Skip to content

A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin (Oral Suspension or Tablets) and Vancomycin (Oral Liquid or Capsules) in Pediatric Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD)

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Investigator-blind, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Fidaxomicin Oral Suspension or Tablets Taken q12h, and Vancomycin Oral Liquid or Capsules Taken q6h, for 10 Days in Pediatric Subjects With Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02218372
Acronym
SUNSHINE
Enrollment
148
Registered
2014-08-18
Start date
2015-01-09
Completion date
2018-03-07
Last updated
2024-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD)

Keywords

Clostridium difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD), vancomycin, Clostridium difficile infection, fidaxomicin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical response to fidaxomicin oral suspension or tablets and vancomycin oral liquid or capsules in pediatric participants with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). It also investigated the recurrence/sustained clinical response to and safety of fidaxomicin and vancomycin, as well as acceptance of the fidaxomicin oral suspension formulation.

Interventions

DRUGFidaxomicin oral suspension

Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of fidaxomicin oral suspension (32 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 400 mg/day divided in 2 doses) 2 times daily for 10 days.

DRUGFidaxomicin tablets

Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 200 mg fidaxomicin tablet 2 times daily for 10 days.

DRUGVancomycin oral liquid

Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of vancomycin oral liquid (40 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 500 mg/day divided in 4 doses) 4 times daily for 10 days.

DRUGVancomycin capsules

Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 125 mg vancomycin capsule 4 times daily for 10 days.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is diagnosed with CDAD according to local diagnostic criteria. As a minimum there must be positive detection, within 72 hours prior to randomization, of either toxin A and/or toxin B in stool or positive detection of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and: * Subject from Birth to \< 2 years: watery diarrhea in the 24 hours prior to screening. * Subject ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years: ≥ 3 unformed bowel movements in the 24 hours prior to screening. * Male and female subjects aged from birth to \< 18 years: Note that in the United States of America subjects can only be included if aged ≥ 6 months to \< 18 years. * For subjects \< 5 years: Negative rotavirus test. * Female subject of childbearing potential: * must have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening, and * must abstain from sexual activity for the duration of the study, or * must use two forms of birth control (at least one of which must be a barrier method) starting at Screening and throughout the study period and for 28 days after the final study drug administration. * Female subject must not be breastfeeding at Screening or during the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration. * Female subject must not donate ova starting at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration. * Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while in the study (with the exception of studies as described in

Exclusion criteria

below).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 DaysUp to day 12Initial clinical response (ICR) for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as absence of watery diarrhea for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. ICR for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as improvement in number and character of bowel movements as determined by \< 3 unformed bowel movements (UBMs) per day for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. CCR was defined for both age groups as not requiring further CDAD therapy within 2 days after study drug completion, and was reported with a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome. Resolution of diarrhea was assessed during interviews of participant/parent/legal guardian, supplemented by review of personal records (if hospitalized) and checked for presence of watery diarrhea (ages from birth to \< 2 years) or number of UBMs (for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 DaysUp to day 19GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 9 days.
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 DaysUp to day 19Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.
Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 DaysUp to day 26SCR at EOT + 16 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 DaysUp to day 26GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 16 days.
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 DaysUp to day 26Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.
Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 DaysUp to day 33SCR at EOT + 23 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 DaysUp to day 33GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 23 days.
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 DaysUp to day 33Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.
Percentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)Up to day 40SCR at EOS was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOS (EOT + 30 days) during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.
Percentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)Up to day 40GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. Global Cure at EOT +30 days was derived using MI in case ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed) following Rubin's multiple imputation method.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 DaysUp to day 19SCR at EOT + 9 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT +9 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.
Time to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)Up to day 10TTROD for ages from birth \< 2 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first study drug dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of last episode of watery diarrhea the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days without watery diarrhea sustained through EOT). TTROD for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of the last UBM the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days of \< 3 UBMs sustained through EOT). TTROD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Those who completed treatment but did not show diarrhea resolution until EOT were censored at Day 10/240 hours. Those who did not complete treatment, discontinued earlier but did not show diarrhea resolution until disc. day were censored at disc. (days converted to hours). Those whose diarrhea did not continue after first dose were included with a TTROD of 1 hour.
Time to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 DaysUp to day 40Time to recurrence was defined as the time (days) from CCR until the onset of recurrence. Time to recurrence of CDAD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Data for median was estimated and the 95% CI could not be estimated due to low event rate. Data not estimable denoted as NA. Participants with CCR at EOT+2 days, who completed the follow-up period but did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at EOT+30 days and those who did not complete the follow-up period and discontinued during this period and did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at day of discontinuation.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From the first dose of study drug administration up to 30 days after EOT (up to day 40)An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. This included abnormal laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram data or physical examinations that were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant in the investigator's opinion. The following standard with 3 grades was used to measure the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values: ● Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities ● Moderate: Affected normal daily activities ● Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the test drug/comparative drug.
Plasma Concentrations of FidaxomicinWithin 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.
Plasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.
Metabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.
Fecal Concentrations of FidaxomicinWithin 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.
Fecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.
MPRconc Within 24 Hours of a DoseWithin 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.
Acceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Days 1 and 7Acceptance of formulation was evaluated in all participants who received fidaxomicin oral suspension and vancomycin oral liquid (i.e., participants from birth to =\< 6 years and participants \> 6 years unable to swallow tablets) by means of a five-point rating scale (awful, poor, fair, good, excellent) by unblinded staff if hospitalized, and by the participant/parents/legal guardian when at home.
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)Up to day 40Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Pediatric participants with clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) were enrolled in this multicenter study.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants who met inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled, 159 participants were assessed for eligibility of whom 148 were randomized. Participants were randomized to either fidaxomicin or vancomycin in a 2:1 ratio, stratified by age group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fidaxomicin
Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of fidaxomicin oral suspension (32 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 400 mg/day divided in 2 doses) 2 times daily for 10 days. Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 200 mg fidaxomicin tablet 2 times daily for 10 days.
100
Vancomycin
Participants from birth to \< 6 years of age received weight based doses of vancomycin oral liquid (40 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 500 mg/day divided in 4 doses) 4 times daily for 10 days. Participants aged ≥ 6 years to \< 18 years of age received a 125 mg vancomycin capsule 4 times daily for 10 days.
48
Total148

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyMiscellaneous21
Overall StudyRandomized but did not receive treatment23
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Parent/Guardian01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVancomycinTotalFidaxomicin
Age, Continuous77.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 59.2
79 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 60.8
79.7 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 61.8
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants17 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity
Missing
6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
37 Participants119 Participants82 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
36 Participants119 Participants83 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants62 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants86 Participants59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 982 / 44
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 9821 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 9812 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 Days

Initial clinical response (ICR) for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as absence of watery diarrhea for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. ICR for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as improvement in number and character of bowel movements as determined by \< 3 unformed bowel movements (UBMs) per day for 2 consecutive treatment days, remaining well until study drug discontinuation. CCR was defined for both age groups as not requiring further CDAD therapy within 2 days after study drug completion, and was reported with a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome. Resolution of diarrhea was assessed during interviews of participant/parent/legal guardian, supplemented by review of personal records (if hospitalized) and checked for presence of watery diarrhea (ages from birth to \< 2 years) or number of UBMs (for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years).

Time frame: Up to day 12

Population: The analysis population consisted of the full analysis set (FAS) which consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. In the FAS, participants were allocated to the treatment arm corresponding to the study medication that the participant was randomized to (treatment allocation as randomized).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 Days77.6 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With Confirmed Clinical Response (CCR) at End of Treatment (EOT) +2 Days70.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of CCR at EOT + 2 Days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method. Newcombe 95% confidence intervals (CIs) presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [-7.4, 23.9]
Secondary

Acceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7

Acceptance of formulation was evaluated in all participants who received fidaxomicin oral suspension and vancomycin oral liquid (i.e., participants from birth to =\< 6 years and participants \> 6 years unable to swallow tablets) by means of a five-point rating scale (awful, poor, fair, good, excellent) by unblinded staff if hospitalized, and by the participant/parents/legal guardian when at home.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Awful4 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Poor6 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Excellent13 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Fair13 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Good19 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Missing12 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Awful2 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Poor5 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Fair8 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Good21 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Excellent16 Participants
FidaxomicinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Missing15 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Missing5 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Awful5 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Fair5 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Good7 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Awful3 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Excellent4 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Missing5 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Poor3 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Excellent3 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 1 Fair6 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Poor5 Participants
VancomycinAcceptance of Formulation (Palatability Assessment) in All Participants at First Administration of Study Drug and at Day 7Day 7 Good9 Participants
Secondary

Fecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin

Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

Time frame: Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10

Population: The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FidaxomicinFecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin2685.56 μg/gStandard Deviation 2476.92
VancomycinFecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin2969.87 μg/gStandard Deviation 2713.58
Fidaxomicin TabletsFecal Concentrations of Fidaxomicin2190.63 μg/gStandard Deviation 1948.68
Secondary

Fecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118

Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

Time frame: Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10

Population: The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FidaxomicinFecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118889.23 μg/gStandard Deviation 817.83
VancomycinFecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118789.15 μg/gStandard Deviation 728.58
Fidaxomicin TabletsFecal Concentrations of Metabolite OP-11181059.73 μg/gStandard Deviation 941.04
Secondary

Metabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)

Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

Time frame: Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10

Population: The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FidaxomicinMetabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)Predose3.18 ratioStandard Deviation 1.42
FidaxomicinMetabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)Postdose2.86 ratioStandard Deviation 1.18
VancomycinMetabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)Predose3.24 ratioStandard Deviation 1.46
VancomycinMetabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)Postdose2.95 ratioStandard Deviation 1.23
Fidaxomicin TabletsMetabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)Predose3.05 ratioStandard Deviation 1.35
Fidaxomicin TabletsMetabolite-to-Parent Ratio (MPRconc)Postdose2.69 ratioStandard Deviation 1.06
Secondary

MPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose

Drug concentration was derived from the stool samples collected.

Time frame: Within 24 hours of a dose taken between day 5 and day 10

Population: The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FidaxomicinMPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose0.43 ratioStandard Deviation 0.31
VancomycinMPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose0.32 ratioStandard Deviation 0.19
Fidaxomicin TabletsMPRconc Within 24 Hours of a Dose0.63 ratioStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug or who had undergone study procedures which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. This included abnormal laboratory tests, vital signs, electrocardiogram data or physical examinations that were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant in the investigator's opinion. The following standard with 3 grades was used to measure the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values: ● Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities ● Moderate: Affected normal daily activities ● Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the test drug/comparative drug.

Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to 30 days after EOT (up to day 40)

Population: The analysis population consisted of the safety analysis set (SAF), which consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 study drug dose. In the SAF, participants were allocated to the treatment arm corresponding to study drug first administered (fidaxomicin or vancomycin), even if it differed from the treatment randomized to.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related Serious TEAE0 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related Moderate TEAE4 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Moderate TEAE39 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Mild TEAE56 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related Mild TEAE3 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE Leading to Death3 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related TEAE Leading to Death0 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE72 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE leading to Withdrawal of Treatment (Tx)1 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related TEAE7 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Tx0 Participants
FidaxomicinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious TEAE24 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Tx0 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious TEAE12 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related Serious TEAE0 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Moderate TEAE14 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Mild TEAE30 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related TEAE5 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related Moderate TEAE1 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related Mild TEAE4 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE Leading to Death0 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related TEAE Leading to Death0 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE leading to Withdrawal of Treatment (Tx)1 Participants
VancomycinNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)TEAE33 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. Global Cure at EOT +30 days was derived using MI in case ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed) following Rubin's multiple imputation method.

Time frame: Up to day 40

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)68.4 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With GC at EOS (EOT +30 Days)50.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of GC at EOS (EOT +30 days). Adjusted treatment difference of rates was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [1.5, 35.3]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 Days

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 16 days.

Time frame: Up to day 26

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 Days71.4 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With GC at EOT +16 Days52.3 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of GC at EOT +16 days. Adjusted treatment difference of rates was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [2.3, 35.9]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 Days

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 23 days.

Time frame: Up to day 33

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 Days68.4 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With GC at EOT +23 Days50.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of GC at EOT +23 days. Adjusted treatment difference of rates was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [1.5, 35.3]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 Days

GC was reported as a positive (Yes) or negative (No) outcome and was calculated using SCR and ICR/CCR values according to the following conditions: ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR=Yes, then Global Cure was Yes. ● if ICR/CCR=Yes and SCR =No, then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=No (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was No. ● if ICR/CCR=Missing (SCR not assessed), then Global Cure was set to No. No multiple imputation method (MI) was used for global cure at EOT + 9 days.

Time frame: Up to day 19

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 Days75.5 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With Global Cure (GC) at EOT +9 Days54.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of GC at EOT +9 days. Adjusted treatment difference of rates was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [4.5, 37.7]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 40

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)11.8 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOS (EOT +30 Days)29.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of CDAD recurrence at EOS/EOT +30 days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [-34.5, 0.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 Days

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 26

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 Days7.9 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +16 Days25.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of CDAD Recurrence at EOT +16 days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [-35.6, -1.9]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 Days

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 33

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 Days11.8 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +23 Days29.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of CDAD Recurrence at EOT +23 days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [-34.5, 0.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 Days

Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 19

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 Days5.3 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of CDAD at EOT +9 Days22.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of CDAD recurrence at EOT +9 days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [-34.2, -1.8]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)

SCR at EOS was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOS (EOT + 30 days) during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 40

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)85.5 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With SCR at End of Study (EOS) (EOT +30 Days)71.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of SCR at EOS (EOT +30 days). Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [-0.5, 34.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 Days

SCR at EOT + 16 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 26

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 Days89.5 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +16 Days71.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of SCR at EOT +16 days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [1.9, 35.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 Days

SCR at EOT + 23 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT + 16 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 33

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 Days85.5 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With SCR at EOT +23 Days71.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of SCR at EOT +23 days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [-0.5, 34.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 Days

SCR at EOT + 9 days was defined as CCR (EOT + 2 days) without CDAD recurrence until assessment at EOT +9 days during the follow-up period. Recurrence for ages from birth to \< 2 years was defined as re-establishment of watery diarrhea after CCR to an extent that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy. Recurrence for ages ≥ 2 years \< 18 years was defined as re-establishment of diarrhea after CCR to an extent (as measured by the frequency of UBMs) that was greater than that noted on the last day of study drug with positive direct or indirect testing for the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in stool and that, in the investigator's opinion, required retreatment with CDAD anti-infective therapy.

Time frame: Up to day 19

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FidaxomicinPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 Days94.7 percentage of participants
VancomycinPercentage of Participants With Sustained Clinical Response (SCR) at EOT +9 Days77.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Adjusted difference of SCR at EOT +9 days. Adjusted treatment difference of proportions was calculated using a stratified CMH method. Newcombe 95% CIs presented for adjusted treatment difference.95% CI: [1.8, 34.2]
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Fidaxomicin

Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

Time frame: Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10

Population: The analysis population consisted of the pharmacokinetics analysis set (PKAS). The PKAS consisted of all participants randomized to fidaxomicin, having received at least 1 dose of fidaxomicin and having at least 1 valid measurement of plasma concentration or fecal concentration of fidaxomicin or its main metabolite OP-1118.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FidaxomicinPlasma Concentrations of FidaxomicinPredose20.17 ng/mLStandard Deviation 40.16
FidaxomicinPlasma Concentrations of FidaxomicinPostdose39.41 ng/mLStandard Deviation 62.15
VancomycinPlasma Concentrations of FidaxomicinPredose15.26 ng/mLStandard Deviation 20.43
VancomycinPlasma Concentrations of FidaxomicinPostdose34.60 ng/mLStandard Deviation 57.79
Fidaxomicin TabletsPlasma Concentrations of FidaxomicinPredose30.16 ng/mLStandard Deviation 63.27
Fidaxomicin TabletsPlasma Concentrations of FidaxomicinPostdose48.53 ng/mLStandard Deviation 69.85
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118

Drug concentration was derived from the blood samples collected.

Time frame: Within 30 minutes predose and 1 to 5 hours postdose taken between day 5 and day 10

Population: The analysis population consisted of the PKAS.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FidaxomicinPlasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Postdose116.64 ng/mLStandard Deviation 259.1
FidaxomicinPlasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Predose63.04 ng/mLStandard Deviation 171.97
VancomycinPlasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Postdose102.38 ng/mLStandard Deviation 245.19
VancomycinPlasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Predose42.18 ng/mLStandard Deviation 76.76
Fidaxomicin TabletsPlasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Predose105.54 ng/mLStandard Deviation 277.67
Fidaxomicin TabletsPlasma Concentrations of Metabolite OP-1118Postdose143.63 ng/mLStandard Deviation 286.31
Secondary

Time to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 Days

Time to recurrence was defined as the time (days) from CCR until the onset of recurrence. Time to recurrence of CDAD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Data for median was estimated and the 95% CI could not be estimated due to low event rate. Data not estimable denoted as NA. Participants with CCR at EOT+2 days, who completed the follow-up period but did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at EOT+30 days and those who did not complete the follow-up period and discontinued during this period and did not experience a recurrence of CDAD were censored at day of discontinuation.

Time frame: Up to day 40

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS (participants with CCR at EOT +2 days).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FidaxomicinTime to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 Days25 days
VancomycinTime to Recurrence of CDAD for Participants With CCR at EOT +2 Days26 days
Comparison: Time to recurrence of CDAD.p-value: 0.023Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)

TTROD for ages from birth \< 2 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first study drug dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of last episode of watery diarrhea the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days without watery diarrhea sustained through EOT). TTROD for ages ≥ 2 years to \< 18 years was defined as time elapsing (hours rounded up from minutes \> 30) from treatment start (time of first dose) to diarrhea resolution (time of the last UBM the day prior to the first of 2 consecutive days of \< 3 UBMs sustained through EOT). TTROD by Kaplan-Meier Method. Those who completed treatment but did not show diarrhea resolution until EOT were censored at Day 10/240 hours. Those who did not complete treatment, discontinued earlier but did not show diarrhea resolution until disc. day were censored at disc. (days converted to hours). Those whose diarrhea did not continue after first dose were included with a TTROD of 1 hour.

Time frame: Up to day 10

Population: The analysis population consisted of the FAS.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FidaxomicinTime to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)58 hours
VancomycinTime to Resolution of Diarrhea (TTROD)97 hours
Comparison: Time to resolution of diarrhea.p-value: 0.579Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026