Skip to content

Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Disadvantaged Pregnant Women

Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Disadvantaged Pregnant

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02210832
Enrollment
257
Registered
2014-08-07
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2023-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cigarette Smoking

Keywords

smoking, pregnancy, cessation, incentives

Brief summary

Investigators will examine whether adding financial incentives to current best practices for smoking cessation during pregnancy (i.e., referral to pregnancy-specific counseling using a telephone quit line) increases cessation rates and improves infant health. While more expensive upfront compared to best practices alone, the investigators hypothesize that this treatment approach will be economically justified by the later cost savings associated with more women quitting, having healthier babies, and needing less healthcare. It should also help to reduce the greater risk for health problems often seen among those who less well off economically.

Detailed description

Smoking during pregnancy is the leading preventable cause of poor pregnancy outcomes in the U.S. Most pregnant smokers continue smoking through pregnancy producing serious immediate and longer-term adverse health consequences for the infant. Smoking during pregnancy is highly associated with economic disadvantage and a substantive contributor to health disparities. Efficacious interventions are available, but cessation rates are low (\<20%) and improvements in birth outcomes often modest or absent. Current treatments usually entail relatively brief, lower-cost interventions (e.g., pregnancy specific quit lines). There is broad consensus that more effective interventions are sorely needed. This team of investigators has developed a novel behavioral economic intervention in which women earn financial incentives contingent on smoking abstinence. In a metaanalysis of treatments for smoking during pregnancy, effect sizes achieved with financial incentives were several fold larger than those achieved with lower intensity approaches or medications. The intervention also appears to improve birth outcomes and increase breastfeeding duration. While highly promising, further research is needed in at least three areas. (1) The evidence on birth outcomes and breastfeeding is from studies that combined data across trials rather than a single prospective trial, (2) whether the intervention produces other postpartum improvements in health has not been investigated, and (3) the overall cost-effectiveness of this approach has not been examined. To examine these unanswered questions, the investigators are proposing a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the efficacy and cost effectiveness through one year postpartum of current best practices for smoking cessation during pregnancy vs. best practices plus financial incentives among 230 pregnant, Medicaid recipients. A third condition of 115 pregnant nonsmokers matched to the smokers on sociodemographic and health conditions will be included as well to compare the extent to which the treatments reduce the burden of smoking and to estimate how much more might be accomplished by further improvements in this incentives intervention without exceeding cost-effectiveness. The investigators hypothesize that best practices plus financial incentives will be more effective than usual care practices alone, that the incentives intervention will be cost effective, and that while adding the incentives reduces a greater proportion of the health and economic burden of smoking than best practices alone, more can be done while remaining cost effective. Overall, the proposed study has the potential to substantially advance knowledge on cost-effective smoking cessation for pregnant women. Importantly, because of the strong association between smoking during pregnancy and economic disadvantage, the proposed study also has the potential to contribute new knowledge relevant to reducing the serious challenges of health disparities.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBest practices
BEHAVIORALfinancial incentives

financial incentives provided contingent on biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CollaboratorFED
University of Vermont
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for two intervention arms: * report being smokers at the time that they learned of the current pregnancy; * report smoking in the 7 days prior to the first prenatal care visit with biochemical verification; * \< 25 weeks gestation; * English speaking; * plan on remaining in the geographical area through 12months postpartum. Inclusion Criteria for never-smoker comparison condition: * report being nonsmokers at the time they learned of the current pregnancy; * report no smoking in the past 6 month; * Biochemical verification of non-smoker status; * report smoking \< 100 cigarettes in their lifetime;

Exclusion criteria

* \> 25 weeks gestation; * unavailable for routine assessments through 1 year postpartum; * opioid substitution therapy; * untreated/unstable serious mental illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Levels at Final Antepartum Assessmentcollected once per women at approximately 28-weeks gestation in each of the two smoking armsAbstinence was defined as woman reports that she has not smoked, not even a puff, in the past 7 days and self-report is biochemically verified via urine cotinine testing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence PostpartumRepeated assessments completed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks postpartumCompare two treatment arms on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence assessed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24- and 48-weeks postpartum. Abstinence was defined as self-report of no smoking in past 7 days, not even a puff, with biochemical verification of self-report using urine cotinine testing
Breastfeeding in the Three Trial ArmsRepeated assessments completed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks postpartumCompare the three trial arms on overall percentage of women continuing to breastfeed at repeated postpartum assessments
Breastfeeding While Abstinent From SmokingRepeated assessments completed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks postpartumWe compared the three trial arms on the percent of women who reported breastfeeding and were biochemically confirmed to be abstinent from smoking at each postpartum assessment.
Craving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).Outcomes reported for 8 assessments (early pregnancy, late pregnancy, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 28 weeks postpartum.The craving item is on a 0 (none) to 4 (severe) scale. We report mean (SEM) scores.
Nicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.Outcomes reported for 8 assessments (early pregnancy, late pregnancy, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 28 weeks postpartum.Reporting mean total scores and SEM from the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS). Total score is an average of 7 items, with each item on a 0 (none) to 4 (severe) scale.
Infant Growth in First Year of Lifedelivery, 24-week, and 50-week postpartum assessmentsInfant growth (length & weight) expressed a Body Mass Index (BMI) percentile score was assessed at delivery, 24- and 48-week postpartum assessments.
Birth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)deliveryBirth outcomes were compared between the three study arms. Small for gestational age was defined as \<10th percentile using INTERGROWTH-21st \[2021\] https://intergrowth21.tghn.org/about/about-us/.
Birth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)at deliveryCompared three trial conditions on percent of NICU admissions
Ages & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)24- and 48-weeks postpartumThe ASQ assesses infant development in five areas (communication \[Comm\], gross motor \[GM\], fine motor \[FM\], problem solving \[PrbSlv\], personal-social \[PerSoc\]); Each area includes six items, each with a possible value of 0, 5, 10, along with a cutoff to dichotomize infants into typical/normal vs. monitor/potential delay categories for an area. Scores in each area are compared to norms; scores with 1 standard deviation of the norm mean are categorized as typical/normal and those greater than one standard deviation below the norm mean are categorized as monitor/potential delay. We report the dichotomized outcomes for each of the six areas at the 24-week and 48-week assessments noting the number of infants in each treatment condition in the monitor/potential delay category.
Birth Outcome: Gestational Age at Deliveryat deliveryBirth outcomes were obtained from the birth record. Gestational age was expressed in weeks.
Cost Per ParticipantTrial entry through 24-weeks postpartum (approximately one year following smoking-cessation quit date).Cost per participant for BP+FI and BP interventions. These costs per participant are used in calculation of the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). This ICER measure is the added healthcare sector cost per participant for BP+FI compared to BP relative to estimated net health gain per participant (QALY). Maternal net health gains in QALYs from cessation difference between treatment conditions at 24 weeks postpartum were based on Stapleton & West, 2012, Nicotine Tob Res; 14: 463-71.
Quality of Life Years Gained (QALYs)24 weeks postpartumSmoking abstinence at the 24-week assessment was converted into quality of life years gained using standardized tables reported in Stapleton & West, 2012, Nicotine Tob Res; 14: 463-71.
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)24 weeks postpartumA summary measure representing the economic value of an intervention (BP+FI) compared with an alternative (BP). The measure type used below is 'number' due to the fact that this measure is simply a ratio of mean dollars divided by mean years gained between the treatment conditions. Thus there was no alternative measure type that could be used or measure of dispersion available.
Birth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)at deliveryCompared the three trials conditions on preterm deliveries.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Additional Birth Outcome: Mean Birth Weightat deliveryBirth weight was obtained for each infant from the birth record and expressed in grams. We report the group mean and standard error for each treatment condition.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers
Five As plus referral to pregnancy-specific tobacco quit line Best practices
88
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives
Best practices plus providing financial incentives contingent on biochemically verified abstinence. Incentives are in the form of vouchers exchangeable for retail items and available through 12-weeks postpartum. Best practices financial incentives: financial incentives provided contingent on biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence
81
Never-smoker Comparison Condition
We will follow a group of never-smoker pregnant women matched to smokers on key sociodemographic and obstetrical characteristics for purposes of comparisons in birth/health outcomes at delivery and through 1 year postpartum
80
Total249

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up263217
Overall StudyPregnancy termination .341

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBest Practices for Pregnant SmokersTotalNever-smoker Comparison ConditionBest Practices Plus Financial Incentives
Age, Continuous26.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
25.87 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.17
25.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
25.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Age started smoking (yrs)15.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.96
10.19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.96
0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
15.10 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92
% attempted to quit prepregnancy64 Participants121 Participants0 Participants57 Participants
Beck Depression Inventory total score12.8 units on a 0-63 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
9.5 units on a 0-63 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
5.8 units on a 0-63 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
10.0 units on a 0-63 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Cigarettes smoked per day at 1st antepartum visit9.92 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.18
6.30 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
0 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
8.99 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.21
Cigarettes smoked per day pre-pregnancy18.27 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.42
12.51 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.43
0 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
19.25 cigarettes/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87
% endorsing that smoking will greatly harm baby70 Participants218 Participants79 Participants69 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
82 Participants228 Participants72 Participants74 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants21 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence4.33 0-10 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
2.77 0-10 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.46
0 0-10 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
3.98 0-10 scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07
% living with other smokers68 Participants150 Participants18 Participants64 Participants
Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale total score; scale: 0 (none) to 4 (severe);average item scores1.60 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
0.99 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
1.37 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76
# quit attempts during pregnancy0.73 attempts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.35
0.43 attempts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.11
0 attempts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
0.57 attempts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97
Region of Enrollment
United States
88 participants249 participants80 participants81 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants249 Participants80 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stress rating scale for past week from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme)6.3 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
4.9 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
3.3 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
5.0 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
% with none or few family who smoke23 Participants105 Participants62 Participants20 Participants
% with no smoking allowed in home62 Participants190 Participants73 Participants55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 910 / 850 / 81
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 910 / 850 / 81
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 914 / 851 / 81

Outcome results

Primary

7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Levels at Final Antepartum Assessment

Abstinence was defined as woman reports that she has not smoked, not even a puff, in the past 7 days and self-report is biochemically verified via urine cotinine testing

Time frame: collected once per women at approximately 28-weeks gestation in each of the two smoking arms

Population: Comparison of women in two smoking-cessation arms

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Levels at Final Antepartum Assessment8 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Levels at Final Antepartum Assessment31 Participants
Comparison: Hypothesized that women assigned to Best practices plus financial incentives would achieve greater abstinence than women assigned to Best practices only.p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum

Compare two treatment arms on 7-day point-prevalence abstinence assessed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24- and 48-weeks postpartum. Abstinence was defined as self-report of no smoking in past 7 days, not even a puff, with biochemical verification of self-report using urine cotinine testing

Time frame: Repeated assessments completed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks postpartum

Population: Hypothesized that women assigned to Best practices plus financial incentives would achieve greater smoking abstinence than women assigned to Best practices only.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum2 weeks postpartum17 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum4 weeks postpartum14 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum8 weeks postpartum12 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum12 weeks postpartum10 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum24 weeks postpartum11 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant Smokers7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum48 weeks postpartum10 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum24 weeks postpartum14 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum2 weeks postpartum31 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum12 weeks postpartum21 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum4 weeks postpartum30 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum48 weeks postpartum13 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial Incentives7-day Point Prevalence Abstinence Postpartum8 weeks postpartum25 Participants
p-value: <0.05Chi-squared
Comparison: Trial condition by assessment time interactionp-value: 0.003Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Ages & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)

The ASQ assesses infant development in five areas (communication \[Comm\], gross motor \[GM\], fine motor \[FM\], problem solving \[PrbSlv\], personal-social \[PerSoc\]); Each area includes six items, each with a possible value of 0, 5, 10, along with a cutoff to dichotomize infants into typical/normal vs. monitor/potential delay categories for an area. Scores in each area are compared to norms; scores with 1 standard deviation of the norm mean are categorized as typical/normal and those greater than one standard deviation below the norm mean are categorized as monitor/potential delay. We report the dichotomized outcomes for each of the six areas at the 24-week and 48-week assessments noting the number of infants in each treatment condition in the monitor/potential delay category.

Time frame: 24- and 48-weeks postpartum

Population: Overall number of participants analyzed represents the number of participants for whom we obtained data on this outcome at 24-weeks postpartum; at 48-weeks the overall number analyzed were 69, 56, and 72 in Best Practices, Best Practices plus financial incentives, and never-smokers, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)Comm at 24-weeks1 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)Comm at 48-weeks2 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)GM at 24-weeks18 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)GM at 48-weeks14 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)FM at 24-weeks28 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)FM at 48-weeks7 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PrbSlv at 24-weeks17 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PrbSlv at 48-weeks10 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PerSoc at 24-weeks15 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PerSoc at 48-weeks11 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PerSoc at 24-weeks9 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)Comm at 24-weeks2 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)FM at 48-weeks5 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)FM at 24-weeks17 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)Comm at 48-weeks0 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PerSoc at 48-weeks8 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PrbSlv at 48-weeks3 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)GM at 24-weeks10 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PrbSlv at 24-weeks7 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)GM at 48-weeks6 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PrbSlv at 48-weeks13 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)GM at 48-weeks13 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)FM at 24-weeks16 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)FM at 48-weeks7 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PerSoc at 24-weeks13 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PrbSlv at 24-weeks10 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)Comm at 24-weeks3 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)PerSoc at 48-weeks9 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)Comm at 48-weeks3 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAges & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)GM at 24-weeks10 Participants
Secondary

Birth Outcome: Gestational Age at Delivery

Birth outcomes were obtained from the birth record. Gestational age was expressed in weeks.

Time frame: at delivery

Population: Birth outcomes were obtained from 88, 76, and 79 infants born to women in the best practices, best practices plus financial incentives, and never-smoker conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBirth Outcome: Gestational Age at Delivery39.18 gestational age (weeks)Standard Error 0.22
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBirth Outcome: Gestational Age at Delivery38.69 gestational age (weeks)Standard Error 0.23
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBirth Outcome: Gestational Age at Delivery39.35 gestational age (weeks)Standard Error 0.22
p-value: <0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

Birth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)

Compared three trial conditions on percent of NICU admissions

Time frame: at delivery

Population: Compared three trial conditions on NICU admissions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBirth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)NICU admitted11 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBirth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)no NICU77 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBirth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)NICU admitted10 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBirth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)no NICU66 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBirth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)NICU admitted11 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBirth Outcomes (NICU Admissions)no NICU68 Participants
p-value: <0.05Chi-squared
Secondary

Birth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)

Compared the three trials conditions on preterm deliveries.

Time frame: at delivery

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBirth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)preterm6 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBirth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)>/= 37 weeks82 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBirth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)preterm10 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBirth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)>/= 37 weeks66 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBirth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)preterm6 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBirth Outcomes (Percent Preterm [<37 Weeks] Deliveries)>/= 37 weeks73 Participants
p-value: <0.05Chi-squared
Secondary

Birth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)

Birth outcomes were compared between the three study arms. Small for gestational age was defined as \<10th percentile using INTERGROWTH-21st \[2021\] https://intergrowth21.tghn.org/about/about-us/.

Time frame: delivery

Population: Comparison of three trial conditions on SGA deliveries

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBirth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)Small for Gestational Age16 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBirth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)Normal size for gestational age72 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBirth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)Small for Gestational Age8 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBirth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)Normal size for gestational age68 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBirth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)Small for Gestational Age2 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBirth Outcomes (% Small for Gestational Age Deliveries)Normal size for gestational age77 Participants
p-value: 0.01Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Breastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms

Compare the three trial arms on overall percentage of women continuing to breastfeed at repeated postpartum assessments

Time frame: Repeated assessments completed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks postpartum

Population: Breastfeeding data were not obtained on all women. The number of women with at least one assessment with breastfeeding data in each group is: Best practices = 79, Best practices plus financial incentives = 69, Never-Smokers = 78

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms2-weeks postpartum49 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms4-weeks postpartum40 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms8-weeks postpartum34 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms12-weeks postpartum28 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms24-weeks postpartum21 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms48-weeks postpartum9 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms48-weeks postpartum9 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms2-weeks postpartum50 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms12-weeks postpartum28 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms24-weeks postpartum21 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms4-weeks postpartum40 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms8-weeks postpartum34 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms4-weeks postpartum56 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms8-weeks postpartum48 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms48-weeks postpartum23 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms12-weeks postpartum43 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms2-weeks postpartum59 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding in the Three Trial Arms24-weeks postpartum36 Participants
Comparison: Interaction of trial condition and timep-value: 0.48Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Breastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking

We compared the three trial arms on the percent of women who reported breastfeeding and were biochemically confirmed to be abstinent from smoking at each postpartum assessment.

Time frame: Repeated assessments completed at 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, and 48-weeks postpartum

Population: Comparing women in each trial condition who reported breastfeeding and were biochemically confirmed abstinent from smoking at each postpartum assessment. Breastfeeding data were not obtained on all women. The number of women with at least one assessment with breastfeeding data in each group is: Best practices = 79, Best practices plus financial incentives = 69, Never-Smokers = 78

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking2-weeks postpartum15 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking4-weeks postpartum11 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking8-weeks postpartum9 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking12-weeks postpartum7 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking24-weeks postpartum7 Participants
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking48-weeks postpartum3 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking48-weeks postpartum5 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking2-weeks postpartum29 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking12-weeks postpartum15 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking24-weeks postpartum9 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking4-weeks postpartum24 Participants
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking8-weeks postpartum19 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking4-weeks postpartum56 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking8-weeks postpartum48 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking48-weeks postpartum23 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking12-weeks postpartum43 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking2-weeks postpartum59 Participants
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionBreastfeeding While Abstinent From Smoking24-weeks postpartum36 Participants
Comparison: Examining main effect of treatment condition.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Testing interaction of treatment condition and assessment timep-value: 0.89Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Cost Per Participant

Cost per participant for BP+FI and BP interventions. These costs per participant are used in calculation of the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). This ICER measure is the added healthcare sector cost per participant for BP+FI compared to BP relative to estimated net health gain per participant (QALY). Maternal net health gains in QALYs from cessation difference between treatment conditions at 24 weeks postpartum were based on Stapleton & West, 2012, Nicotine Tob Res; 14: 463-71.

Time frame: Trial entry through 24-weeks postpartum (approximately one year following smoking-cessation quit date).

Population: All participants treated in best practices plus financial incentives and best practices trial conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCost Per Participant23007.01 U.S. dollarsStandard Error 1284.83
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCost Per Participant22372.25 U.S. dollarsStandard Error 1594.23
Secondary

Craving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).

The craving item is on a 0 (none) to 4 (severe) scale. We report mean (SEM) scores.

Time frame: Outcomes reported for 8 assessments (early pregnancy, late pregnancy, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 28 weeks postpartum.

Population: Comparing between women assigned to the two smoking-cessation trial conditions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).4 weeks postpartum2.17 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).early antepartum2.73 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).late antepartum2.30 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).2 weeks postpartum2.14 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).8 weeks postpartum2.27 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).12 weeks postpartum2.33 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).24 weeks postpartum1.97 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).48 weeks postpartum2.10 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).48 weeks postpartum1.99 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).8 weeks postpartum1.75 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).early antepartum1.75 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).24 weeks postpartum1.97 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).late antepartum1.52 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).12 weeks postpartum1.72 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).2 weeks postpartum1.39 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesCraving Item From the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS).4 weeks postpartum1.55 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

A summary measure representing the economic value of an intervention (BP+FI) compared with an alternative (BP). The measure type used below is 'number' due to the fact that this measure is simply a ratio of mean dollars divided by mean years gained between the treatment conditions. Thus there was no alternative measure type that could be used or measure of dispersion available.

Time frame: 24 weeks postpartum

Population: Treatment conditions were combined because the ICER outcome is a measure of the economic benefit of the BP+FI intervention relative to the BP comparator.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersIncremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)23511 dollars per years gained
Secondary

Infant Growth in First Year of Life

Infant growth (length & weight) expressed a Body Mass Index (BMI) percentile score was assessed at delivery, 24- and 48-week postpartum assessments.

Time frame: delivery, 24-week, and 50-week postpartum assessments

Population: There was data available for one or more assessments for 79, 67, and 77 of infants born to mothers in the Best practices, Best practices plus financial incentives, and never-smoker conditions. We compared body mass index (BMI) percentile scores between infants from the three trial conditions at delivery, 24-weeks postpartum, and 48-weeks postpartum.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersInfant Growth in First Year of Life24-weeks postpartum56.19 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.36
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersInfant Growth in First Year of LifeBirth31.39 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.35
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersInfant Growth in First Year of Life48-weeks postpartum65.97 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.73
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesInfant Growth in First Year of Life24-weeks postpartum59.14 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.71
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesInfant Growth in First Year of LifeBirth34.92 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.51
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesInfant Growth in First Year of Life48-weeks postpartum65.69 BMI PercentileStandard Error 4.06
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionInfant Growth in First Year of LifeBirth40.56 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.2
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionInfant Growth in First Year of Life48-weeks postpartum66.62 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.47
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionInfant Growth in First Year of Life24-weeks postpartum46.15 BMI PercentileStandard Error 3.39
p-value: 0.009Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Nicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.

Reporting mean total scores and SEM from the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS). Total score is an average of 7 items, with each item on a 0 (none) to 4 (severe) scale.

Time frame: Outcomes reported for 8 assessments (early pregnancy, late pregnancy, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 28 weeks postpartum.

Population: Comparing women assigned to the two smoking-cessation trial conditions.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.Early antepartum1.47 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.Late antepartum1.38 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.2-weeks postpartum0.80 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.4-weeks postpartum0.80 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.8-weeks postpartum0.92 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.12-weeks postpartum0.86 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.24-weeks postpartum0.81 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.48-weeks postpartum1.03 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.48-weeks postpartum0.84 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.Early antepartum1.02 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.8-weeks postpartum0.68 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.Late antepartum0.93 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.24-weeks postpartum0.78 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.2-weeks postpartum0.70 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.12-weeks postpartum0.59 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesNicotine Withdrawal Total Scores for the Two Smoking-cessation Trial Conditions.4-weeks postpartum0.68 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: Examine interaction of treatment condition and assessment time.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Quality of Life Years Gained (QALYs)

Smoking abstinence at the 24-week assessment was converted into quality of life years gained using standardized tables reported in Stapleton & West, 2012, Nicotine Tob Res; 14: 463-71.

Time frame: 24 weeks postpartum

Population: Analysis of results for this measure cannot be reported separately for each treatment arm. Thus, treatment conditions were combined because the outcome is the difference in quality of life years gained (QALYs) between conditions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersQuality of Life Years Gained (QALYs)0.0267 net years gainedStandard Deviation 0.0412
Other Pre-specified

Additional Birth Outcome: Mean Birth Weight

Birth weight was obtained for each infant from the birth record and expressed in grams. We report the group mean and standard error for each treatment condition.

Time frame: at delivery

Population: Birth outcomes were obtained for 88, 76, and 79 infants of mothers in best practices, best practices plus financial incentives, and never-smokers.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Best Practices for Pregnant SmokersAdditional Birth Outcome: Mean Birth Weight3176.39 weight (grams)Standard Error 46.74
Best Practices Plus Financial IncentivesAdditional Birth Outcome: Mean Birth Weight3214.84 weight (grams)Standard Error 50.11
Never-smoker Comparison ConditionAdditional Birth Outcome: Mean Birth Weight3391.14 weight (grams)Standard Error 49.64
p-value: 0.006ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026