Skip to content

Drug Eluting Balloon Angioplasty Versus Nitinol Stent Implantation in the Superficial Femoral Artery

Randomized Controlled Trial of Paclitaxel Drug-coated Balloons vs. Nitinol Stent for Femoropopliteal Obstructions - The PAVENST Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02212470
Acronym
PAVENST
Enrollment
85
Registered
2014-08-08
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2019-10-31
Last updated
2021-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis, Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Critical Limb Ischemia, Paclitaxel, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Plaque, Atherosclerotic

Keywords

Artery, Atherosclerosis, Peripheral, Arterial, Plaque, PTA, Angioplasty, Femoropopliteal, Self Expandable Nitinol Stents

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the results of drug eluting balloon are non-inferior to the Nitinol stent implantation in the femoropopliteal segment.

Interventions

DEVICENitinol stenting

Nitinol stent deployment

Angioplasty with Drug eluting balloon after pre dilatation

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, single-center, single-blind, non-inferiority, clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years with critical lower limb ischemia, * Ruhtherford 3 or higher, * with angiographic documentation of greater than 70% or occlusion in the superficial femoral artery, * with a maximum extension of 10 cm stenosis. * The popliteal artery and at least one leg artery must be patent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy, * thrombophilia, * coagulation disorders, * presence of active or recent bleeding, * severe allergy to iodinated contrast, * renal or hepatic disease, * acute limb ischemia, * prior surgical bypass or angioplasty (with or without stent) on the target artery, * obstructive disease (stenosis\> 50%) of the aortoiliac segment ipsilateral to the target (if the aortoiliac is pre-treated, the patient may be included)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary patency12 monthsEvaluations will be conducted after 3, 6 and 12 months of the procedure. The ultrasonographic evaluation of the degree of stenosis will use the Systolic Velocity Index (division of the velocity of flow at the point of greatest stenosis by the velocity of flow in normal prior segment). Rates higher than 2.4 indicate stenosis greater than 50%

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ankle braquial Index12 monthsChange in the Ankle braquial Index evaluated in 3, 6 and 12 months
Target Lesion Revascularization12 monthsTarget Lesion Revascularization rate evaluated in 3, 6 and 12 months
Stent fracture12 monthsStent fracture rate evaluated in 3, 6 and 12 months
Rutherford classification12 monthsChange in classification from Rutherford evaluated in 3, 6 and 12 months.
Acute myocardial infarct12 monthsAcute myocardial infarct rate evaluated in 3, 6 and 12 months
Death12 monthsDeath rate evaluated in 3, 6 and 12 months
Amputation12 monthsMajor amputation defined as amputation that requires prosthesis

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026