Skip to content

InSpace™ System Over Rotator Cuff Repair in Comparison to Repair Alone.

A Randomized, Two-arm, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of InSpace™ Device Implanted Over a Rotator Cuff Repair in Comparison With Rotator Cuff Repair Only

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02210910
Enrollment
39
Registered
2014-08-07
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2018-04-30
Last updated
2018-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tear

Keywords

Massive Rotator Cuff Tear, Sub-acromial spacer, Best repair of rotator cuff

Brief summary

This is a post-marketing study to further assess the safety and effectiveness of the InSpace™ in the study population in comparison to surgical RCT repair.

Detailed description

The effectiveness will be assessed by comparing the scores of the ASES, Constant and Quick DASH outcome questionnaires with respect to pain reduction, improvement of activity of daily living (ADL) and improvement of range of motion (ROM).

Interventions

DEVICEInSpace™ system over repair

Sponsors

OrthoSpace Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: * Age 40 or older. * Positive diagnostic MRI of the affected shoulder indicating full thickness large to massive RCT of at least 3cm in diameter (according to Cofield classification2) involving one or more tendons. (MRI can be done up to 6 months prior to randomization.) * Persistent pain and functional disability of the affected shoulder for at least 3 months. Main

Exclusion criteria

: * Known allergy to the balloon material (copolymer of PLA and -θ-caprolactone). * Evidence of significant osteoarthritis or cartilage damage in the shoulder * Evidence of gleno-humeral instability * Previous surgery of the shoulder in the past 2 years, excluding diagnostic arthroscopy * Evidence of major joint trauma, infection, or necrosis in the shoulder * Partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The change in the Shoulder Scorebaseline and 6 months

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026