After consent is obtained for agreed participation, the patients parents randomized to the NoseFrida group will be given a NoseFrida/filters and instructions on usage (instructional video/postcard). The parents will be encouraged to use the NoseFrida suction device as often as they want, especially before feeds and sleep. The patients randomized to the NeoSucker group will be given the current standard of care and nasal suctioned by a nurse. Both groups will be deep suctioned as clinically needed.

Interventions

DEVICENoseFrida

The NoseFrida has four components, the collection container, an interchangeable filter, flexible tubing and a mouth piece. The end of the collection devise is placed on the patient's nostril, a tight seal is made via the vacuum created from suctioning of the mouth piece and secretions are easily aspirated. This device disassembles for quick disinfecting and cleaning.

Sponsors

Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Months to 2 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients above the age of 2 months and post-gestational age to 44 weeks and less than or equal to 2 years with signs and symptoms of bronchiolitis * clinical respiratory score (CRS) of less than or equal to 4 * principle diagnosis of bronchiolitis (International Classification of Diseases-9: 466, 466.11 and 466.19) * Patient admitted to the Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine (PHM) group * Patient with associated hypoxemia and/or respiratory distress requiring low flow O2 nasal cannula (NC) management (2L/min or less)

Exclusion criteria

* age less than 2 months * age less than post-gestational age 44 weeks * CRS greater than 4 * associated hypoxia * already using NoseFrida at home * chronic lung disease * oro-facial abnormalities * cardiac abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Median Length of Stay of the Two Devices in HoursParticipants will be followed for the duration of their stay in the EDOU, up to 48 Hours or end of hospitalization whichever is greaterThe study group will analyze the length of stay for the NoseFrida group and compare it with the NeoSucker group.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Readmitted Within 48 Hours of Discharge.within 48 hours of dischargeThe study group will analyze those patients both from the NoseFrida group and the NeoSucker group who are readmitted within 48 hours of discharge from the EDOU.
Parental Satisfaction (NoseFrida Group) Will be Measured Using a Newly Developed Survey Tool (Likert Scale).Participants will be followed for the duration of their stay in the EDOU, up to 48 Hours or end of hospitalization whichever is greaterA study specific survey was developed to measure parental satisfaction of the NoseFrida device. The parental satisfaction question responses were on a 5 point Likert Scale as follows: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree and 5=Strongly Agree. The minimum value is strongly disagree and maximum is strongly agree. The likert scale assessed parental satisfaction with the use of the device.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NoseFrida
If randomized to the NoseFrida group, the NoseFrida/filters will be given along with educational instruction of its use to the parents of patients admitted with bronchiolitis. The NoseFrida will be used by the parent to suction the nares of their infants/toddlers. NoseFrida: The NoseFrida has four components, the collection container, an interchangeable filter, flexible tubing and a mouth piece. The end of the collection devise is placed on the patient's nostril, a tight seal is made via the vacuum created from suctioning of the mouth piece and secretions are easily aspirated. This device disassembles for quick disinfecting and cleaning.
24
NeoSucker
The NeoSucker (used for nasal suctioning) is part of the current standard of care for patients with bronchiolitis. The NeoSucker is used for removing nasal secretions by a nurse or respiratory therapist. The NeoSucker is a plastic tube which is used to suction the secretions. The bedside nurse will continue to use the NeoSucker as needed. NoseFrida will not be used for this sub group of patients.
20
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation73
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNoseFridaTotalNeoSucker
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
24 Participants44 Participants20 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants17 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants27 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Length of stay26.23 Hours25.93 Hours25.13 Hours
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants32 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants18 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants26 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 320 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Median Length of Stay of the Two Devices in Hours

The study group will analyze the length of stay for the NoseFrida group and compare it with the NeoSucker group.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their stay in the EDOU, up to 48 Hours or end of hospitalization whichever is greater

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NoseFridaComparison of Median Length of Stay of the Two Devices in Hours26.23 Hours
NeoSuckerComparison of Median Length of Stay of the Two Devices in Hours25.13 Hours
Comparison: The primary hypothesis of length of stay equivalence within a margin of ± 5 hours was tested using the two one-sided t-test (TOST) procedure, with a 5% significance level.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-10.74, 15.72]two one-sided t-test (TOST)
Other Pre-specified

Parental Satisfaction (NoseFrida Group) Will be Measured Using a Newly Developed Survey Tool (Likert Scale).

A study specific survey was developed to measure parental satisfaction of the NoseFrida device. The parental satisfaction question responses were on a 5 point Likert Scale as follows: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree and 5=Strongly Agree. The minimum value is strongly disagree and maximum is strongly agree. The likert scale assessed parental satisfaction with the use of the device.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their stay in the EDOU, up to 48 Hours or end of hospitalization whichever is greater

Population: Parental satisfaction survey was only done on Nosefrida group since the Neosucker is the standard of care

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NoseFridaParental Satisfaction (NoseFrida Group) Will be Measured Using a Newly Developed Survey Tool (Likert Scale).5 score on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Patients Readmitted Within 48 Hours of Discharge.

The study group will analyze those patients both from the NoseFrida group and the NeoSucker group who are readmitted within 48 hours of discharge from the EDOU.

Time frame: within 48 hours of discharge

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NoseFridaPercentage of Patients Readmitted Within 48 Hours of Discharge.1 Participants
NeoSuckerPercentage of Patients Readmitted Within 48 Hours of Discharge.0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026