Skip to content

Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography

Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Imaging of the Left Atrial Appendage and Right Atrial Appendage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02213666
Acronym
ICE-TEE
Enrollment
72
Registered
2014-08-11
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2017-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation ablation, Intracardiac echocardiography, Thrombus, Left atrial appendage, Right atrial appendage

Brief summary

The presence of intracardiac thrombi and their propensity for systemic embolism is a major concern in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing cardioversion and ablation procedures. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the clinical gold standard imaging modality for visualization of the right atrial appendage (RAA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) for detection of thrombi as well as risk factors associated with thrombus formation, including spontaneous echo contrast and low LAA velocity. However, TEE is a moderately invasive procedure that incurs additional risk, cost, and patient discomfort. In addition, thrombus detection via TEE may be ambiguous, and another tool capable of confirming uncertain TEE findings is desirable. This is particularly crucial in cases when adequate LAA imaging cannot be acquired or if TEE is clinically contraindicated, requiring alternative imaging modalities that can visualize these structures. Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) provides high-imaging resolution and is routinely used during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures for transseptal puncture and periprocedural catheter visualization. A majority of imaging acquired during AF ablation is performed with the ICE catheter in the right atrium (RA). However, these standard views are often unable to provide sufficient visualization of the LAA structure due to the relatively long distance between the ICE catheter and LAA. Placement of the ICE catheter in the pulmonary artery (PA) provides improved visualization of the LAA over other locations by reducing the anatomic distance between the imaging catheter and structure of interest. Recent retrospective studies have confirmed improved assessment of the LAA with ICE imaging from the PA and equivocal sensitivity and specificity when compared with TEE for evaluation of LAA thrombus. However, these studies did not systematically evaluate the presence of SEC, flow velocity, the LAA dimensions, or the RAA. Although these studies support the use of ICE imaging from the PA to clarify or confirm TEE findings, a prospective and blinded study evaluating both the LAA and RAA in its entirety is required. We hypothesize that this prospective and blinded study will confirm ICE as non-inferior to TEE in the assessment of LAA and RAA structure and for the detection of thrombi.

Detailed description

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the clinical standard for diagnosis of left atrial appendage (LAA) and right atrial appendage (RAA) thrombi before cardioversion or instrumentation of the left atrium during ablation proce- dures.1-5 Occasionally, TEE cannot be performed because of anatomic limitations requiring an alternative imaging strategy to exclude LAA thrombi. Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is routinely used during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures to guide transseptal puncture and detect complications. The standard position of the transducer is in the right atrium (RA). This allows adequate visualization of the interatrial septum and body of the left atrium (LA) but not of the LAA because of significant physical distance from the transducer. Imaging of the LAA from closer anatomic structures such as the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and pulmonary artery (PA) can improve visualization of the LAA. If ICE provided imaging of the LAA comparable to TEE with a good safety profile, it could potentially serve as an alternative to TEE in patients undergoing catheter ablation. Such an approach could reduce risk, cost, and patient discomfort associated with TEE combined with ICE. In this prospective blinded study, we sought to directly compare the sensitivity and specificity of TEE with ICE for detection of LAA and RAA anatomy and thrombus in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation.

Interventions

DEVICEIntracardiac Imaging

Imaging of the RAA and LAA with ICE and assessment of thrombus.

Sponsors

Biosense Webster, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Elad Anter
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients able to understand and critically review the informed consent. * Patients presenting for an AF and/or AFL ablation procedure who have clinical indication for TEE and ICE.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients in whom placement of an ICE catheter for adequate atrial visualization is technically not feasible. * Patients requiring urgent cardioversion. * Patients with a contraindication for TEE * Inability to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intracardiac and Transesophageal Echo ResultsTime of Clinical Procedure Only (Average 6 hours)The right atrial appendage (RAA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) will be assessed for the presence or absence of intracardiac thrombi with the Siemens AcuNav Ultrasound catheter. This is also performed with the standard of care modality, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with both operators blinded to the opposing imaging modality. The presence of LAA thrombi requires cancellation of the clinical procedure. After a determination has been made by both operators regarding the presence or absence of thrombi will investigators be unblinded to the opposing imaging modality result. If intracardiac thrombi was detected, the procedure was cancelled according to standard clinical guidelines and practice. There is no follow-up data collected. Participants were followed during enrollment and the clinical ablation procedure which is an average of a 6 hour period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were interviewed in the pre-procedure room on the day of the planned procedure after consenting for the planned clinical procedure. A Co-Investigator introduced and discussed the study with the patient in detail, provided the consent form to review and addressed any questions.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enrolled Patients
The study sample includes patients referred for a clinically indicated ablation procedure of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
72
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnrolled Patients
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
United States
72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 71
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 71

Outcome results

Primary

Intracardiac and Transesophageal Echo Results

The right atrial appendage (RAA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) will be assessed for the presence or absence of intracardiac thrombi with the Siemens AcuNav Ultrasound catheter. This is also performed with the standard of care modality, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with both operators blinded to the opposing imaging modality. The presence of LAA thrombi requires cancellation of the clinical procedure. After a determination has been made by both operators regarding the presence or absence of thrombi will investigators be unblinded to the opposing imaging modality result. If intracardiac thrombi was detected, the procedure was cancelled according to standard clinical guidelines and practice. There is no follow-up data collected. Participants were followed during enrollment and the clinical ablation procedure which is an average of a 6 hour period.

Time frame: Time of Clinical Procedure Only (Average 6 hours)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Enrolled PatientsIntracardiac and Transesophageal Echo ResultsIntracardiac Echo Completed71 participants
Enrolled PatientsIntracardiac and Transesophageal Echo ResultsTEE Completed69 participants
Enrolled PatientsIntracardiac and Transesophageal Echo ResultsTotal Cases of Definite Thrombi Identified4 participants
Enrolled PatientsIntracardiac and Transesophageal Echo ResultsTEE Diagnostic in Identification of Thrombi1 participants
Enrolled PatientsIntracardiac and Transesophageal Echo ResultsICE Diagnostic in Identification of Thrombi4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026